Paper · 2005 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Influences of starch and Zn-EDTA on Zn-desorption and rice (Oryza sativaL.) nutrition under different moisture regimes

Tanmoy Karak; Uttam Kumar Singh; Jianbin Lai

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Desorption of Zn from sorbed Zn in soils is controlled by different moisture regimes in rice fields and thus control the Zn availability to rice. A laboratory experiment was conducted at different moisture regimes viz. flooded-dried, alternate wetting and drying and preflooding condition in two Inceptisols and two Alfisols of West Bengal, India, with (50 g kg − 1) and without starch as control to investigate the desorption of adsorbed Zn from Zn-EDTA (0.0, 0.1, and 0.2 mg Zn g − 1 soil). Percent desorption of Zn was found significantly higher on alternate wetting and drying condition in Alfisols. Starch applications enhanced desorption under flooded-dried and alternate wetting and drying, but decreased it under preflooding conditions. The variations in Zn desorption among soils and moisture treatments are the result of changes in soil pH, Fe-oxides, bonding energy constants, and free energies for Zn adsorption. After desorption experiment a pot trial was conducted with rice (cv. IET-4094) under alternate wetting and drying moisture conditions. The results show that the dry matter yield and 1000 grain weight of rice are appreciably higher when alternate flooding and drying moisture condition was maintained. This finding was in close agreement with the Zn desorption studies under the alternate flooding and drying moisture regimes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternate wetting and drying gave significantly higher zinc desorption in Alfisols.

Outcome
Percent desorption of Zne0
Direction
highere0
Setting
Alfisolse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Percent desorption of Zn was found significantly higher on alternate wetting and drying condition in Alfisols.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starch enhanced zinc desorption under flooded-dried conditions.

Treatment
Starch applicationse0
Outcome
desorptione0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
flooded-driede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Starch applications enhanced desorption under flooded-dried and alternate wetting and drying, but decreased it under preflooding conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–744 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starch enhanced zinc desorption under alternate wetting and drying.

Treatment
Starch applicationse0
Outcome
desorptione0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
alternate wetting and dryinge0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Starch applications enhanced desorption under flooded-dried and alternate wetting and drying, but decreased it under preflooding conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–744 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starch decreased zinc desorption under preflooding conditions.

Treatment
Starch applicationse0
Outcome
desorptione0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
preflooding conditionse0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Starch applications enhanced desorption under flooded-dried and alternate wetting and drying, but decreased it under preflooding conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–744 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice dry matter yield was higher under alternate flooding and drying.

Treatment
alternate flooding and drying moisture conditione0
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the dry matter yield and 1000 grain weight of rice are appreciably higher when alternate flooding and drying moisture condition was maintained.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1225 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice 1000 grain weight was higher under alternate flooding and drying.

Treatment
alternate flooding and drying moisture conditione0
Outcome
1000 grain weighte0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the dry matter yield and 1000 grain weight of rice are appreciably higher when alternate flooding and drying moisture condition was maintained.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1225 · show in text ↑

processing · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 88 positive, 26 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

110 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

flooding · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

286 papers: 193 positive, 93 negative or no effect

192 papers in the same direction as this paper · 82 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

282 papers more in this group

See all 286 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.