Paper · 2013 · Acta Horticulturae

EFFECT OF MATURITY STAGE AND CULTIVAR ON THE EFFICACY OF 1-MCP TREATMENTS IN MANGO FRUITS

J. Ambuko; R.W. Githiga; M.J. Hutchnison; et al.

12
claims
28
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) is one of the postharvest technologies employed in postharvest systems to extend the shelf life of perishable commodities and minimize postharvest losses. Efficacy of 1-MCP is affected by various preharvest factors including species, cultivar and maturity stage of the commodities. In the present study, two commercial mango cultivars, 'Tommy Atkins' and 'Apple Mango' were harvested at two maturity stages. Flesh color and shoulder position were the maturity indices used to define the two stages as stage 1 (mature green) and 2 (advanced maturity). Within 24 hours of harvesting from a commercial farm, a homogenous sample of fruits of both cultivars were subjected to 1-MCP at 1 ppm for a duration of 24 hours and then allowed to ripen at ambient room conditions in comparison to untreated controls. A random sample of 5 fruits was taken every two days for determination of ethylene evolution and respiration rate until the end of storage, defined by marketability of the fruits. Sampling for other ripening-related physical and biochemical changes including firmness, cumulative weight loss, color (hue angle), total soluble solids (°Brix) and titratable acidity was done every 3 days until the end of the storage period. The results showed no varietal differences in response to 1-MCP between 'Tommy Atkins' and 'Apple Mango'. However, the response to 1-MCP treatment was significantly affected by the stage of maturity. Fruits harvested at stage 1 showed significant 1-MCP treatment effect, while no treatment effect was evident in fruits harvested at stage 2. In both cultivars, 1-MCP treated fruits (stage 1) had significantly lower respiration rates with a 3 to 4-day lag to the respiratory climacteric peak compared to untreated controls. Further, the flesh of 1-MCP treated fruits remained firmer and retained a higher hue angle throughout the observation period in both varieties. 1-MCP treatment also delayed other ripening related biochemical changes as evidenced by lower °Brix and higher titratable acidity in treated fruits. The results show the efficacy of 1-MCP in prolonging the postharvest shelf life of the two cultivars of mango fruits. However, this effect was significantly affected by the stage of maturity of the fruits which should be considered while designing 1-MCP treatment regimes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two cultivars showed no difference in response to 1-MCP.

Material
'Tommy Atkins' and 'Apple Mango'e0
Outcome
no varietal differences in response to 1-MCPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“MANGO FRUITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“The results showed no varietal differences in response to 1-MCP between 'Tommy Atkins' and 'Apple Mango'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1359 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maturity stage significantly affected response to 1-MCP.

Organ / stage
stage of maturitye0
Outcome
response to 1-MCP treatmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“MANGO FRUITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“the response to 1-MCP treatment was significantly affected by the stage of maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1453 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stage 1 fruit showed a significant 1-MCP treatment effect.

Organ / stage
stage 1e0
Outcome
1-MCP treatment effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“MANGO FRUITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruits harvested at stage 1 showed significant 1-MCP treatment effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1524 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stage 2 fruit showed no evident treatment effect.

Organ / stage
stage 2e0
Outcome
no treatment effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“MANGO FRUITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“no treatment effect was evident in fruits harvested at stage 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1532–1594 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At stage 1, treated fruit had lower respiration rates than untreated controls.

Organ / stage
stage 1e0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
respiration ratese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
untreated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“MANGO FRUITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“In both cultivars, 1-MCP treated fruits (stage 1) had significantly lower respiration rates with a 3 to 4-day lag to the respiratory climacteric peak compared to untreated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1596–1776 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At stage 1, treated fruit had a 3 to 4-day lag to the respiratory climacteric peak.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
respiratory climacteric peake0
Direction
lage0
Value
3 to 4-daye0
Comparator
untreated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“MANGO FRUITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“1-MCP treated fruits (stage 1) had significantly lower respiration rates with a 3 to 4-day lag to the respiratory climacteric peak compared to untreated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1776 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP fruit flesh remained firmer throughout observation.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
fleshe0
Direction
firmere0
Comparator
untreated controlse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“MANGO FRUITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“the flesh of 1-MCP treated fruits remained firmer and retained a higher hue angle throughout the observation period in both varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1787–1920 · show in text ↑
e1

“in comparison to untreated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–830 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP fruit retained a higher hue angle.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
hue anglee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
untreated controlse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“MANGO FRUITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“the flesh of 1-MCP treated fruits remained firmer and retained a higher hue angle throughout the observation period in both varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1787–1920 · show in text ↑
e1

“in comparison to untreated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–830 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP treated fruit had lower °Brix.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
°Brixe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
untreated controlse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“MANGO FRUITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“1-MCP treatment also delayed other ripening related biochemical changes as evidenced by lower °Brix and higher titratable acidity in treated fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1922–2069 · show in text ↑
e1

“in comparison to untreated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–830 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP treated fruit had higher titratable acidity.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
titratable aciditye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
untreated controlse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“MANGO FRUITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“1-MCP treatment also delayed other ripening related biochemical changes as evidenced by lower °Brix and higher titratable acidity in treated fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1922–2069 · show in text ↑
e1

“in comparison to untreated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–830 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP prolonged postharvest shelf life of both mango cultivars.

Outcome
postharvest shelf lifee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“MANGO FRUITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“The results show the efficacy of 1-MCP in prolonging the postharvest shelf life of the two cultivars of mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2071–2187 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Maturity stage should be considered when designing 1-MCP treatment regimes.

Outcome
stage of maturity of the fruits which should be considered while designing 1-MCP treatment regimese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“MANGO FRUITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“stage of maturity of the fruits which should be considered while designing 1-MCP treatment regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2244–2342 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ

24 papers: 21 positive, 3 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ

36 papers: 35 positive, 1 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: respiration · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.