Paper · 2008 · Plant Production Science

Effect of Nitrogen Application Rate and Timing on Grain Yield and Protein Content of the Bread Wheat Cultivar ‘Minaminokaori’ in Southwestern Japan

Hiroshi Nakano; Satoshi Morita; Osamu Kusuda

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
38
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effect of nitrogen (N) application rates at active tillering and anthesis on grain yield and protein content of a bread wheat cultivar, ‘Minaminokaori’, was examined in the field study conducted in Fukuoka, Japan. Number of spikes, leaf area index (LAI), and SPAD value at anthesis increased significantly (P < 0.05) with increasing N application rate at active tillering. Grain yield also increased significantly (P < 0.05) because of the increased number of spikes. However, grain yield did not increase significantly (P > 0.05) with increasing N application rate at anthesis. The slope of the relationship between N application rate at active tillering and grain yield was about 3 times that of the relationship between N application rate at anthesis and grain yield. These results indicate that N application at active tillering is more effective than N application at anthesis for increasing grain yield. Increasing N application rate at active tillering and anthesis generally increased grain protein content. However, the slope of the relationship between N application rate at anthesis and grain protein content was about 2 times that of the relationship between N application rate at active tillering and grain protein content. These results indicate that N application at anthesis is more effective than N application at active tillering for increasing grain protein content. The interaction between N application rates at active tillering and anthesis was significant (P < 0.05) for grain protein content. With the application of 4 g N m–2 at active tillering, grain protein content increased linearly at a rate of about 0.5% per 1 g N m–2 (from 10.9% to 14.0%) with increasing N application rate (from 0 to 6 g N m–2) at anthesis. However, the rate of increase in grain protein content with increasing N application rate at anthesis was greater with 0 g N m–2 at active tillering than that with 4 g N m–2 at active tillering, whereas that with 8 g N m–2 at active tillering was smaller than that with 4 g N m–2 at active tillering. Application of 8 g N m–2 at tillering resulted in the highest SPAD value at anthesis; this was followed by the results for 4 and 0 g N m–2. Therefore, the SPAD value may be an important trait to decide N application rate at anthesis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N application at active tillering increased spike number, LAI and SPAD value at anthesis in bread wheat in a Fukuoka field study.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
Minaminokaorie0
Treatment
N application rate at active tilleringe1
Outcome
Number of spikes, leaf area index (LAI), and SPAD value at anthesise1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
P < 0.05e1
Setting
field study conducted in Fukuoka, Japane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of nitrogen (N) application rates at active tillering and anthesis on grain yield and protein content of a bread wheat cultivar, ‘Minaminokaori’, was examined in the field study conducted in Fukuoka, Japan.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
e1

“Number of spikes, leaf area index (LAI), and SPAD value at anthesis increased significantly (P < 0.05) with increasing N application rate at active tillering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–375 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield increased significantly in bread wheat, which the authors attribute to more spikes.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
Minaminokaorie0
Outcome
Grain yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
because of the increased number of spikese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of nitrogen (N) application rates at active tillering and anthesis on grain yield and protein content of a bread wheat cultivar, ‘Minaminokaori’, was examined in the field study conducted in Fukuoka, Japan.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
e2

“Grain yield also increased significantly (P < 0.05) because of the increased number of spikes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–470 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield did not increase significantly with increasing N application at anthesis in bread wheat.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
Minaminokaorie0
Treatment
increasing N application rate at anthesise3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
did not increasee3
Qualifier
P > 0.05e3
Setting
field study conducted in Fukuoka, Japane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of nitrogen (N) application rates at active tillering and anthesis on grain yield and protein content of a bread wheat cultivar, ‘Minaminokaori’, was examined in the field study conducted in Fukuoka, Japan.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
e3

“grain yield did not increase significantly (P > 0.05) with increasing N application rate at anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–581 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The slope of grain yield on N rate at active tillering was about 3 times that on N rate at anthesis.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
The slope of the relationship between N application rate at active tillering and grain yielde4
Value
about 3 timese4
Comparator
the relationship between N application rate at anthesis and grain yielde4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of nitrogen (N) application rates at active tillering and anthesis on grain yield and protein content of a bread wheat cultivar, ‘Minaminokaori’, was examined in the field study conducted in Fukuoka, Japan.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
e4

“The slope of the relationship between N application rate at active tillering and grain yield was about 3 times that of the relationship between N application rate at anthesis and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–773 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N application at both tillering and anthesis generally increased grain protein content in bread wheat.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
Minaminokaorie0
Treatment
Increasing N application rate at active tillering and anthesise5
Outcome
grain protein contente5
Direction
generally increasede5
Setting
field study conducted in Fukuoka, Japane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of nitrogen (N) application rates at active tillering and anthesis on grain yield and protein content of a bread wheat cultivar, ‘Minaminokaori’, was examined in the field study conducted in Fukuoka, Japan.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
e5

“Increasing N application rate at active tillering and anthesis generally increased grain protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1018 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The slope of grain protein content on N rate at anthesis was about 2 times that on N rate at active tillering.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
slope of the relationship between N application rate at anthesis and grain protein contente6
Value
about 2 timese6
Comparator
relationship between N application rate at active tillering and grain protein contente6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of nitrogen (N) application rates at active tillering and anthesis on grain yield and protein content of a bread wheat cultivar, ‘Minaminokaori’, was examined in the field study conducted in Fukuoka, Japan.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
e6

“the slope of the relationship between N application rate at anthesis and grain protein content was about 2 times that of the relationship between N application rate at active tillering and grain protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1239 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction between N rates at active tillering and anthesis was significant for grain protein content.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
interaction between N application rates at active tillering and anthesise7
Qualifier
for grain protein contente7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of nitrogen (N) application rates at active tillering and anthesis on grain yield and protein content of a bread wheat cultivar, ‘Minaminokaori’, was examined in the field study conducted in Fukuoka, Japan.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
e7

“The interaction between N application rates at active tillering and anthesis was significant (P < 0.05) for grain protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With 4 g N m–2 at active tillering, grain protein content increased linearly by about 0.5% per 1 g N m–2 of N at anthesis.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
increasing N application ratee1
Outcome
grain protein contente1
Direction
increased linearlye1
Value
about 0.5% per 1 g N m–2e1
Qualifier
With the application of 4 g N m–2 at active tilleringe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of nitrogen (N) application rates at active tillering and anthesis on grain yield and protein content of a bread wheat cultivar, ‘Minaminokaori’, was examined in the field study conducted in Fukuoka, Japan.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
e1

“With the application of 4 g N m–2 at active tillering, grain protein content increased linearly at a rate of about 0.5% per 1 g N m–2 (from 10.9% to 14.0%) with increasing N application rate (from 0 to 6 g N m–2) at anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1745 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With 4 g N m–2 at active tillering, grain protein content rose from 10.9% to 14.0% as N at anthesis increased from 0 to 6 g N m–2.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
increasing N application ratee1
Outcome
grain protein contente1
Direction
increasede1
Value
from 10.9% to 14.0%e1
Qualifier
from 0 to 6 g N m–2e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of nitrogen (N) application rates at active tillering and anthesis on grain yield and protein content of a bread wheat cultivar, ‘Minaminokaori’, was examined in the field study conducted in Fukuoka, Japan.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
e1

“With the application of 4 g N m–2 at active tillering, grain protein content increased linearly at a rate of about 0.5% per 1 g N m–2 (from 10.9% to 14.0%) with increasing N application rate (from 0 to 6 g N m–2) at anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1745 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rate of increase in grain protein content with N at anthesis was greater with 0 g N m–2 at tillering than with 4 g N m–2 at tillering.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
increasing N application rate at anthesise1
Outcome
rate of increase in grain protein contente1
Direction
greatere1
Qualifier
with 0 g N m–2 at active tilleringe1
Comparator
4 g N m–2 at active tilleringe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of nitrogen (N) application rates at active tillering and anthesis on grain yield and protein content of a bread wheat cultivar, ‘Minaminokaori’, was examined in the field study conducted in Fukuoka, Japan.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
e1

“the rate of increase in grain protein content with increasing N application rate at anthesis was greater with 0 g N m–2 at active tillering than that with 4 g N m–2 at active tillering, whereas that with 8 g N m–2 at active tillering was smaller than that with 4 g N m–2 at active tillering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1756–2046 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With 8 g N m–2 at tillering, the rate of increase in grain protein content with N at anthesis was smaller than with 4 g N m–2 at tillering.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
8 g N m–2 at active tilleringe1
Outcome
rate of increase in grain protein contente1
Direction
smallere1
Comparator
4 g N m–2 at active tilleringe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of nitrogen (N) application rates at active tillering and anthesis on grain yield and protein content of a bread wheat cultivar, ‘Minaminokaori’, was examined in the field study conducted in Fukuoka, Japan.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
e1

“the rate of increase in grain protein content with increasing N application rate at anthesis was greater with 0 g N m–2 at active tillering than that with 4 g N m–2 at active tillering, whereas that with 8 g N m–2 at active tillering was smaller than that with 4 g N m–2 at active tillering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1756–2046 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

8 g N m–2 at tillering gave the highest SPAD value at anthesis, followed by 4 and 0 g N m–2.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Application of 8 g N m–2 at tilleringe1
Outcome
SPAD value at anthesise1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
the results for 4 and 0 g N m–2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of nitrogen (N) application rates at active tillering and anthesis on grain yield and protein content of a bread wheat cultivar, ‘Minaminokaori’, was examined in the field study conducted in Fukuoka, Japan.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of 8 g N m–2 at tillering resulted in the highest SPAD value at anthesis; this was followed by the results for 4 and 0 g N m–2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2048–2186 · show in text ↑
Recommendationhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest SPAD value may be an important trait for deciding the N rate at anthesis in bread wheat.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
SPAD valuee1
Qualifier
to decide N application rate at anthesise1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of nitrogen (N) application rates at active tillering and anthesis on grain yield and protein content of a bread wheat cultivar, ‘Minaminokaori’, was examined in the field study conducted in Fukuoka, Japan.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–217 · show in text ↑
e1

“Therefore, the SPAD value may be an important trait to decide N application rate at anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2188–2280 · show in text ↑

tillage · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 55 positive, 17 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

tillage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 208 positive, 59 negative or no effect

207 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

263 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

454 papers: 400 positive, 54 negative or no effect

399 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

450 papers more in this group

See all 454 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

551 papers: 426 positive, 125 negative or no effect

425 papers in the same direction as this paper · 116 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

547 papers more in this group

See all 551 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

323 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,737 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.