Paper · 2002 · Plant Production Science

Relationship between Apical Dome Diameter at Panicle Initiation and the Size of Panicle Components in Rice Grown under Different Nitrogen Conditions during the Vegetative Stage

Kazuhiro Kobayasi; Yoji Horie; Tadashi Imaki

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
25
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

SummaryA pot experiment was conducted to analyze the relationship between the size of each apical dome (AD) and the numbers of differentiated primary rachis-branches (PBs) and spikelets. Two rice cultivars were used : one was a heavy-panicle type ‘Akenohoshi’ and the other was a many-tillering type ‘Nipponbare’. Rice plants were applied nitrogen (N) at various rates (75-600mg N pot–1 week–1) during the vegetative stage. The base diameter and the height of ADs were measured at the panicle initiation (PI) stage. At heading, the numbers of differentiated PBs, secondary rachis-branches (SBs), and spikelets were counted. The N treatment increased shoot N concentration in both cultivars. The N treatment increased the base diameter of AD in Akenohoshi at the PI stage, but not in Nipponbare. The ADs in Akenohoshi had a base diameter about 6.2% larger on average than that in Nipponbare. The N treatment did not affect AD height. In Akenohoshi, the plants with a larger AD base diameter differentiated more PBs per panicle and then differentiated more SBs and spikelets than did those plants with a smaller AD diameter. However, in Nipponbare, the N treatments did not affect the number of differentiated PBs per panicle. These results suggest that the AD size at the PI stage, which is enlarged by higher N nutrition in the vegetative stage, is a determinant of the number of differentiated PBs and spikelets and that a larger AD size is responsible for a higher number of PBs and spikelets in Akenohoshi.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen treatment increased shoot nitrogen concentration in both cultivars.

Treatment
N treatmente0
Outcome
shoot N concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N treatment increased shoot N concentration in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–689 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen increased apical dome base diameter in Akenohoshi.

Material
Akenohoshie0
Organ / stage
PI stagee0
Treatment
N treatmente0
Outcome
base diameter of ADe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N treatment increased the base diameter of AD in Akenohoshi at the PI stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen did not change apical dome base diameter in Nipponbare.

Material
Nipponbaree0
Treatment
N treatmente1
Outcome
base diameter of ADe1
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but not in Nipponbare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–793 · show in text ↑
e1

“The N treatment increased the base diameter of AD in Akenohoshi at the PI stage, but not in Nipponbare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–793 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Akenohoshi apical domes averaged about 6.2% wider than Nipponbare domes.

Material
Akenohoshie0
Outcome
base diametere0
Direction
largere0
Value
6.2%e0
Comparator
Nipponbaree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ADs in Akenohoshi had a base diameter about 6.2% larger on average than that in Nipponbare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–889 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen treatment did not affect apical dome height.

Treatment
N treatmente0
Outcome
AD heighte0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N treatment did not affect AD height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–931 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–106 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Within Akenohoshi, larger apical domes differentiated more primary rachis branches.

Material
Akenohoshie0
Outcome
PBs per paniclee0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
larger AD base diametere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In Akenohoshi, the plants with a larger AD base diameter differentiated more PBs per panicle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–106 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Within Akenohoshi, larger apical domes produced more secondary branches and spikelets.

Material
Akenohoshie0
Outcome
SBs and spikeletse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
those plants with a smaller AD diametere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In Akenohoshi, the plants with a larger AD base diameter differentiated more PBs per panicle and then differentiated more SBs and spikelets than did those plants with a smaller AD diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1121 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen treatment did not affect primary branch number in Nipponbare.

Material
Nipponbaree0
Treatment
N treatmentse0
Outcome
number of differentiated PBs per paniclee0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in Nipponbare, the N treatments did not affect the number of differentiated PBs per panicle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–106 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer apical dome size determines differentiated primary branches and spikelets.

Organ / stage
PI stagee0
Outcome
number of differentiated PBs and spikeletse0
Qualifier
AD sizee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the AD size at the PI stage, which is enlarged by higher N nutrition in the vegetative stage, is a determinant of the number of differentiated PBs and spikelets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1412 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–106 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

464 papers: 409 positive, 55 negative or no effect

408 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

460 papers more in this group

See all 464 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

401 papers in the same direction as this paper · 101 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,803 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.