Paper · 2009 · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)

A consortium of siderophore-producing bacterial strains from the rhizosphere of rice plants induces systemic resistance in rice against sheath blight disease.

Zakira Naureen; Fauzia Yusuf Hafeez; Michael Roberts

13
claims
21
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Rice (Oryza sativa) is a major crop in much of the developing world where disease management using pesticides is not economically practical nor environmentally safe. The identification of biocontrol agents therefore presents a useful alternative. Here, we have screened bacterial strains isolated from the rhizosphere of rice plants, and identified a number of these that exhibit antagonistic activity towards the fungal pathogen, Rhizoctonia solani, the causative agent of rice sheath blight disease. Antagonism was strongly correlated with the quantity of siderophores produced by individual strains, and was increased under iron-limiting conditions. Selected high-siderophore-producing strains Bacillus subtilis SPS2, Bacillus cereus Z2-7, Enterobacter sp. SPR7 and Aeromonas hydrophilla BPS10 were found to promote the growth of rice plants, possibly via the solubilisation of soil phosphates, nitrogen fixation and the production of phytohormones. These same plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) also conferred resistance against sheath blight disease, which resulted in significant yield increases in infected plants. A consortium of these selected strains was especially effective in both growth promotion and disease suppression, and generally performed better than treatment with the fungicide, benlate. Molecular analysis indicated that the PGPR strains tested enhanced expression of chitinases, peroxidases and glucanases in rice, and may therefore activate induced systemic resistance in this plant species. Our work has identified a series of rhizobacterial strains able to promote growth and provide effective resistance against sheath blight disease in rice and which therefore have potential for application as biocontrol agents in agriculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Several rice rhizosphere strains antagonized Rhizoctonia solani.

Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
antagonistic activity towards the fungal pathogen, Rhizoctonia solanie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“identified a number of these that exhibit antagonistic activity towards the fungal pathogen, Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–449 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antagonism correlated strongly with siderophore quantity.

Compound
siderophorese0
Outcome
Antagonisme0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Antagonism was strongly correlated with the quantity of siderophores produced by individual strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–601 · show in text ↑
e1

“rhizosphere of rice plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron limitation increased antagonism.

Treatment
iron-limiting conditionse0
Outcome
Antagonisme0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Antagonism was strongly correlated with the quantity of siderophores produced by individual strains, and was increased under iron-limiting conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–651 · show in text ↑
e1

“rhizosphere of rice plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis SPS2 promoted rice growth.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilis SPS2e0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilis SPS2Bacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth of rice plantse0
Direction
promotee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus subtilis SPS2, Bacillus cereus Z2-7, Enterobacter sp. SPR7 and Aeromonas hydrophilla BPS10 were found to promote the growth of rice plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus cereus Z2-7 promoted rice growth.

Treatment
Bacillus cereus Z2-7e0
Interactor
Bacillus cereus Z2-7Bacillus cereuse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth of rice plantse0
Direction
promotee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus cereus
Bacillus cereus · InteractorMogana Das Murtey and Patchamuthu Ramasamy · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus subtilis SPS2, Bacillus cereus Z2-7, Enterobacter sp. SPR7 and Aeromonas hydrophilla BPS10 were found to promote the growth of rice plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enterobacter sp. SPR7 promoted rice growth.

Treatment
Enterobacter sp. SPR7e0
Interactor
Enterobacter sp. SPR7Enterobacter sp. SPR7e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth of rice plantse0
Direction
promotee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Enterobacter sp. SPR7
Enterobacter sp. SPR7 · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus subtilis SPS2, Bacillus cereus Z2-7, Enterobacter sp. SPR7 and Aeromonas hydrophilla BPS10 were found to promote the growth of rice plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aeromonas hydrophilla BPS10 promoted rice growth.

Treatment
Aeromonas hydrophilla BPS10e0
Interactor
Aeromonas hydrophilla BPS10e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth of rice plantse0
Direction
promotee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus subtilis SPS2, Bacillus cereus Z2-7, Enterobacter sp. SPR7 and Aeromonas hydrophilla BPS10 were found to promote the growth of rice plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These rhizobacteria conferred resistance to sheath blight.

Treatment
plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)e0
Interactor
rhizobacteriaHyphomicrobialese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
resistance against sheath blight diseasee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These same plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) also conferred resistance against sheath blight disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1063 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of rice plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistance induced by PGPR significantly increased yield in infected rice.

Treatment
plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)e0
Interactor
rhizobacteriaHyphomicrobialese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These same plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) also conferred resistance against sheath blight disease, which resulted in significant yield increases in infected plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1129 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of rice plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The selected-strain consortium was especially effective for growth promotion.

Treatment
consortium of these selected strainse0
Outcome
growth promotione0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
treatment with the fungicide, benlatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A consortium of these selected strains was especially effective in both growth promotion and disease suppression, and generally performed better than treatment with the fungicide, benlate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1318 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of rice plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The selected-strain consortium was especially effective for disease suppression and generally better than benlate.

Treatment
consortium of these selected strainse0
Outcome
disease suppressione0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
treatment with the fungicide, benlatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A consortium of these selected strains was especially effective in both growth promotion and disease suppression, and generally performed better than treatment with the fungicide, benlate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1318 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of rice plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR enhanced chitinase, peroxidase and glucanase expression in rice.

Treatment
PGPR strainse0
Gene
chitinases, peroxidases and glucanasese0
Outcome
expression of chitinases, peroxidases and glucanasese0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PGPR strains tested enhanced expression of chitinases, peroxidases and glucanases in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1447 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest PGPR may activate induced systemic resistance.

Outcome
induced systemic resistancee0
Qualifier
may therefore activatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“may therefore activate induced systemic resistance in this plant species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1525 · show in text ↑
e1

“PGPR strains tested enhanced expression of chitinases, peroxidases and glucanases in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1447 · show in text ↑

Enterobacter · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Bacillus cereus · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

inoculation · molecular: expression · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 51 positive, 5 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

inoculation · Hyphomicrobiales · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.