Abstract
Twelve field trials were conducted over a three-year period (2010, 2011, 2012) at different locations in southwestern Ontario, Canada to compare various two-pass weed management strategies in glyphosate-resistant corn for crop injury, weed control, environmental impact, corn yield and profit margin. No visible injury resulted from the herbicide treatments evaluated. One early postemergence (EPOST) application of glyphosate provided good full season control of pigweed species and lady's thumb and fair control of velvetleaf, common ragweed, lamb's-quarters, barnyard grass and green foxtail. One late postemergence (LPOST) application of glyphosate provided excellent control of all weed species evaluated but corn yield was reduced due to early weed interference. The sequential application of glyphosate (EPOST fb LPOST) provided excellent control of all weed species evaluated with no adverse effect on corn yield. The sequential application of a preemergence residual herbicide followed by an application of glyphosate LPOST provided excellent full season control of all weed species evaluated and corn yield was equal to the weed free control. Among the sequential herbicide programs the lowest environmental impact was glyphosate EPOST fb LPOST and saflufenacil/dimethenamid-p, isoxaflutole + atrazine or rimsulfuron + s-metolachlor + dicamba applied PRE fb glyphosate LPOST. Based on this study, the most efficacious and profitable weed management programs in glyphosate-resistant corn are a sequential application of glyphosate or a two-pass program of a preemergence residual herbicide followed by glyphosate LPOST. The two-pass programs have glyphosate stewardship benefits.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
No visible crop injury resulted from the herbicide treatments in corn.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse1
- Treatment
- herbicide treatmentse2
- Outcome
- No visible injurye2
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“to compare various two-pass weed management strategies in glyphosate-resistant corn for crop injury”
e2“No visible injury resulted from the herbicide treatments evaluated”
Claim · model-written summary
One EPOST glyphosate application gave good full-season control of pigweed species and lady's thumb in corn.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse1
- Treatment
- One early postemergence (EPOST) application of glyphosatee3
- Interactor
- pigweed speciese3weed
- Second interactor
- lady's thumb
Persicaria maculosae3weed - Outcome
- full season control of pigweed species and lady's thumbe3
- Direction
- goode3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“to compare various two-pass weed management strategies in glyphosate-resistant corn for crop injury”
e3“One early postemergence (EPOST) application of glyphosate provided good full season control of pigweed species and lady's thumb and fair control of velvetleaf, common ragweed, lamb's-quarters, barnyard grass and green foxtail”
Claim · model-written summary
One EPOST glyphosate application gave fair control of velvetleaf and common ragweed, and lamb's-quarters, in corn.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse1
- Treatment
- One early postemergence (EPOST) application of glyphosatee3
- Interactor
- velvetleaf
Abutilon theophrastie3weed - Second interactor
- common ragweed
Ambrosia artemisiifoliae3weed
- Outcome
- fair control of velvetleaf, common ragweed, lamb's-quarterse3
- Direction
- faire3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“to compare various two-pass weed management strategies in glyphosate-resistant corn for crop injury”
e3“One early postemergence (EPOST) application of glyphosate provided good full season control of pigweed species and lady's thumb and fair control of velvetleaf, common ragweed, lamb's-quarters, barnyard grass and green foxtail”
Claim · model-written summary
One EPOST glyphosate application gave fair control of barnyard grass and green foxtail in corn.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse1
- Treatment
- One early postemergence (EPOST) application of glyphosatee3
- Interactor
- barnyard grass
Echinochloa crus-gallie3weed - Second interactor
- green foxtaile3weed
- Outcome
- barnyard grass and green foxtaile3
- Direction
- faire3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“to compare various two-pass weed management strategies in glyphosate-resistant corn for crop injury”
e3“One early postemergence (EPOST) application of glyphosate provided good full season control of pigweed species and lady's thumb and fair control of velvetleaf, common ragweed, lamb's-quarters, barnyard grass and green foxtail”
Claim · model-written summary
One LPOST glyphosate application gave excellent control of all weed species evaluated in corn.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse1
- Treatment
- One late postemergence (LPOST) application of glyphosatee4
- Outcome
- control of all weed species evaluatede4
- Direction
- excellente4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“to compare various two-pass weed management strategies in glyphosate-resistant corn for crop injury”
e4“One late postemergence (LPOST) application of glyphosate provided excellent control of all weed species evaluated but corn yield was reduced due to early weed interference”
Claim · model-written summary
One LPOST glyphosate application reduced corn yield due to early weed interference.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse1
- Treatment
- One late postemergence (LPOST) application of glyphosatee4
- Outcome
- corn yielde4
- Direction
- reducede4
- Qualifier
- due to early weed interferencee4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“to compare various two-pass weed management strategies in glyphosate-resistant corn for crop injury”
e4“One late postemergence (LPOST) application of glyphosate provided excellent control of all weed species evaluated but corn yield was reduced due to early weed interference”
Claim · model-written summary
Sequential EPOST fb LPOST glyphosate gave excellent control of all weed species evaluated in corn.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse1
- Treatment
- The sequential application of glyphosate (EPOST fb LPOST)e5
- Outcome
- control of all weed species evaluatede5
- Direction
- excellente5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“to compare various two-pass weed management strategies in glyphosate-resistant corn for crop injury”
e5“The sequential application of glyphosate (EPOST fb LPOST) provided excellent control of all weed species evaluated with no adverse effect on corn yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Sequential EPOST fb LPOST glyphosate had no adverse effect on corn yield.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse1
- Treatment
- The sequential application of glyphosate (EPOST fb LPOST)e5
- Outcome
- corn yielde5
- Direction
- no adverse effecte5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“to compare various two-pass weed management strategies in glyphosate-resistant corn for crop injury”
e5“The sequential application of glyphosate (EPOST fb LPOST) provided excellent control of all weed species evaluated with no adverse effect on corn yield”
Claim · model-written summary
PRE residual herbicide followed by LPOST glyphosate gave excellent full-season control of all weed species evaluated in corn.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse1
- Treatment
- a preemergence residual herbicide followed by an application of glyphosate LPOSTe6
- Outcome
- full season control of all weed species evaluatede6
- Direction
- excellente6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“to compare various two-pass weed management strategies in glyphosate-resistant corn for crop injury”
e6“The sequential application of a preemergence residual herbicide followed by an application of glyphosate LPOST provided excellent full season control of all weed species evaluated and corn yield was equal to the weed free control”
Claim · model-written summary
PRE residual herbicide followed by LPOST glyphosate gave corn yield equal to the weed-free control.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse1
- Treatment
- a preemergence residual herbicide followed by an application of glyphosate LPOSTe6
- Outcome
- corn yielde6
- Direction
- equale6
- Comparator
- weed free controle6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“to compare various two-pass weed management strategies in glyphosate-resistant corn for crop injury”
e6“The sequential application of a preemergence residual herbicide followed by an application of glyphosate LPOST provided excellent full season control of all weed species evaluated and corn yield was equal to the weed free control”
Claim · model-written summary
Sequential EPOST fb LPOST glyphosate had the lowest environmental impact among the sequential herbicide programs.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse1
- Treatment
- glyphosate EPOST fb LPOSTe7
- Outcome
- environmental impacte7
- Direction
- loweste7
- Comparator
- the sequential herbicide programse7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“to compare various two-pass weed management strategies in glyphosate-resistant corn for crop injury”
e7“Among the sequential herbicide programs the lowest environmental impact was glyphosate EPOST fb LPOST”
Claim · model-written summary
The most efficacious and profitable weed management programs in glyphosate-resistant corn are sequential glyphosate or PRE residual followed by LPOST glyphosate.
Verbatim
e1“to compare various two-pass weed management strategies in glyphosate-resistant corn for crop injury”
e2“the most efficacious and profitable weed management programs in glyphosate-resistant corn are a sequential application of glyphosate or a two-pass program of a preemergence residual herbicide followed by glyphosate LPOST”
Claim · model-written summary
The two-pass programs have glyphosate stewardship benefits in corn.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse1
- Outcome
- glyphosate stewardship benefitse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“to compare various two-pass weed management strategies in glyphosate-resistant corn for crop injury”
e2“The two-pass programs have glyphosate stewardship benefits”
The same questions in other papers
glyphosate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
73 papers more in this group
See all 77 papers →glyphosate · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
37 papers more in this group
See all 41 papers →glyphosate · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
37 papers more in this group
See all 41 papers →glyphosate · Echinochloa crus-galli · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
glyphosate · Abutilon theophrasti · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →herbicide · Echinochloa crus-galli · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →herbicide · Abutilon theophrasti · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →herbicide · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
57 papers more in this group
See all 61 papers →8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.