Paper · 1987 · Agronomy Journal

Effects of Nitrogen and Potassium on Growth and Cation Composition of Corn Genotypes Differing in Average Ear Number1

S. A. Ebelhar; E. J. Kamprath; R. H. Moll

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Genetic improvements for increased grain yield through selection for prolificacy in corn ( Zea mays L.) may affect plant responses to fertilizers. A field study was conducted on a Dothan loamy sand (Typic Plinthic Paleudult) to determine the effects of N and K rates on growth, grain yield, and concentrations of N, K, Ca, and Mg in the leaves of corn genotypes differing in average ear production. Nitrogen rates of 50, 150, and 250 kg N ha −1 and K rates of 0, 50, and 100 kg K ha −1 were used in factorial combination with prolific (Pr), semi‐prolific (SP), and nonprolific (NP) genotypes at plant densities of 34 000 and 68 000 plants ha −1 . Leaf weight and grain yield of all three genotypes were increased with N fertilization. Response above 150 kg N ha −1 was relatively small. Yield response to K was obtained at 150 kg N ha~' but not at 250 kg N ha −1 in a year with optimum conditions for yield. Lack of K response at the high N rate was a result of greater uptake of soil K. Nitrogen rate had a greater effect on K uptake than K rate. Leaf concentrations of Ca, Mg, and K increased with N rates and were greatest with the Pr and SP genotypes. The Pr and SP genotypes had considerably higher leaf concentrations of Ca and Mg and total cation concentration than the NP genotype. However, the NP genotype had the highest leaf N concentration. Increasing K rates decreased Ca and Mg concentrations in the leaves but had little effect on total cation concentration.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilization increased leaf weight in all three corn genotypes.

Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
Leaf weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf weight and grain yield of all three genotypes were increased with N fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–743 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilization increased grain yield in all three corn genotypes.

Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf weight and grain yield of all three genotypes were increased with N fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–743 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Response above 150 kg N ha −1 was relatively small.

Outcome
Responsee0
Qualifier
above 150 kg N ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Response above 150 kg N ha −1 was relatively small.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–795 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield responded to K at 150 kg N ha~' in a year with optimum yield conditions.

Treatment
Ke0
Outcome
Yield responsee0
Qualifier
150 kg N ha~'e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield response to K was obtained at 150 kg N ha~' but not at 250 kg N ha −1 in a year with optimum conditions for yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–916 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield did not respond to K at 250 kg N ha −1.

Treatment
Ke0
Outcome
Yield responsee0
Direction
but note0
Qualifier
250 kg N ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield response to K was obtained at 150 kg N ha~' but not at 250 kg N ha −1 in a year with optimum conditions for yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–916 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed the lack of K response at high N to greater uptake of soil K.

Outcome
Lack of K responsee0
Qualifier
greater uptake of soil Ke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lack of K response at the high N rate was a result of greater uptake of soil K.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–996 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N rate affected K uptake more than K rate.

Treatment
Nitrogen ratee0
Outcome
K uptakee0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
K ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen rate had a greater effect on K uptake than K rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1056 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf Ca concentration increased with N rate.

Treatment
N ratese0
Outcome
Leaf concentrations of Cae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf concentrations of Ca, Mg, and K increased with N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1116 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf Mg concentration increased with N rate.

Treatment
N ratese0
Outcome
Leaf concentrations of Ca, Mg, and Ke0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf concentrations of Ca, Mg, and K increased with N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1116 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf K concentration increased with N rate.

Treatment
N ratese0
Outcome
Leaf concentrations of Ca, Mg, and Ke0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf concentrations of Ca, Mg, and K increased with N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1116 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pr and SP genotypes had higher leaf Ca and Mg and total cation concentration than NP.

Material
Pr and SP genotypese0
Outcome
leaf concentrations of Ca and Mg and total cation concentratione0
Direction
considerably highere0
Comparator
NP genotypee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Pr and SP genotypes had considerably higher leaf concentrations of Ca and Mg and total cation concentration than the NP genotype.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1298 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NP had the highest leaf N concentration.

Material
NP genotypee0
Outcome
leaf N concentratione0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the NP genotype had the highest leaf N concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1360 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing K rate decreased leaf Ca concentration.

Treatment
Increasing K ratese0
Outcome
Ca and Mg concentrations in the leavese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing K rates decreased Ca and Mg concentrations in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1429 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing K rate decreased leaf Mg concentration.

Treatment
Increasing K ratese0
Outcome
Ca and Mg concentrations in the leavese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing K rates decreased Ca and Mg concentrations in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1429 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing K rate had little effect on total cation concentration.

Treatment
Increasing K ratese0
Outcome
total cation concentratione0
Direction
little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing K rates decreased Ca and Mg concentrations in the leaves but had little effect on total cation concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1482 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑

potassium · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

96 papers: 74 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 74 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

92 papers more in this group

See all 96 papers →

potassium · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

potassium · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

320 papers: 291 positive, 29 negative or no effect

290 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

316 papers more in this group

See all 320 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

489 papers: 403 positive, 86 negative or no effect

402 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

485 papers more in this group

See all 489 papers →

fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,365 papers: 1,196 positive, 169 negative or no effect

1,195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 149 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,361 papers more in this group

See all 1,365 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.