Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Growth, yield and quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum) as influenced by organic sources of nitrogen nutrition

RAJEEW KUMAR; D.S. PANDEY; .V.P. SINGH; et al.

17
claims
27
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiments were conducted for five years from 2003-04 to 2007-08, during rabi seasons at G.B. Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar, on Mollisols under the Tarai region of the Uttarakhand, to study the effect of organic sources of nitrogen nutrition on growth, productivity and quality of wheat {Triticum aestivum (L.) emend. Fiori & Paol}, PBW 343. Fourteen treatments with three replications were laid out in a randomized block design (fixed plot). Four nitrogen doses i.e. 125, 100, 75 and 50% of the recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN=150 kg/ha) were applied through each of the three organic sources i.e. FYM, vermicompost and neemax. Urea as inorganic source for recommended nitrogen and control (no nitrogen) was also tested for comparison of the results. The study showed that RDN through urea gave maximum wheat yield (4.63 t/ha), which was signifi- cantly higher than other treatments. Among the organic sources of nitrogen nutrition, FYM @ 125% of RDN gave maximum wheat yield (3.65 t/ha), which was at par with vermicompost and neemax at same rate but significantly higher than FYM @ 50% of RDN. Morphological determinants viz. emergence count/m2, plant height (cm), dry matter accumulation (g/m2) and yield contributing characters, i.e., spike/m2, grains/spike1 and 1,000-grains weight (g) were also significantly higher under N nutrition through urea than others, but FYM, vermicompost and neemax @ 125% of RDN gave significantly higher value of these parameters than their respective nitrogen nutrition @ 50% . Protein content, protein yield, nitrogen uptake and nitrogen use efficiency indicators, which higher under ni- trogen nutrition through urea, than those under organic sources of nitrogen. Among the organic sources, vermicompost resulted in maximum value of protein content, protein yield and nitrogen harvest index than others. However, nitrogen use efficiency indicators i.e., physiological, agronomic and recovery efficiency were higher un- der FYM treated plots. All of the organic treatments except 50% of RDN through neemax and 50% of RDN through vermicompost were highly promising. All the treatments except control maintained a positive balance of nitrogen in soil. High cost involved in procuring large quantity of FYM and vermicompost resulted in negative net returns un- der these treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea at recommended nitrogen dose produced maximum wheat yield of 4.63 t/ha, significantly above other treatments.

Treatment
RDN through ureae0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4.63 t/hae0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RDN through urea gave maximum wheat yield (4.63 t/ha), which was signifi- cantly higher than other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–920 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM at 125% of RDN produced maximum organic-source wheat yield of 3.65 t/ha.

Treatment
FYM @ 125% of RDNe0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3.65 t/hae0
Comparator
organic sources of nitrogen nutritione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the organic sources of nitrogen nutrition, FYM @ 125% of RDN gave maximum wheat yield (3.65 t/ha), which was at par with vermicompost and neemax at same rate but significantly higher than FYM @ 50% of RDN.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM at 125% of RDN had wheat yield at par with vermicompost at the same rate.

Treatment
FYM @ 125% of RDNe0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
vermicomposte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FYM @ 125% of RDN gave maximum wheat yield (3.65 t/ha), which was at par with vermicompost and neemax at same rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1084 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM at 125% of RDN had wheat yield at par with neemax at the same rate.

Treatment
FYM @ 125% of RDNe0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
neemaxe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FYM @ 125% of RDN gave maximum wheat yield (3.65 t/ha), which was at par with vermicompost and neemax at same rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1084 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM at 125% of RDN yielded significantly more wheat than FYM at 50%.

Treatment
FYM @ 125% of RDNe0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
FYM @ 50% of RDNe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FYM @ 125% of RDN gave maximum wheat yield (3.65 t/ha), which was at par with vermicompost and neemax at same rate but significantly higher than FYM @ 50% of RDN.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea significantly increased emergence, height, and dry matter relative to other nitrogen sources.

Treatment
N nutrition through ureae0
Outcome
emergence count/m2, plant height (cm), dry matter accumulation (g/m2)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
otherse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Morphological determinants viz. emergence count/m2, plant height (cm), dry matter accumulation (g/m2) and yield contributing characters, i.e., spike/m2, grains/spike1 and 1,000-grains weight (g) were also significantly higher under N nutrition through urea than others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea significantly increased wheat spikes, grains per spike, and thousand-grain weight relative to other sources.

Treatment
N nutrition through ureae0
Outcome
spike/m2, grains/spike1 and 1,000-grains weight (g)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
otherse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“yield contributing characters, i.e., spike/m2, grains/spike1 and 1,000-grains weight (g) were also significantly higher under N nutrition through urea than others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 125% RDN, FYM increased the listed morphology and yield components over its 50% dose.

Treatment
FYMe0
Outcome
these parameterse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
50%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“FYM, vermicompost and neemax @ 125% of RDN gave significantly higher value of these parameters than their respective nitrogen nutrition @ 50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1548 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 125% RDN, vermicompost increased the listed morphology and yield components over its 50% dose.

Treatment
vermicomposte0
Outcome
these parameterse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
50%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“FYM, vermicompost and neemax @ 125% of RDN gave significantly higher value of these parameters than their respective nitrogen nutrition @ 50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1548 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 125% RDN, neemax increased the listed morphology and yield components over its 50% dose.

Treatment
neemaxe0
Outcome
these parameterse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
50%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“FYM, vermicompost and neemax @ 125% of RDN gave significantly higher value of these parameters than their respective nitrogen nutrition @ 50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1548 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea exceeded organic sources for wheat protein content, protein yield, and nitrogen uptake.

Treatment
ureae0
Outcome
Protein content, protein yield, nitrogen uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
organic sources of nitrogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“Protein content, protein yield, nitrogen uptake and nitrogen use efficiency indicators, which higher under ni- trogen nutrition through urea, than those under organic sources of nitrogen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1738 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea exceeded organic sources for nitrogen use efficiency indicators.

Treatment
ureae0
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiency indicatorse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
organic sources of nitrogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“nitrogen use efficiency indicators, which higher under ni- trogen nutrition through urea, than those under organic sources of nitrogen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1738 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost maximized protein content, protein yield, and nitrogen harvest index among organic sources.

Treatment
vermicomposte0
Outcome
protein content, protein yield and nitrogen harvest indexe0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
otherse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“Among the organic sources, vermicompost resulted in maximum value of protein content, protein yield and nitrogen harvest index than others.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1739–1878 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM had higher physiological, agronomic, and recovery efficiency.

Treatment
FYMe0
Outcome
physiological, agronomic and recovery efficiencye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“nitrogen use efficiency indicators i.e., physiological, agronomic and recovery efficiency were higher un- der FYM treated plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1888–2016 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic treatments other than 50% RDN neemax and 50% RDN vermicompost were judged promising.

Outcome
highly promisinge0
Qualifier
except 50% of RDN through neemax and 50% of RDN through vermicomposte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“All of the organic treatments except 50% of RDN through neemax and 50% of RDN through vermicompost were highly promising.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2017–2138 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All nitrogen treatments except control maintained a positive soil nitrogen balance.

Outcome
positive balance of nitrogen in soile0
Qualifier
except controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“All the treatments except control maintained a positive balance of nitrogen in soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2139–2223 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High procurement cost of FYM and vermicompost caused negative net returns for these treatments.

Treatment
FYM and vermicomposte0
Outcome
negative net returnse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“High cost involved in procuring large quantity of FYM and vermicompost resulted in negative net returns un- der these treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2224–2353 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

174 papers: 127 positive, 47 negative or no effect

126 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

454 papers: 400 positive, 54 negative or no effect

399 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

450 papers more in this group

See all 454 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

500 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.