Paper · 2004 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Interactive Effects of Potassium and Calcium on K/Ca Ratio and Its Consequences on Apple Fruit Quality in Calcareous Soils of Iran

M. R. Dilmaghani; M. J. Malakouti; G. H. Neilsen; et al.

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
55
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract This research was carried out during the 2000–2001 growing season in a low-density orchard, on a calcareous soil (Fine loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Calcixerept) in northwest Iran, using 25-year old “Golden Delicious” (Malus domestica Borkh.) apple trees on M.9 rootstock. The interactive effects of potassium (K) and calcium (Ca) on K/Ca ratio and its consequences on apple fruit quality were studied. Treatments included: T 1 = control [nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and manure]; T 2 = T 1 + micronutrients (deep placement) based on soil test recommendations; T 3 = T 2 + (KCl)1 based on soil test recommendations; T 4 = T 3 + spray of CaCl2 at four times; T 5 = same as T 4 but sprayed at eight times; T 6 = T 2 + (KCl)2 (50% above soil test); T 7 = T 6 + spray of CaCl2 at four times; T 8 = same as T 7 but sprayed at eight times; T 9 = same as T 8 but with an equal amount of K from K2SO4 source. Leaf samples were collected in early July and fruit samples collected in early October and were analyzed for N, K, and Ca. Thirty fruit samples were randomly selected and stored at 1°C for 45 or 90 days prior to determination of their storage life. There was a range in K and Ca level in the leaves, although both K and Ca concentrations exceeded their critical threshold values. The concentration of K in the fruit was high, but Ca was low. There was a positive correlation between leaf K and fruit K and between fruit K and total soluble solids concentration (SSC); between fruit Ca and apple fruit firmness; but negative correlations existed between K/Ca ratio and apple fruit firmness at harvest. Apple fruit SSC was increased by K-fertilization and storage period. Fruit firmness in harvest samples was the highest in plots which had received Ca sprays. Apple firmness at harvest was generally low for all treatments and reduced by duration of storage and differences among treatments were not large after 90-day storage. Variation of K/Ca ratio in the apple leaves was slight (0.9–1.4), but a wide range was observed for fruit (19–46). The highest ratio (46) occurred for T 6 and the lowest ratio (19) for T 8 and T 9. An inverse relationship between K/Ca ratios and fruit firmness indicated that on calcareous soils, at least 8-foliar applications of CaCl2 solution were necessary for “Golden Delicious” apple.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf potassium and calcium concentrations exceeded critical thresholds.

Outcome
K and Ca concentrationse0
Direction
exceedede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“both K and Ca concentrations exceeded their critical threshold values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1285 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit potassium was high and calcium low.

Outcome
concentration of K in the fruite0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“The concentration of K in the fruit was high, but Ca was low.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1348 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf and fruit potassium were positively correlated.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
fruit Ke0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“positive correlation between leaf K and fruit K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1408 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit potassium and soluble solids were positively correlated.

Compound
Ke0
Outcome
total soluble solids concentration (SSC)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“between fruit K and total soluble solids concentration (SSC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1473 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit calcium and firmness were positively correlated.

Compound
Cae0
Outcome
apple fruit firmnesse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“between fruit Ca and apple fruit firmness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1475–1516 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit K/Ca ratio and firmness were negatively correlated at harvest.

Compound
K/Ca ratioe0
Outcome
apple fruit firmnesse0
Direction
negativee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“negative correlations existed between K/Ca ratio and apple fruit firmness at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1522–1606 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium fertilization increased fruit soluble solids.

Treatment
K-fertilizatione0
Outcome
Apple fruit SSCe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“Apple fruit SSC was increased by K-fertilization and storage period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1608–1675 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage increased fruit soluble solids.

Treatment
storage periode0
Outcome
Apple fruit SSCe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“Apple fruit SSC was increased by K-fertilization and storage period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1608–1675 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium-sprayed plots had the firmest fruit at harvest.

Treatment
Ca sprayse0
Outcome
Fruit firmnesse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit firmness in harvest samples was the highest in plots which had received Ca sprays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1677–1764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage duration reduced apple firmness.

Treatment
duration of storagee0
Outcome
Apple firmnesse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“Apple firmness at harvest was generally low for all treatments and reduced by duration of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1766–1863 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment differences in firmness were small after 90 days of storage.

Outcome
differences among treatmentse0
Qualifier
90-day storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“differences among treatments were not large after 90-day storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1868–1932 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf K/Ca ratio varied slightly from 0.9 to 1.4.

Organ / stage
apple leavese0
Outcome
Variation of K/Ca ratioe0
Value
0.9–1.4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“Variation of K/Ca ratio in the apple leaves was slight (0.9–1.4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1934–1998 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit K/Ca ratio ranged from 19 to 46.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Outcome
rangee0
Value
19–46e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“a wide range was observed for fruit (19–46)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2004–2047 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T 6 had the highest K/Ca ratio of 46.

Treatment
T 6e0
Outcome
ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
46e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest ratio (46) occurred for T 6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2049–2088 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments T 8 and T 9 had the lowest K/Ca ratio of 19.

Outcome
ratioe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
19e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“the lowest ratio (19) for T 8 and T 9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2093–2130 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended at least eight foliar CaCl2 applications on calcareous soils.

Outcome
at least 8-foliar applications of CaCl2 solutione0
Setting
calcareous soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“on calcareous soils, at least 8-foliar applications of CaCl2 solution were necessary for “Golden Delicious” apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2210–2323 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

38 papers: 33 positive, 5 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

potassium · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

application · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 58 positive, 16 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

118 papers: 93 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

114 papers more in this group

See all 118 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.