Picrasma javanica 27 claims

species · family Simaroubaceae · green plant · NCBI Taxonomy ↗

3 spellings

Picrasma javanicaMuRiIrUm · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

27 claims

Open in search (filters, sorting) →

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At least six beta-carbolines were identified in the stem bark of Thai Picrasma javanica.

Taxon: P. javanicaPicrasma javanicae0
Organ / stage: stem barke0
Outcome: at least six -carbolinese0
Setting: Thaie0

Verbatim

e0
“there were at least six -carbolines in stem bark of Thai P. javanica”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–535

Title

Determination of β-carbolines in Thai Picrasma javanica Bl.; the source of potential antimalarial agents

Chalerm Saiin; Juggreewut Junwised; Nitra Nuengchamnong; et al. Advancement in Medicinal Plant Research 2019. doi:10.30918/ampr.72.19.025

Other claims from this paper (1)

Observation Crenatine, dehydrocrenatine and 6-dehydrocrenatine from Thai Picrasma javanica had antimalarial activities.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crenatine, dehydrocrenatine and 6-dehydrocrenatine from Thai Picrasma javanica had antimalarial activities.

Taxon: P. javanicaPicrasma javanicae0
Compound: crenatine, dehydrocrenatine and 6-dehydrocrenatinee1
Outcome: antimalarial activitiese1

Verbatim

e0
“there were at least six -carbolines in stem bark of Thai P. javanica”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–535

e1
“Three of them i.e. crenatine, dehydrocrenatine and 6-dehydrocrenatine had the antimalarial activities”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–848

Title

Determination of β-carbolines in Thai Picrasma javanica Bl.; the source of potential antimalarial agents

Chalerm Saiin; Juggreewut Junwised; Nitra Nuengchamnong; et al. Advancement in Medicinal Plant Research 2019. doi:10.30918/ampr.72.19.025

Other claims from this paper (1)

Observation At least six beta-carbolines were identified in the stem bark of Thai Picrasma javanica.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best plant height, 27.11 cm.

Taxon: Picrasma javanica BlumePicrasma javanicae0
Treatment: N0 treatment (without shading)e0
Outcome: plant heighte1
Direction: beste0
Value: 27.11 cme1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“N0 treatment (without shading) resulted the best growth response of Picrasma javanica Blume seedling”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–861

e1
“plant height 27.11 cm”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–921

Title

Respon Pertumbuhan Bibit Picrasma javanica Blume terhadap Intensitas Naungan dan Media Tanam

Ninik Setyowati; Ning Wikan Utami Journal of Biota 2009. doi:10.24002/biota.v14i1.2628

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best leaf number, 15.57.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best trunk diameter, 4.32 mm.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best root length, 15.97 cm.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best shoot dry weight, 1.762 g.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best root dry weight, 0.688 g.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best seedling quality index, 0.277.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 (1 soil:2 manure:1 compost) gave plant height of 25.05 cm versus 19.10 cm in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a leaf number of 16.53 versus 9.20 in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a trunk diameter of 3.89 mm versus 2.76 mm in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a root length of 15.23 cm versus 12.71 cm in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a shoot dry weight of 1.58 g versus 0.663 g in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a root dry weight of 0.51 g versus 0.221 g in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a seedling quality index of 0.220 versus 0.089 in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best plant height, 36.14 cm.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best leaf number, 28.2.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best trunk diameter, 4.7 mm.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best root length, 16.7 cm.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best shoot dry weight, 3 g.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best root dry weight, 0.92 g.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best leaf number, 15.57.

Taxon: Picrasma javanica BlumePicrasma javanicae0
Treatment: N0 treatment (without shading)e0
Outcome: leaf numbere1
Direction: beste0
Value: 15.57e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“N0 treatment (without shading) resulted the best growth response of Picrasma javanica Blume seedling”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–861

e1
“leaf number 15.57”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–940

Title

Respon Pertumbuhan Bibit Picrasma javanica Blume terhadap Intensitas Naungan dan Media Tanam

Ninik Setyowati; Ning Wikan Utami Journal of Biota 2009. doi:10.24002/biota.v14i1.2628

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best plant height, 27.11 cm.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best trunk diameter, 4.32 mm.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best root length, 15.97 cm.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best shoot dry weight, 1.762 g.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best root dry weight, 0.688 g.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best seedling quality index, 0.277.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 (1 soil:2 manure:1 compost) gave plant height of 25.05 cm versus 19.10 cm in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a leaf number of 16.53 versus 9.20 in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a trunk diameter of 3.89 mm versus 2.76 mm in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a root length of 15.23 cm versus 12.71 cm in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a shoot dry weight of 1.58 g versus 0.663 g in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a root dry weight of 0.51 g versus 0.221 g in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a seedling quality index of 0.220 versus 0.089 in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best plant height, 36.14 cm.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best leaf number, 28.2.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best trunk diameter, 4.7 mm.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best root length, 16.7 cm.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best shoot dry weight, 3 g.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best root dry weight, 0.92 g.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best trunk diameter, 4.32 mm.

Taxon: Picrasma javanica BlumePicrasma javanicae0
Treatment: N0 treatment (without shading)e0
Outcome: diameter of trunke1
Direction: beste0
Value: 4.32 mme1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“N0 treatment (without shading) resulted the best growth response of Picrasma javanica Blume seedling”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–861

e1
“diameter of trunk 4.32 mm”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–967

Title

Respon Pertumbuhan Bibit Picrasma javanica Blume terhadap Intensitas Naungan dan Media Tanam

Ninik Setyowati; Ning Wikan Utami Journal of Biota 2009. doi:10.24002/biota.v14i1.2628

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best plant height, 27.11 cm.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best leaf number, 15.57.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best root length, 15.97 cm.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best shoot dry weight, 1.762 g.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best root dry weight, 0.688 g.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best seedling quality index, 0.277.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 (1 soil:2 manure:1 compost) gave plant height of 25.05 cm versus 19.10 cm in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a leaf number of 16.53 versus 9.20 in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a trunk diameter of 3.89 mm versus 2.76 mm in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a root length of 15.23 cm versus 12.71 cm in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a shoot dry weight of 1.58 g versus 0.663 g in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a root dry weight of 0.51 g versus 0.221 g in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a seedling quality index of 0.220 versus 0.089 in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best plant height, 36.14 cm.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best leaf number, 28.2.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best trunk diameter, 4.7 mm.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best root length, 16.7 cm.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best shoot dry weight, 3 g.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best root dry weight, 0.92 g.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best root length, 15.97 cm.

Taxon: Picrasma javanica BlumePicrasma javanicae0
Treatment: N0 treatment (without shading)e0
Outcome: root lengthe1
Direction: beste0
Value: 15.97 cme1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“N0 treatment (without shading) resulted the best growth response of Picrasma javanica Blume seedling”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–861

e1
“root length of 15.97 cm”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–996

Title

Respon Pertumbuhan Bibit Picrasma javanica Blume terhadap Intensitas Naungan dan Media Tanam

Ninik Setyowati; Ning Wikan Utami Journal of Biota 2009. doi:10.24002/biota.v14i1.2628

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best plant height, 27.11 cm.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best leaf number, 15.57.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best trunk diameter, 4.32 mm.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best shoot dry weight, 1.762 g.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best root dry weight, 0.688 g.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best seedling quality index, 0.277.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 (1 soil:2 manure:1 compost) gave plant height of 25.05 cm versus 19.10 cm in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a leaf number of 16.53 versus 9.20 in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a trunk diameter of 3.89 mm versus 2.76 mm in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a root length of 15.23 cm versus 12.71 cm in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a shoot dry weight of 1.58 g versus 0.663 g in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a root dry weight of 0.51 g versus 0.221 g in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a seedling quality index of 0.220 versus 0.089 in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best plant height, 36.14 cm.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best leaf number, 28.2.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best trunk diameter, 4.7 mm.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best root length, 16.7 cm.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best shoot dry weight, 3 g.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best root dry weight, 0.92 g.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best shoot dry weight, 1.762 g.

Taxon: Picrasma javanica BlumePicrasma javanicae0
Treatment: N0 treatment (without shading)e0
Outcome: shoot dry weighte1
Direction: beste0
Value: 1.762 ge1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“N0 treatment (without shading) resulted the best growth response of Picrasma javanica Blume seedling”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–861

e1
“shoot dry weight of 1.762 g”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1025

Title

Respon Pertumbuhan Bibit Picrasma javanica Blume terhadap Intensitas Naungan dan Media Tanam

Ninik Setyowati; Ning Wikan Utami Journal of Biota 2009. doi:10.24002/biota.v14i1.2628

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best plant height, 27.11 cm.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best leaf number, 15.57.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best trunk diameter, 4.32 mm.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best root length, 15.97 cm.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best root dry weight, 0.688 g.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best seedling quality index, 0.277.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 (1 soil:2 manure:1 compost) gave plant height of 25.05 cm versus 19.10 cm in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a leaf number of 16.53 versus 9.20 in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a trunk diameter of 3.89 mm versus 2.76 mm in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a root length of 15.23 cm versus 12.71 cm in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a shoot dry weight of 1.58 g versus 0.663 g in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a root dry weight of 0.51 g versus 0.221 g in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a seedling quality index of 0.220 versus 0.089 in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best plant height, 36.14 cm.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best leaf number, 28.2.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best trunk diameter, 4.7 mm.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best root length, 16.7 cm.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best shoot dry weight, 3 g.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best root dry weight, 0.92 g.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best root dry weight, 0.688 g.

Taxon: Picrasma javanica BlumePicrasma javanicae0
Treatment: N0 treatment (without shading)e0
Outcome: root dry weighte1
Direction: beste0
Value: 0.688 ge1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“N0 treatment (without shading) resulted the best growth response of Picrasma javanica Blume seedling”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–861

e1
“root dry weight of 0.688 g”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1053

Title

Respon Pertumbuhan Bibit Picrasma javanica Blume terhadap Intensitas Naungan dan Media Tanam

Ninik Setyowati; Ning Wikan Utami Journal of Biota 2009. doi:10.24002/biota.v14i1.2628

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best plant height, 27.11 cm.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best leaf number, 15.57.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best trunk diameter, 4.32 mm.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best root length, 15.97 cm.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best shoot dry weight, 1.762 g.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best seedling quality index, 0.277.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 (1 soil:2 manure:1 compost) gave plant height of 25.05 cm versus 19.10 cm in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a leaf number of 16.53 versus 9.20 in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a trunk diameter of 3.89 mm versus 2.76 mm in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a root length of 15.23 cm versus 12.71 cm in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a shoot dry weight of 1.58 g versus 0.663 g in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a root dry weight of 0.51 g versus 0.221 g in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a seedling quality index of 0.220 versus 0.089 in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best plant height, 36.14 cm.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best leaf number, 28.2.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best trunk diameter, 4.7 mm.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best root length, 16.7 cm.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best shoot dry weight, 3 g.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best root dry weight, 0.92 g.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best seedling quality index, 0.277.

Taxon: Picrasma javanica BlumePicrasma javanicae0
Treatment: N0 treatment (without shading)e0
Outcome: seedling quality indexe1
Direction: beste0
Value: 0.277e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“N0 treatment (without shading) resulted the best growth response of Picrasma javanica Blume seedling”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–861

e1
“seedling quality index of 0.277”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1089

Title

Respon Pertumbuhan Bibit Picrasma javanica Blume terhadap Intensitas Naungan dan Media Tanam

Ninik Setyowati; Ning Wikan Utami Journal of Biota 2009. doi:10.24002/biota.v14i1.2628

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best plant height, 27.11 cm.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best leaf number, 15.57.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best trunk diameter, 4.32 mm.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best root length, 15.97 cm.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best shoot dry weight, 1.762 g.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best root dry weight, 0.688 g.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 (1 soil:2 manure:1 compost) gave plant height of 25.05 cm versus 19.10 cm in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a leaf number of 16.53 versus 9.20 in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a trunk diameter of 3.89 mm versus 2.76 mm in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a root length of 15.23 cm versus 12.71 cm in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a shoot dry weight of 1.58 g versus 0.663 g in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a root dry weight of 0.51 g versus 0.221 g in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a seedling quality index of 0.220 versus 0.089 in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best plant height, 36.14 cm.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best leaf number, 28.2.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best trunk diameter, 4.7 mm.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best root length, 16.7 cm.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best shoot dry weight, 3 g.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best root dry weight, 0.92 g.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth medium M5 (1 soil:2 manure:1 compost) gave plant height of 25.05 cm versus 19.10 cm in the soil-only control M1.

Taxon: Picrasma javanica BlumePicrasma javanicat0
Treatment: M5 (1-soil:2 manure:1 compost)e0
Outcome: plant heighte1
Direction: bettere0
Value: 25.05 cme1
Qualifier: M1= 19.10 cme1
Comparator: control (M1, soil media)e0

Verbatim

t0
“Picrasma javanica Blume”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–48

e0
“M5 (1-soil:2 manure:1 compost) showed the positive response on the growth of seedling better than other treatments and different with control (M1, soil media)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1280

e1
“plant height 25.05 cm (M1= 19.10 cm)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1358

Title

Respon Pertumbuhan Bibit Picrasma javanica Blume terhadap Intensitas Naungan dan Media Tanam

Ninik Setyowati; Ning Wikan Utami Journal of Biota 2009. doi:10.24002/biota.v14i1.2628

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best plant height, 27.11 cm.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best leaf number, 15.57.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best trunk diameter, 4.32 mm.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best root length, 15.97 cm.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best shoot dry weight, 1.762 g.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best root dry weight, 0.688 g.
Intervention effect Without shading (N0), Picrasma javanica seedlings had the best seedling quality index, 0.277.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a leaf number of 16.53 versus 9.20 in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a trunk diameter of 3.89 mm versus 2.76 mm in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a root length of 15.23 cm versus 12.71 cm in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a shoot dry weight of 1.58 g versus 0.663 g in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a root dry weight of 0.51 g versus 0.221 g in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect Growth medium M5 gave a seedling quality index of 0.220 versus 0.089 in the soil-only control M1.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best plant height, 36.14 cm.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best leaf number, 28.2.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best trunk diameter, 4.7 mm.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best root length, 16.7 cm.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best shoot dry weight, 3 g.
Intervention effect The combination of no shading (N0) and medium M5 (1:2:1) gave the best root dry weight, 0.92 g.