Paper · 1979 · Annals of Applied Biology

Effects of short‐term waterlogging on the growth and yield of peas (Pisum sativum)

R. Q. CANNELL; K. GALES; R. W. SNAYDON; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
49
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY The effects of waterlogging the soil for up to 5 days on the growth of peas at different stages of development were investigated in glasshouse and outdoor experiments. During waterlogging the oxygen content of the soil declined to less than 2% within 2–3 days. Subsequently, leaf senescence was hastened, stem growth rate was slowed and yield was decreased. The effects on yield were mainly attributable to the development of fewer nodes and fewer pods. Waterlogging for 24 h or more just before flowering restricted growth and yield. The effects of waterlogging at earlier and later stages were less marked. Waterlogging at any period after flower buds were visible prevented further increase in root dry weight.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil oxygen fell below 2% within two to three days of waterlogging.

Outcome
oxygen content of the soile0
Direction
declinede0
Value
less than 2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During waterlogging the oxygen content of the soil declined to less than 2% within 2–3 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–267 · show in text ↑
t0

“peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging hastened leaf senescence.

Outcome
leaf senescencee0
Direction
hastenede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Subsequently, leaf senescence was hastened”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–311 · show in text ↑
t0

“peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging slowed stem growth rate.

Outcome
stem growth ratee0
Direction
slowede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stem growth rate was slowed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–340 · show in text ↑
t0

“peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging decreased yield.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield was decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–364 · show in text ↑
t0

“peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–66 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield effect was mainly attributable to fewer nodes.

Organ / stage
nodese0
Outcome
yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects on yield were mainly attributable to the development of fewer nodes and fewer pods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–460 · show in text ↑
t0

“peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–66 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield effect was mainly attributable to fewer pods.

Organ / stage
podse0
Outcome
yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects on yield were mainly attributable to the development of fewer nodes and fewer pods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–460 · show in text ↑
t0

“peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging for at least 24 hours before flowering restricted growth and yield.

Treatment
Waterlogging for 24 h or moree0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
restrictede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Waterlogging for 24 h or more just before flowering restricted growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–541 · show in text ↑
t0

“peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effects at earlier and later stages were less marked.

Outcome
effects of waterlogginge0
Direction
less markede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of waterlogging at earlier and later stages were less marked”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–615 · show in text ↑
t0

“peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging after visible flower buds prevented further root dry weight gain.

Treatment
Waterlogging at any period after flower buds were visiblee0
Outcome
root dry weighte0
Direction
prevented further increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Waterlogging at any period after flower buds were visible prevented further increase in root dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–720 · show in text ↑
t0

“peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–66 · show in text ↑

flooding · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

flooding · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

9 papers: 0 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.