By interacting organism › Bacteria › Sphingobacteriaceae › Sphingobacterium

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drying enriched Sphingobacterium in coffee beans.

Taxon: coffee beanst0
Treatment: Dryinge0
Interactor: SphingobacteriumSphingobacteriume0other
Outcome: Sphingobacteriume0
Direction: enrichmente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Drying induced pronounced shifts in the microbial composition, with a significant enrichment of Sphingobacterium”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–485

e1
“Drying induced pronounced shifts in the microbial composition, with a significant enrichment of Sphingobacterium”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–485

t0
“Coffee Beans”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101

Title

Comparative Microbiota and Metabolite Profiles of Undried and Dried Typica Luwak (Civet) Coffee Beans

Mengjie Li; Xianwen Wang; Liyan Ma; et al. Foods 2026. doi:10.3390/foods15081334

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Drying depleted Streptococcus in coffee beans.
Intervention effect Drying increased prenol lipids, fatty acyls, and carboxylic acids and derivatives.
Intervention effect Drying increased steroids and steroid derivatives and organooxygen compounds.
Intervention effect Drying reduced flavonoids.
Association Altered microbial taxa and metabolites were associated with four metabolic pathway groups.
Association Key microbial genera were associated with classes of differential metabolites.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined liquid bacterial inoculants significantly improve shoot number of ber seedlings compared with control (27.45%).

Taxon: Zizyphus mauritianaZiziphus mauritianae0
Treatment: combined LBIse1
Interactor: Sphingobacterium sp.Sphingobacteriume2symbiont
Second interactor: Azotobacter sp.Azotobactere2symbiont
Outcome: shoot numbere1
Direction: improvementse1
Value: 27.45%e1
Comparator: controle1
Setting: PAU, Regional Research Station, Bathindae3

Verbatim

e0
“Indian jujube (Zizyphus mauritiana Lamk.), commonly known as ber”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–64

e1
“Seedlings treated with the combined LBIs showed significant improvements in shoot number (27.45%), shoot length (21.04%), collar diameter (29.63%), root length (17.65%), and biomass accumulation compared to control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–878

e2
“liquid bacterial inoculants (LBIs) of Sphingobacterium sp. and Azotobacter sp.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–522

e3
“A field experiment was conducted at PAU, Regional Research Station, Bathinda”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–599

Title

Enhancing Seedling Growth and Budding Potential in Ber (Zizyphus mauritiana) Using Gibberellic Acid and Bacterial Inoculants

GULAB PANDOVE; NAVJOT GUPTA Seed Research 2025. doi:10.56093/sr.v53i1.13

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined liquid bacterial inoculants significantly improve shoot length of ber seedlings compared with control (21.04%).

Taxon: Zizyphus mauritianaZiziphus mauritianae0
Treatment: combined LBIse1
Interactor: Sphingobacterium sp.Sphingobacteriume2symbiont
Second interactor: Azotobacter sp.Azotobactere2symbiont
Outcome: shoot lengthe1
Direction: improvementse1
Value: 21.04%e1
Comparator: controle1
Setting: PAU, Regional Research Station, Bathindae3

Verbatim

e0
“Indian jujube (Zizyphus mauritiana Lamk.), commonly known as ber”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–64

e1
“Seedlings treated with the combined LBIs showed significant improvements in shoot number (27.45%), shoot length (21.04%), collar diameter (29.63%), root length (17.65%), and biomass accumulation compared to control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–878

e2
“liquid bacterial inoculants (LBIs) of Sphingobacterium sp. and Azotobacter sp.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–522

e3
“A field experiment was conducted at PAU, Regional Research Station, Bathinda”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–599

Title

Enhancing Seedling Growth and Budding Potential in Ber (Zizyphus mauritiana) Using Gibberellic Acid and Bacterial Inoculants

GULAB PANDOVE; NAVJOT GUPTA Seed Research 2025. doi:10.56093/sr.v53i1.13

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined liquid bacterial inoculants significantly improve collar diameter of ber seedlings compared with control (29.63%).

Taxon: Zizyphus mauritianaZiziphus mauritianae0
Treatment: combined LBIse1
Interactor: Sphingobacterium sp.Sphingobacteriume2symbiont
Second interactor: Azotobacter sp.Azotobactere2symbiont
Outcome: collar diametere1
Direction: improvementse1
Value: 29.63%e1
Comparator: controle1
Setting: PAU, Regional Research Station, Bathindae3

Verbatim

e0
“Indian jujube (Zizyphus mauritiana Lamk.), commonly known as ber”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–64

e1
“Seedlings treated with the combined LBIs showed significant improvements in shoot number (27.45%), shoot length (21.04%), collar diameter (29.63%), root length (17.65%), and biomass accumulation compared to control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–878

e2
“liquid bacterial inoculants (LBIs) of Sphingobacterium sp. and Azotobacter sp.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–522

e3
“A field experiment was conducted at PAU, Regional Research Station, Bathinda”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–599

Title

Enhancing Seedling Growth and Budding Potential in Ber (Zizyphus mauritiana) Using Gibberellic Acid and Bacterial Inoculants

GULAB PANDOVE; NAVJOT GUPTA Seed Research 2025. doi:10.56093/sr.v53i1.13

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined liquid bacterial inoculants significantly improve root length of ber seedlings compared with control (17.65%).

Taxon: Zizyphus mauritianaZiziphus mauritianae0
Treatment: combined LBIse1
Interactor: Sphingobacterium sp.Sphingobacteriume2symbiont
Second interactor: Azotobacter sp.Azotobactere2symbiont
Outcome: root lengthe1
Direction: improvementse1
Value: 17.65%e1
Comparator: controle1
Setting: PAU, Regional Research Station, Bathindae3

Verbatim

e0
“Indian jujube (Zizyphus mauritiana Lamk.), commonly known as ber”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–64

e1
“Seedlings treated with the combined LBIs showed significant improvements in shoot number (27.45%), shoot length (21.04%), collar diameter (29.63%), root length (17.65%), and biomass accumulation compared to control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–878

e2
“liquid bacterial inoculants (LBIs) of Sphingobacterium sp. and Azotobacter sp.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–522

e3
“A field experiment was conducted at PAU, Regional Research Station, Bathinda”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–599

Title

Enhancing Seedling Growth and Budding Potential in Ber (Zizyphus mauritiana) Using Gibberellic Acid and Bacterial Inoculants

GULAB PANDOVE; NAVJOT GUPTA Seed Research 2025. doi:10.56093/sr.v53i1.13

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined liquid bacterial inoculants significantly improve biomass accumulation of ber seedlings compared with control.

Taxon: Zizyphus mauritianaZiziphus mauritianae0
Treatment: combined LBIse1
Interactor: Sphingobacterium sp.Sphingobacteriume2symbiont
Second interactor: Azotobacter sp.Azotobactere2symbiont
Outcome: biomass accumulatione1
Direction: improvementse1
Comparator: controle1
Setting: PAU, Regional Research Station, Bathindae3

Not reportedValue

Verbatim

e0
“Indian jujube (Zizyphus mauritiana Lamk.), commonly known as ber”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–64

e1
“Seedlings treated with the combined LBIs showed significant improvements in shoot number (27.45%), shoot length (21.04%), collar diameter (29.63%), root length (17.65%), and biomass accumulation compared to control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–878

e2
“liquid bacterial inoculants (LBIs) of Sphingobacterium sp. and Azotobacter sp.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–522

e3
“A field experiment was conducted at PAU, Regional Research Station, Bathinda”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–599

Title

Enhancing Seedling Growth and Budding Potential in Ber (Zizyphus mauritiana) Using Gibberellic Acid and Bacterial Inoculants

GULAB PANDOVE; NAVJOT GUPTA Seed Research 2025. doi:10.56093/sr.v53i1.13

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The PHY_PM treatment reduced the abundance of Chryseobacterium, Pedobacter, Phyllobacterium, Sphingobacterium and Stenotrophomonas in seedling-phase roots, and this effect did not persist.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage: roots in the seedling phasee3
Treatment: PHY_PMe3
Interactor: Chryseobacterium, Pedobacter, Phyllobacterium, Sphingobacterium, and StenotrophomonasPhyllobacteriumSphingobacteriumStenotrophomonasChryseobacteriumPedobactere3symbiont
Outcome: abundance of taxa like Chryseobacterium, Pedobacter, Phyllobacterium, Sphingobacterium, and Stenotrophomonase3
Direction: reducede3
Qualifier: this effect did not persiste3
Comparator: controle1
Setting: Field trialse1

Verbatim

e0
“Maize (Zea mays L.) relies heavily on nitrogen and phosphorus inputs, typically supplied through organic and inorganic fertilizers”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–130

e1
“Field trials included four treatments: a control, PHY-coated seeds, PM, and combined PHY_PM”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–677

e3
“The PHY_PM-treated roots in the seedling phase showed a reduced abundance of taxa like Chryseobacterium, Pedobacter, Phyllobacterium, Sphingobacterium, and Stenotrophomonas, but this effect did not persist. In the PM-treated roots, Flavisolibacter was significantly enriched at harvesting”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1176

Title

The Influence of Bacterial Inoculants and a Biofertilizer on Maize Cultivation and the Associated Shift in Bacteriobiota During the Growing Season

Katarina Kruščić; Aleksandra Jelušić; Matjaž Hladnik; et al. Plants 2025. doi:10.3390/plants14121753

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Early in development, poultry manure increased the rhizosphere abundance of beneficial genera Sphingomonas, Microvirga and Streptomyces relative to the control.
Intervention effect The poultry manure effect on beneficial rhizosphere genera declined in later growth stages.
Intervention effect Poultry manure significantly enriched Flavisolibacter in maize roots at harvesting.
Intervention effect Beneficial bacteria improved microbial evenness in the maize rhizosphere.
Intervention effect The PHY_PM treatment promoted bacterial diversity in the maize rhizosphere.
Intervention effect The PHY_PM treatment promoted maize growth.
Association Integration of poultry manure and PGPR correlates with maize plant parameters.
Observation Genome analysis of the PHY strains revealed plant-beneficial traits: nutrient mobilization, stress resilience and biocontrol potential.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sphingobacterium abundance rose after flowering-stage Fe-P.

Taxon: Peppert0
Treatment: Fe-P NMse1
Interactor: SphingobacteriumSphingobacteriume0other
Outcome: beneficial microorganismse0
Direction: upregulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“upregulated beneficial microorganisms (Pseudomonas, Arthrobacter, Sphingobacterium, and Paenibacillus)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1260

t0
“Pepper”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–105

e1
“after foliar spraying with 1, 10, and 50 mg of L−1 Fe-P NMs at different stages (seedling, flowering, and fruit stage), the pepper plant growth was significantly improved.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–364

Title

Preharvest and Postharvest Applications of Fe-Based Nanomaterials: A Potent Strategy for Improving Pepper Storage

Zhuang Cheng; Xianzheng Yuan; Xuesong Cao; et al. Nanomaterials 2025. doi:10.3390/nano15070497

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Fe-P foliar spraying significantly improved pepper growth.
Intervention effect Fe-P treatment increased net photosynthetic rate 132.7%.
Intervention effect Fe-P treatment increased plant height 40.4%.
Intervention effect Fe-P treatment increased fruit number 265.7%.
Intervention effect Flowering-stage Fe-P altered the capsaicin metabolic pathway.
Intervention effect Flowering-stage Fe-P upregulated genes for total phenols, flavonoids and lignans synthesis.
Intervention effect Flowering-stage Fe-P upregulated genes for capsaicinoid synthesis.
Intervention effect Fe-P increased freshness-associated metabolites.
Intervention effect Flowering-stage Fe-P reduced Enterobacter abundance.
Intervention effect Flowering-stage Fe-P reduced Chryseobacterium abundance.
Intervention effect Pseudomonas abundance rose after flowering-stage Fe-P.
Intervention effect Arthrobacter abundance rose after flowering-stage Fe-P.
Intervention effect Paenibacillus abundance rose after flowering-stage Fe-P.
Intervention effect Postharvest Fe-P dipping and spraying delayed pepper weight loss.
Intervention effect Postharvest Fe-P dipping and spraying enhanced beneficial bacteria growth.
Observation Postharvest Fe-P preservation effects were less pronounced than preharvest foliar application.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Those five metabolites attracted R. solanacearum and its helper microbes Sphingobacterium and Stenotrophomonas.

Taxon: tobaccoNicotiana tabacume1
Interactor: R. solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume0pathogen
Second interactor: Sphingobacterium and StenotrophomonasSphingobacteriumStenotrophomonase0other
Outcome: chemoattractantse0

Verbatim

e0
“efetaal, 6-methylnicotinamide, proline, sinapinic acid, and syringic acid increase with increasing disease severity, which are chemoattractants of R. solanacearum and pathogen helpers Sphingobacterium and Stenotrophomonas”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–918

e1
“tobacco plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–410

Title

Metabolic changes in root exudates of plants with different disease severity affect plant resistance by regulating the rhizosphere microbiome

Chenyang Du; Yue Kang; Qiang Zeng; et al. Pest Management Science 2025. doi:10.1002/ps.70306

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sphingobacterium comprised 12% in A2 soil.

Taxon: Cicer montbretii Jaub. & SpachCicer montbretiit0
Interactor: SphingobacteriumSphingobacteriume0symbiont
Outcome: Sphingobacteriume0
Value: 12%e0

Verbatim

e0
“Sphingobacterium 12%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1408

t0
“Cicer montbretii Jaub. & Spach”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–147

Title

NGS technologies for a comparative characterization of endophytic bacteria in the roots of Constantinople chickpeas (Cicer montbretii Jaub. & Spach) associated with cinnamon forest and yellow earth podzolic soils

Mariana Petkova; Mariya Sabeva; Nurettin Tahsin Agricultural Sciences 2024. doi:10.22620/agrisci.2024.40.002

Other claims from this paper (19)

Observation Proteobacteria abundance was similar in the two soils.
Observation Bacteriodota prevailed in yellow earth podzolic soil.
Observation Firmicutes were common in cinnamon forest soil.
Observation Actinobacteria were common in cinnamon forest soil.
Observation Proteobacteria comprised 78% of root endophytes in A1 soil.
Observation Erwinia comprised 13% in A1 roots.
Observation Pseudomonas comprised 11% in A1 roots.
Observation Shingomonas comprised 11% in A1 roots.
Observation Rhizobium comprised 5% in A1 roots.
Observation Bradirhyzobium comprised 4% in A1 roots.
Observation Proteobacteria comprised 76% in A2 soil.
Observation Bacterioidota comprised 15% in A2 soil.
Observation Orchobactrum comprised 20% in A2 soil.
Observation Stenotrophomonas comprised 15% in A2 soil.
Observation Serratia comprised 4% in A2 soil.
Observation Flavobactrerium comprised 4% in A2 soil.
Observation Root endophyte diversity index was 6.551 in A1 soil.
Observation Root endophyte diversity index was 4,692 in A2 soil.
Association Endophyte communities differed between the two soils, which authors attributed to soil and climate.

Sphingobacterium 17 claims

17 claims