Paper · 1989 · Journal of Environmental Quality

Direct Effects of Simulated Acid Rain on Sexual Reproduction in Corn

Denis T. DuBay

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The process of sexual reproduction in flowering plants often exposes pollen grains to the environment and the potential effects of atmospheric deposition. Experiments were designed to determine whether simulated acid rain treatments just before or after pollination could adversely influence reproductive processes and seed set in corn ( Zea mays L.). Container‐grown corn with sexually mature tassels and ears were exposed once to simulated rain at four pH levels for 1 h, beginning 1 h after artificial pollination or ending 10 min before artificial pollination. The single, artificial pollination deposited an average of 85 pollen grains per silk. Simulated rain treatment at pH 4.5, 3.5, or 2.5 after pollination reduced the percentage seed set of treated ears 7, 29, and 34%, respectively, as compared with pH 5.5. Simulated rain at pH 5.5 after pollination reduced seed set 24% as compared with no‐rain controls. The pH of simulated rain applied before pollination did not affect seed set, and pH 5.5 rain applied before pollination had no effects on seed set compared to no‐rain controls. Microscopic observations indicated that pollen germination and pollen tube penetration of the silk were completed by the time the rain treatments began 1 h after pollination. This infers that simulated acid rain influenced pollen tubes after they entered the silks. These results suggest that plant sexual reproduction could be adversely affected by acidic precipitation at pH levels observed for rain events in eastern North America.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postpollination rain at pH 4.5 reduced seed set by 7% versus pH 5.5.

Treatment
pH 4.5e0
Outcome
percentage seed sete0
Direction
reducede0
Value
7e0
Comparator
pH 5.5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Simulated rain treatment at pH 4.5, 3.5, or 2.5 after pollination reduced the percentage seed set of treated ears 7, 29, and 34%, respectively, as compared with pH 5.5.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postpollination rain at pH 3.5 reduced seed set by 29% versus pH 5.5.

Treatment
3.5e0
Outcome
percentage seed sete0
Direction
reducede0
Value
29e0
Comparator
pH 5.5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Simulated rain treatment at pH 4.5, 3.5, or 2.5 after pollination reduced the percentage seed set of treated ears 7, 29, and 34%, respectively, as compared with pH 5.5.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postpollination rain at pH 2.5 reduced seed set by 34% versus pH 5.5.

Treatment
2.5e0
Outcome
percentage seed sete0
Direction
reducede0
Value
34e0
Comparator
pH 5.5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Simulated rain treatment at pH 4.5, 3.5, or 2.5 after pollination reduced the percentage seed set of treated ears 7, 29, and 34%, respectively, as compared with pH 5.5.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postpollination pH 5.5 rain reduced seed set by 24% versus no rain.

Treatment
Simulated rain at pH 5.5 after pollinatione0
Outcome
seed sete0
Direction
reducede0
Value
24%e0
Comparator
no‐rain controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Simulated rain at pH 5.5 after pollination reduced seed set 24% as compared with no‐rain controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rain pH before pollination did not affect seed set.

Treatment
pH of simulated rain applied before pollinatione0
Outcome
seed sete0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pH of simulated rain applied before pollination did not affect seed set”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1003 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prepollination pH 5.5 rain had no seed-set effect versus no rain.

Treatment
pH 5.5 rain applied before pollinatione0
Outcome
seed sete0
Direction
no effectse0
Comparator
no‐rain controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pH 5.5 rain applied before pollination had no effects on seed set compared to no‐rain controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pollen germination and silk penetration were complete when rain began one hour after pollination.

Outcome
pollen germination and pollen tube penetration of the silk were completede0
Qualifier
1 h after pollinatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pollen germination and pollen tube penetration of the silk were completed by the time the rain treatments began 1 h after pollination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1279 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that acid rain affected pollen tubes after silk entry.

Organ / stage
silkse0
Treatment
simulated acid raine0
Outcome
pollen tubese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“simulated acid rain influenced pollen tubes after they entered the silks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1370 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest acidic rain can adversely affect plant sexual reproduction at regional rain pH.

Treatment
acidic precipitatione0
Outcome
plant sexual reproductione0
Setting
eastern North Americae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant sexual reproduction could be adversely affected by acidic precipitation at pH levels observed for rain events in eastern North America.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1539 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑

pollination · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 11 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

ph · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 12 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

rainfall · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 34 positive, 36 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.