Paper · 2014 · American Journal of Life Sciences

Controlling of Mango Powdery Mildew by some Salts, Growth Regulators and the Biofungicide AQ10 Compared with Punch Fungicide in Egypt

Azza M. K. Azmy

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two experiments on 10 years old mango trees, Saddeka cv. (high susceptible cultivar) were conducted under field condition during 2012 and 2013 growing seasons for management of powdery mildew at El Adleia district, Belbees county, El-Sharkia governorate. In these trials, mango trees were sprayed with two potassium phosphate salts , calcium chloride ,three commercial growth regulators ,i.e. Agrotone (NAA), Cultar (paclobutrazol) , and Berelex (GA3), the bio-fungicide AQ10 (Ampelomyces quisqualis) , the commercial systemic fungicide Punch (flusilazole) and an alternate among Cultar ( paclobutrazol ), monobasic phosphate and the fungicide Punch. The aforementioned treatments were applied at 14 days intervals during both growing seasons starting at bud flower burst stage till full bloom stage in order to evaluate their efficiency on management mango powdery mildew disease. The obtained results showed that spraying of mango trees ( Saddeka cv.) during 2012 and 2013 growing seasons with any of the tested treatments significantly reduced the severity of powdery mildew with significant increase to the produced fruit yield compared with control treatment.In addition, results of both seasons revealed that alternation spray among Cultar ( paclobutrazol ), mono basic potassium phosphate and the fungicide Punch was the most superior treatment in reducing severity of the disease and producing the highest fruit yield followed by spraying of the fungicide Punch then spraying of mono basic potassium phosphate . Meanwhile, Brelex was of the lowest efficiency treatment in this regard followed by spraying of Agrotone . The other treatments recorded intermediate figures. Control treatment recorded 44.3 % disease severity and produced poor fruit yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The tested sprays reduced mango powdery mildew severity relative to the control in both seasons.

Taxon
mango treesMangifera indicae0
Material
Saddeka cv.e0
Treatment
any of the tested treatmentse0
Outcome
severity of powdery mildewe0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
during 2012 and 2013 growing seasonse0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying of mango trees ( Saddeka cv.) during 2012 and 2013 growing seasons with any of the tested treatments significantly reduced the severity of powdery mildew with significant increase to the produced fruit yield compared with control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The tested sprays increased mango fruit yield relative to the control in both seasons.

Taxon
mango treesMangifera indicae0
Material
Saddeka cv.e0
Treatment
any of the tested treatmentse0
Outcome
produced fruit yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
during 2012 and 2013 growing seasonse0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying of mango trees ( Saddeka cv.) during 2012 and 2013 growing seasons with any of the tested treatments significantly reduced the severity of powdery mildew with significant increase to the produced fruit yield compared with control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternating Cultar, monobasic potassium phosphate and Punch gave the greatest reduction in disease severity.

Treatment
alternation spray among Cultar ( paclobutrazol ), mono basic potassium phosphate and the fungicide Punche0
Outcome
severity of the diseasee0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“alternation spray among Cultar ( paclobutrazol ), mono basic potassium phosphate and the fungicide Punch was the most superior treatment in reducing severity of the disease and producing the highest fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1425 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternating Cultar, monobasic potassium phosphate and Punch gave the highest fruit yield.

Treatment
alternation spray among Cultar ( paclobutrazol ), mono basic potassium phosphate and the fungicide Punche0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alternation spray among Cultar ( paclobutrazol ), mono basic potassium phosphate and the fungicide Punch was the most superior treatment in reducing severity of the disease and producing the highest fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1425 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–20 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Punch ranked after the alternating spray, followed by monobasic potassium phosphate for disease control and yield.

Outcome
spraying of the fungicide Punch then spraying of mono basic potassium phosphatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by spraying of the fungicide Punch then spraying of mono basic potassium phosphate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1517 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–20 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brelex had the lowest efficiency, followed by Agrotone.

Outcome
lowest efficiency treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brelex was of the lowest efficiency treatment in this regard followed by spraying of Agrotone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1624 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–20 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated mango had 44.3% powdery mildew severity.

Treatment
Control treatmente0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Value
44.3 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Control treatment recorded 44.3 % disease severity and produced poor fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1679–1759 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango Powdery Mildew”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–35 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated mango had poor fruit yield.

Treatment
Control treatmente0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
poore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Control treatment recorded 44.3 % disease severity and produced poor fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1679–1759 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–20 · show in text ↑

paclobutrazol · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ

51 papers: 44 positive, 7 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

paclobutrazol · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fungicide · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 39 positive, 3 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

application · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 80 positive, 5 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

fungicide · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.