Paper · 2007 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

High ear number is key to achieving high wheat yields in the high-rainfall zone of south-western Australia

Heping Zhang; Neil C. Turner; Michael L. Poole; et al.

10
claims
13
verbatim quotes
33
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The growth and yield of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were examined to determine the actual and potential yields of wheat at a site in the high rainfall zone (HRZ) of south-western Australia. Spring wheat achieved yields of 5.5-5.9 t/ha in 2001 and 2003 when subsurface waterlogging was absent or minimal. These yields were close to the estimated potential, indicating that a high yield potential is achievable. In 2002 when subsurface waterlogging occurred early in the growing season, the yield of spring wheat was 40% lower than the estimated potential. The yield of wheat was significantly correlated with the number of ears per m2 (r2 = 0.81) and dry matter at anthesis (r2 = 0.73). To achieve 5–6 t/ha of yield of wheat in the HRZ, 450–550 ears per m2 and 10–11 t/ha dry matter at anthesis should be targetted. Attaining such a level of dry matter at anthesis did not have a negative effect on dry-matter accumulation during the post-anthesis period. The harvest index (0.36-0.38) of spring wheat was comparable with that in drier parts of south-western Australia, but relatively low given the high rainfall and the long growing season. This relatively low harvest index indicates that the selected cultivar bred for the low- and medium-rainfall zone in this study, when grown in the HRZ, may have genetic limitations in sink capacity arising from the low grain number per ear. We suggest that the yield of wheat in the HRZ may be increased further by increasing the sink capacity by increasing the number of grains per ear.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring wheat yielded 5.5-5.9 t/ha in 2001 and 2003, when subsurface waterlogging was absent or minimal.

Taxon
Spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
yieldse1
Value
5.5-5.9 t/hae1
Qualifier
when subsurface waterlogging was absent or minimale1
Setting
a site in the high rainfall zone (HRZ) of south-western Australiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at a site in the high rainfall zone (HRZ) of south-western Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 128–196 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spring wheat achieved yields of 5.5-5.9 t/ha in 2001 and 2003 when subsurface waterlogging was absent or minimal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsurface waterlogging early in 2002 lowered spring wheat yield by 40% below the estimated potential.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
subsurface waterlogging occurred early in the growing seasone2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
lowere2
Value
40%e2
Comparator
estimated potentiale2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“In 2002 when subsurface waterlogging occurred early in the growing season, the yield of spring wheat was 40% lower than the estimated potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–561 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield was significantly correlated with the number of ears per m2 (r2 = 0.81).

Organ / stage
earse3
Outcome
yielde3
Value
r2 = 0.81e3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The yield of wheat was significantly correlated with the number of ears per m2 (r2 = 0.81) and dry matter at anthesis (r2 = 0.73)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–692 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield was significantly correlated with dry matter at anthesis (r2 = 0.73).

Organ / stage
anthesise3
Outcome
yielde3
Value
r2 = 0.73e3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The yield of wheat was significantly correlated with the number of ears per m2 (r2 = 0.81) and dry matter at anthesis (r2 = 0.73)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–692 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

To reach 5-6 t/ha wheat yield in the high-rainfall zone, a target of 450-550 ears per m2 should be set.

Outcome
ears per m2e4
Value
450–550e4
Qualifier
5–6 t/hae4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“To achieve 5–6 t/ha of yield of wheat in the HRZ, 450–550 ears per m2 and 10–11 t/ha dry matter at anthesis should be targetted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–821 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

To reach 5-6 t/ha wheat yield in the high-rainfall zone, a target of 10-11 t/ha dry matter at anthesis should be set.

Outcome
dry matter at anthesise4
Value
10–11 t/hae4
Qualifier
5–6 t/hae4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“To achieve 5–6 t/ha of yield of wheat in the HRZ, 450–550 ears per m2 and 10–11 t/ha dry matter at anthesis should be targetted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–821 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter at anthesis at the target level did not reduce dry-matter accumulation after anthesis.

Treatment
Attaining such a level of dry matter at anthesise5
Outcome
dry-matter accumulation during the post-anthesis periode5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The yield of wheat was significantly correlated with the number of ears per m2 (r2 = 0.81) and dry matter at anthesis (r2 = 0.73)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–692 · show in text ↑
e5

“Attaining such a level of dry matter at anthesis did not have a negative effect on dry-matter accumulation during the post-anthesis period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–961 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index of spring wheat (0.36-0.38) was comparable with drier parts of south-western Australia.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume6
Outcome
harvest indexe6
Value
0.36-0.38e6
Qualifier
comparable with that in drier parts of south-western Australiae6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The harvest index (0.36-0.38) of spring wheat was comparable with that in drier parts of south-western Australia, but relatively low given the high rainfall and the long growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1147 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The selected cultivar bred for low- and medium-rainfall zones may have genetic limits on sink capacity from its low grain number per ear.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume6
Material
the selected cultivar bred for the low- and medium-rainfall zonee7
Outcome
sink capacitye7
Qualifier
low grain number per eare7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The harvest index (0.36-0.38) of spring wheat was comparable with that in drier parts of south-western Australia, but relatively low given the high rainfall and the long growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1147 · show in text ↑
e7

“This relatively low harvest index indicates that the selected cultivar bred for the low- and medium-rainfall zone in this study, when grown in the HRZ, may have genetic limitations in sink capacity arising from the low grain number per ear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1388 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield in the high-rainfall zone may be increased by increasing the number of grains per ear.

Outcome
number of grains per eare7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“We suggest that the yield of wheat in the HRZ may be increased further by increasing the sink capacity by increasing the number of grains per ear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1535 · show in text ↑

flooding · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 17 positive, 85 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

climate site · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 72 positive, 82 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 72 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.