Paper · 2007

COVER CROPS AND COMPOST AMENDMENTS FOR ORGANIC GRAPE PRODUCTION

Ron Walser; Milagra Weiss; Steve Guldan; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Increased costs of fertilizers that rely on petroleum products coupled with increased pest control and transportation costs has prompted more management practices that can make use of local waste products and utilize cover crops to reduce purchased inputs. A burgeoning wine industry could benefit from organic production techniques; however, their effects on vine growth and grape quality have not been explored in New Mexico. Alternative vineyard floor management systems were evaluated for organic grape production at the Alcalde Sustainable Agriculture Science Center in Alcalde, NM, from 2003 to 2006. Grape yield and vegetative biomass were compared between plants grown with and without compost and cover crop. Soil and leaf tissue analyses were performed yearly to monitor changes in soil fertility and chemistry. Addition of compost to vineyard soils provided adequate mineral nutrition, with the exception of plant available potassium; though vegetative growth may have been excessive. A combination of cover cropping and compost addition supported adequate grape yield; however, soil and plant mineral nutrition were varied. The use of cover crops in vineyards must be carefully managed to avoid mineral nutrition competition and to obtain consistent effects.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost provided adequate mineral nutrition except plant available potassium.

Taxon
GRAPEt0
Treatment
Addition of composte0
Outcome
adequate mineral nutritione0
Qualifier
with the exception of plant available potassiume0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of compost to vineyard soils provided adequate mineral nutrition, with the exception of plant available potassium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–944 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost may have led to excessive vegetative growth.

Taxon
GRAPEt0
Treatment
Addition of composte1
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
excessivee0
Qualifier
may have beene0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“though vegetative growth may have been excessive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–994 · show in text ↑
e1

“Addition of compost to vineyard soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–859 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining cover crops and compost supported adequate grape yield.

Taxon
GRAPEt0
Treatment
A combination of cover cropping and compost additione0
Outcome
grape yielde0
Direction
adequatee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A combination of cover cropping and compost addition supported adequate grape yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil and plant mineral nutrition varied under combined cover cropping and compost.

Taxon
GRAPEt0
Treatment
A combination of cover cropping and compost additione0
Outcome
soil and plant mineral nutritione0
Direction
variede0

Verbatim

e0

“A combination of cover cropping and compost addition supported adequate grape yield; however, soil and plant mineral nutrition were varied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1134 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crops in vineyards require careful management to avoid mineral competition and obtain consistent effects.

Taxon
GRAPEt0
Outcome
carefully managed to avoid mineral nutrition competition and to obtain consistent effectse0

Verbatim

e0

“The use of cover crops in vineyards must be carefully managed to avoid mineral nutrition competition and to obtain consistent effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑

cover crop · yield · VitisResults differ

15 papers: 6 positive, 9 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

fertilization · yield · VitisResults differ

107 papers: 97 positive, 10 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · VitisPositive and negative results

47 papers: 43 positive, 4 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.