Abstract
Nitrogen and sulphur fertilization positively affected on crop yields and bioactive compounds (vitamin C, E1 and ß-carotene) content in cauliflower edible heads. Applying fertilization doses of 250 kg N.ha-1 and 60 kg S.ha-1 compared to the control improved cauliflower harvest by 15,2 t.ha-1. Increased fertilization doses of nitrogen and sulphur significantly increased vitamin C and ß-carotene content in the cauliflower. High significant difference in vitamin C level was found comparing the control variant and variant of nitrogen fertilization at the level of 200 kg N.ha-1. In percentage terms this is an increase in vitamin C level by 22,4%. Fertilization with increased doses of nitrogen and sulphur affected significantly the amount of ß-carotene compared to unfertilized variant. Increased doses of N and S did not respond adequately to vitamin E1 content in cauliflower.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen and sulphur fertilization improved cauliflower harvest by 15,2 t.ha-1 relative to control.
- Taxon
- cauliflower
Brassica oleracea var. botrytise0 - Treatment
- 250 kg N.ha-1 and 60 kg S.ha-1e0
- Outcome
- cauliflower harveste0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 15,2 t.ha-1e0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Applying fertilization doses of 250 kg N.ha-1 and 60 kg S.ha-1 compared to the control improved cauliflower harvest by 15,2 t.ha-1.”
Claim · model-written summary
Increased nitrogen and sulphur fertilization significantly increased cauliflower vitamin C content.
- Taxon
- cauliflowerBrassica oleracea var. botrytise0
- Treatment
- Increased fertilization doses of nitrogen and sulphure0
- Outcome
- vitamin Ce0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Increased fertilization doses of nitrogen and sulphur significantly increased vitamin C and ß-carotene content in the cauliflower.”
Claim · model-written summary
Increased nitrogen and sulphur fertilization significantly increased cauliflower ß-carotene content.
- Taxon
- cauliflowerBrassica oleracea var. botrytise0
- Treatment
- Increased fertilization doses of nitrogen and sulphure0
- Outcome
- ß-carotene contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Increased fertilization doses of nitrogen and sulphur significantly increased vitamin C and ß-carotene content in the cauliflower.”
Claim · model-written summary
At 200 kg N.ha-1 vitamin C level increased 22,4% relative to control.
- Taxon
- CAULIFLOWERBrassica oleracea var. botrytist0
- Treatment
- 200 kg N.ha-1e0
- Outcome
- vitamin C levele0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 22,4%e0
- Comparator
- the control variante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“High significant difference in vitamin C level was found comparing the control variant and variant of nitrogen fertilization at the level of 200 kg N.ha-1. In percentage terms this is an increase in vitamin C level by 22,4%.”
t0“CAULIFLOWER”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher nitrogen and sulphur fertilization significantly affected ß-carotene relative to unfertilized plants.
- Taxon
- CAULIFLOWERBrassica oleracea var. botrytist0
- Treatment
- increased doses of nitrogen and sulphure0
- Outcome
- amount of ß-carotenee0
- Comparator
- unfertilized variante0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fertilization with increased doses of nitrogen and sulphur affected significantly the amount of ß-carotene compared to unfertilized variant.”
t0“CAULIFLOWER”
Claim · model-written summary
Increased nitrogen and sulphur did not adequately change vitamin E1 content.
- Taxon
- cauliflowerBrassica oleracea var. botrytise0
- Treatment
- Increased doses of N and Se0
- Outcome
- vitamin E1 contente0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Increased doses of N and S did not respond adequately to vitamin E1 content in cauliflower.”
The same questions in other papers
sulfur atom · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →sulfur atom · molecular: metabolites · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ
56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
62 papers more in this group
See all 66 papers →nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →nitrogen · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
43 papers more in this group
See all 47 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.