Paper · 1966 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Response of Corn to Zinc as Affected by Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilizers

G. L. Terman; S. E. Allen; B. N. Bradford

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Response of 2 successive crops of corn ( Zea mays L.) forage to fine zinc sulfate mixed with 2 soils was measured in greenhouse pot experiments. Zinc sulfate was also incorporated into −9 + 16‐mesh granules of each of four phosphates, ammonium nitrate (AN), and ammonium sulfate (AS) fertilizers. Large amounts of fine dicalcium phosphate (DCP), concentrated superphosphate (CSP), monoammonium phosphate (MAP), and ammonium polyphosphate (APP) depressed the pH of Hartsells fine sandy loam (limed to pH 7.1) increasingly in the order listed. Depression in soil pH was closely related to response of corn to 6 and 12 mg of applied Zn per pot (2 and 4 ppm of Zn). In Nolichucky sandy clay loam (pH 7.3) and Hartsells soil limed heavily to pH 8.0, soil pH remained high and response to Zn with the APP, MAP, and CSP sources of P was similar and greater than with DCP. Forage yields and uptake of Zn were in the order: Zn mixed alone with the soil > Zn in AN or AS granules > Zn in phosphate granules > no applied Zn. Results with Zn in DCP granules were poorest. Reciprocal Relationships between concentrations of P and Zn in the corn were largely related to yield levels dependent on sufficiency of Zn.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphate fertilizers lowered Hartsells soil pH in increasing order DCP, CSP, MAP, APP.

Treatment
dicalcium phosphate (DCP), concentrated superphosphate (CSP), monoammonium phosphate (MAP), and ammonium polyphosphate (APP)e0
Outcome
pH of Hartsells fine sandy loame0
Direction
depressede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Large amounts of fine dicalcium phosphate (DCP), concentrated superphosphate (CSP), monoammonium phosphate (MAP), and ammonium polyphosphate (APP) depressed the pH of Hartsells fine sandy loam (limed to pH 7.1) increasingly in the order listed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–550 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH depression was closely related to corn response to applied zinc.

Treatment
6 and 12 mg of applied Zn per pote0
Outcome
response of corne0
Qualifier
Depression in soil pHe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Depression in soil pH was closely related to response of corn to 6 and 12 mg of applied Zn per pot (2 and 4 ppm of Zn).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–670 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In high pH soils, corn response to zinc was greater with APP, MAP, and CSP than with DCP.

Treatment
APP, MAP, and CSP sources of Pe0
Outcome
response to Zne0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
DCPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil pH remained high and response to Zn with the APP, MAP, and CSP sources of P was similar and greater than with DCP.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–873 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn forage yields ranked soil mixed zinc above zinc in nitrogen granules, phosphate granules, and no zinc.

Treatment
Zn mixed alone with the soile0
Outcome
Forage yieldse0
Direction
>e0
Comparator
no applied Zne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Forage yields and uptake of Zn were in the order: Zn mixed alone with the soil > Zn in AN or AS granules > Zn in phosphate granules > no applied Zn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1022 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn zinc uptake followed the same fertilizer source ranking as forage yield.

Treatment
Zn mixed alone with the soile0
Outcome
uptake of Zne0
Direction
>e0
Comparator
no applied Zne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Forage yields and uptake of Zn were in the order: Zn mixed alone with the soil > Zn in AN or AS granules > Zn in phosphate granules > no applied Zn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1022 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Results with zinc in DCP granules were poorest.

Outcome
Results with Zn in DCP granulese0
Direction
pooreste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results with Zn in DCP granules were poorest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1068 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reciprocal phosphorus and zinc concentration relationships in corn largely tracked yield levels dependent on zinc sufficiency.

Compound
P and Zne0
Outcome
concentrations of P and Zne0
Qualifier
yield levels dependent on sufficiency of Zne0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reciprocal Relationships between concentrations of P and Zn in the corn were largely related to yield levels dependent on sufficiency of Zn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1209 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

235 papers: 199 positive, 36 negative or no effect

198 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

231 papers more in this group

See all 235 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

441 papers: 391 positive, 50 negative or no effect

390 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

ammonium polyphosphate · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

ammonium dihydrogen phosphate · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

244 papers: 190 positive, 54 negative or no effect

189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 50 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

240 papers more in this group

See all 244 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.