Paper · 2014 · Functional Plant Biology

Changes in timing of water uptake and phenology favours yield gain in terminal water stressed chickpea AtDREB1A transgenics

Krithika Anbazhagan; Pooja Bhatnagar-Mathur; Kiran K. Sharma; et al.

15
claims
32
verbatim quotes
12
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Terminal drought causes major yield loss in chickpea, so it is imperative to identify genotypes with best suited adaptive traits to secure yield in terminal drought-prone environments. Here, we evaluated chickpea (At) rd29A:: (At) DREB1A transgenic events (RD2, RD7, RD9 and RD10) and their untransformed C235 genotype for growth, water use and yield under terminal water-stress (WS) and well-watered (WW) conditions. The assessment was made across three lysimetric trials conducted in contained environments in the greenhouse (2009GH and 2010GH) and the field (2010F). Results from the greenhouse trials showed genotypic variation for harvest index (HI), yield, temporal pattern of flowering and seed filling, temporal pattern of water uptake across crop cycle, and transpiration efficiency (TE) under terminal WS conditions. The mechanisms underlying the yield gain in the WS transgenic events under 2009GH trial was related to conserving water for the reproductive stage in RD7, and setting seeds early in RD10. Water conservation also led to a lower percentage of flower and pod abortion in both RD7 and RD10. Similarly, in the 2010GH trial, reduced water extraction during vegetative stage in events RD2, RD7 and RD9 was critical for better seed filling in the pods produced from late flowers in RD2, and reduced percentage of flower and pod abortion in RD2 and RD9. However, in the 2010F trial, the increased seed yield and HI in RD9 compared with C235 came along only with small changes in water uptake and podding pattern, probably not causal. Events RD2 (2010GH), RD7 (2010GH) and RD10 (2009GH) with higher seed yield also had higher TE than C235. The results suggest that DREB1A, a transcription factor involved in the regulation of several genes of abiotic stress response cascade, influenced the pattern of water uptake and flowering across the crop cycle, leading to reduction in the percentage of flower and pod abortion in the glasshouse trials.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the 2009GH trial, yield gain in the transgenic events was related to conserving water for the reproductive stage in RD7

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
RD7e1
Outcome
yield gaine1
Qualifier
conserving water for the reproductive stagee1
Setting
2009GH triale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“major yield loss in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–52 · show in text ↑
e1

“The mechanisms underlying the yield gain in the WS transgenic events under 2009GH trial was related to conserving water for the reproductive stage in RD7, and setting seeds early in RD10”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–1013 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the 2009GH trial, yield gain in the transgenic events was related to setting seeds early in RD10

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
RD10e1
Outcome
yield gaine1
Qualifier
setting seeds earlye1
Setting
2009GH triale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“major yield loss in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–52 · show in text ↑
e1

“The mechanisms underlying the yield gain in the WS transgenic events under 2009GH trial was related to conserving water for the reproductive stage in RD7, and setting seeds early in RD10”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–1013 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water conservation led to a lower percentage of flower and pod abortion in RD7

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
RD7e2
Treatment
Water conservatione2
Outcome
percentage of flower and pod abortione2
Direction
lowere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“major yield loss in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–52 · show in text ↑
e2

“Water conservation also led to a lower percentage of flower and pod abortion in both RD7 and RD10”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1112 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water conservation led to a lower percentage of flower and pod abortion in RD10

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
RD10e2
Treatment
Water conservatione2
Outcome
percentage of flower and pod abortione2
Direction
lowere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“major yield loss in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–52 · show in text ↑
e2

“Water conservation also led to a lower percentage of flower and pod abortion in both RD7 and RD10”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1112 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the 2010GH trial, reduced water extraction during vegetative stage in RD2 was critical for better seed filling in pods from late flowers

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
RD2e3
Outcome
better seed filling in the pods produced from late flowerse3
Qualifier
reduced water extraction during vegetative stagee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“major yield loss in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–52 · show in text ↑
e3

“reduced water extraction during vegetative stage in events RD2, RD7 and RD9 was critical for better seed filling in the pods produced from late flowers in RD2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1304 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the 2010GH trial, RD2 had a reduced percentage of flower and pod abortion

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
RD2e4
Outcome
percentage of flower and pod abortione4
Direction
reducede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“major yield loss in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–52 · show in text ↑
e4

“reduced percentage of flower and pod abortion in RD2 and RD9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1370 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the 2010GH trial, RD9 had a reduced percentage of flower and pod abortion

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
RD9e4
Outcome
percentage of flower and pod abortione4
Direction
reducede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“major yield loss in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–52 · show in text ↑
e4

“reduced percentage of flower and pod abortion in RD2 and RD9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1370 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the 2010F field trial, RD9 increased seed yield and harvest index compared with C235, with small changes in water uptake and podding pattern that were probably not causal

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
RD9e1
Treatment
rd29A:: (At) DREB1A transgenic eventse2
Outcome
seed yield and HIe1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
probably not causale1
Comparator
C235e2
Setting
field (2010F)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“major yield loss in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–52 · show in text ↑
e2

“chickpea (At) rd29A:: (At) DREB1A transgenic events (RD2, RD7, RD9 and RD10) and their untransformed C235 genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–318 · show in text ↑
e1

“However, in the 2010F trial, the increased seed yield and HI in RD9 compared with C235 came along only with small changes in water uptake and podding pattern, probably not causal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1550 · show in text ↑
e3

“the field (2010F)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–568 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Events RD2 with higher seed yield had higher transpiration efficiency than C235 in the 2010GH trial

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
RD2e4
Outcome
TEe4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
C235e4
Setting
2010GHe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“major yield loss in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–52 · show in text ↑
e4

“Events RD2 (2010GH), RD7 (2010GH) and RD10 (2009GH) with higher seed yield also had higher TE than C235”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1655 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Events RD7 with higher seed yield had higher transpiration efficiency than C235 in the 2010GH trial

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
RD7e4
Outcome
TEe4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
C235e4
Setting
2010GHe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“major yield loss in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–52 · show in text ↑
e4

“Events RD2 (2010GH), RD7 (2010GH) and RD10 (2009GH) with higher seed yield also had higher TE than C235”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1655 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Event RD10 with higher seed yield had higher transpiration efficiency than C235 in the 2009GH trial

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
RD10e4
Outcome
TEe4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
C235e4
Setting
2009GHe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“major yield loss in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–52 · show in text ↑
e4

“Events RD2 (2010GH), RD7 (2010GH) and RD10 (2009GH) with higher seed yield also had higher TE than C235”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1655 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DREB1A influenced the pattern of water uptake and flowering, leading to reduced flower and pod abortion in the glasshouse trials

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Gene
DREB1Ae5
Outcome
percentage of flower and pod abortione5
Qualifier
influenced the pattern of water uptake and flowering across the crop cyclee5
Setting
glasshouse trialse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“major yield loss in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–52 · show in text ↑
e5

“The results suggest that DREB1A, a transcription factor involved in the regulation of several genes of abiotic stress response cascade, influenced the pattern of water uptake and flowering across the crop cycle, leading to reduction in the percentage of flower and pod abortion in the glasshouse trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1657–1959 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greenhouse trials showed genotypic variation for harvest index and yield under terminal water stress

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
genotypic variation for harvest index (HI), yielde6
Qualifier
terminal WS conditionse6
Setting
greenhouse trialse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“major yield loss in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–52 · show in text ↑
e6

“Results from the greenhouse trials showed genotypic variation for harvest index (HI), yield, temporal pattern of flowering and seed filling, temporal pattern of water uptake across crop cycle, and transpiration efficiency (TE) under terminal WS conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–825 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greenhouse trials showed genotypic variation in the temporal pattern of flowering and seed filling under terminal water stress

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
temporal pattern of flowering and seed fillinge6
Qualifier
terminal WS conditionse6
Setting
greenhouse trialse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“major yield loss in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–52 · show in text ↑
e6

“Results from the greenhouse trials showed genotypic variation for harvest index (HI), yield, temporal pattern of flowering and seed filling, temporal pattern of water uptake across crop cycle, and transpiration efficiency (TE) under terminal WS conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–825 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greenhouse trials showed genotypic variation in water uptake pattern and transpiration efficiency under terminal water stress

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
temporal pattern of water uptake across crop cycle, and transpiration efficiency (TE)e6
Qualifier
terminal WS conditionse6
Setting
greenhouse trialse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“major yield loss in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–52 · show in text ↑
e6

“Results from the greenhouse trials showed genotypic variation for harvest index (HI), yield, temporal pattern of flowering and seed filling, temporal pattern of water uptake across crop cycle, and transpiration efficiency (TE) under terminal WS conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–825 · show in text ↑

transgenic · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.