Paper · 2012 · Agricultural science digest

Effect of gibberellic acid on fruit quality and storability of grape in semi-arid region of Punjab.

Vijay Singh Meena; V. Eyarkai Nambi; RAMANUJ VISHAWAKARMA; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field trial was conducted on perlette cultivar of grape under sandy loam soil during the season of 2010-2011. Gibberellic acid (GA3) @ 20, 25, and 50 ppm concentration was applied during fruit development stage along with control (spraying with tap water). Yield /vines were significantly increased (12.23%) by 25 ppm application of GA3 and gave the best results in comparison with control. TSS and Acidity was remain unchanged with the application of GA3 while, lowest weight loss (2.12%) was observed with the spray of 20 ppm.The same treatment proved again as most effective in reducing decay percentage (0.16%) up to third week of storage of grape.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 25 ppm raised yield per vine by 12.23% relative to water control.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
25 ppm application of GA3e0
Outcome
Yield /vinese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.23%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Yield /vines were significantly increased (12.23%) by 25 ppm application of GA3 and gave the best results in comparison with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–391 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TSS was unchanged by GA3.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
application of GA3e0
Outcome
TSSe0
Direction
unchangede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“TSS and Acidity was remain unchanged with the application of GA3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–457 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acidity was unchanged by GA3.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
application of GA3e0
Outcome
Aciditye0
Direction
unchangede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“TSS and Acidity was remain unchanged with the application of GA3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–457 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 20 ppm yielded the lowest weight loss of 2.12%.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
spray of 20 ppme0
Outcome
weight losse0
Direction
loweste0
Value
2.12%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“lowest weight loss (2.12%) was observed with the spray of 20 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 20 ppm spray reduced decay to 0.16% through week three of grape storage.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
same treatmente0
Outcome
decay percentagee0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
0.16%e0
Qualifier
up to third week of storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The same treatment proved again as most effective in reducing decay percentage (0.16%) up to third week of storage of grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–653 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults differ

21 papers: 16 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Gibberellic acid · yield · VitisResults differ

47 papers: 39 positive, 8 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

application · quality: postharvest · VitisResults agree

25 papers: 25 positive, 0 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.