Paper · 1994 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Influence of nitrogen on growth and photosynthesis of a C3cereal,Oryza sativa, infected with the root hemiparasiteStriga hermonthica

I. Cechin; M.C. Press

13
claims
29
verbatim quotes
38
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Striga hermonthica is a root hemiparasitic angiosperm native to the African semi-arid tropics. It is a major weed of C4 cereals but locally it is also an important weed of the C3 plant, rice [Oryza sativa). Infected rice plants produced 17% and 42% of the total biomass of uninfected plants when grown at two different ammonium nitrate concentrations, 1 and 3 mol m−3, respectively. S. hermonthica prevented grain production at both concentrations of nitrogen. At the lower concentration no heads were produced. At the higher concentration head weight was only 6% of uninfected controls. S. hermonthica also altered the partitioning of dry matter between plant parts, such that shoot growth was reduced to a greater extent than root growth. As a consequence the root-to-shoot ratio of infected plants was approximately five times greater than that of uninfected control plants. Light saturated rates of photosynthesis In infected plants were 56% and 70% of those of uninfected controls, at low and high nitrogen, respectively. Infection also led to lower values of stomatal conductance although the substom-atal CO2 concentration was unaffected. Analysis of the response of photosynthesis to substomatal CO2 concentration (A/CI curves) demonstrated that lower rates of photosynthesis could not be solely attributed to lower stomatal conductances. Lower initial slopes and asymptotic rates suggest that both carboxylation and processes controlling regeneration of ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate are reduced by infection. The data are discussed with respect to the influence of S. hermonthica on the growth and photosynthesis of C4 hosts, where in contrast to the situation with rice, nitrogen feeding results in a marked alleviation of the effects of the parasite on the host.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infected rice biomass was 17% of uninfected plants at 1 mol m−3 ammonium nitrate.

Treatment
Infectede0
Interactor
Striga hermonthicaStriga hermonthicat0parasite
Outcome
total biomasse0
Direction
17%e0
Value
17%e0
Qualifier
1 and 3 mol m−3e0
Comparator
uninfected plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Striga hermonthica
Striga hermonthica · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryUSDA APHIS PPQ - Oxford, North Carolina , USDA APHIS PPQ, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Infected rice plants produced 17% and 42% of the total biomass of uninfected plants when grown at two different ammonium nitrate concentrations, 1 and 3 mol m−3, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–382 · show in text ↑
t0

“Striga hermonthica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infected rice biomass was 42% of uninfected plants at 3 mol m−3 ammonium nitrate.

Treatment
Infectede0
Interactor
Striga hermonthicaStriga hermonthicat0parasite
Outcome
total biomasse0
Direction
42%e0
Value
42%e0
Qualifier
1 and 3 mol m−3e0
Comparator
uninfected plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Striga hermonthica
Striga hermonthica · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryUSDA APHIS PPQ - Oxford, North Carolina , USDA APHIS PPQ, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Infected rice plants produced 17% and 42% of the total biomass of uninfected plants when grown at two different ammonium nitrate concentrations, 1 and 3 mol m−3, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–382 · show in text ↑
t0

“Striga hermonthica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Striga prevented grain production at both nitrogen concentrations.

Taxon
Oryza sativaOryza sativat0
Treatment
S. hermonthicae0
Interactor
S. hermonthicaStriga hermonthicae0parasite
Outcome
grain productione0
Direction
preventede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Striga hermonthica
Striga hermonthica · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryUSDA APHIS PPQ - Oxford, North Carolina , USDA APHIS PPQ, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S. hermonthica prevented grain production at both concentrations of nitrogen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–460 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oryza sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At lower nitrogen, infected rice produced no heads.

Taxon
Oryza sativaOryza sativat0
Outcome
no heads were producede0
Qualifier
lower concentratione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the lower concentration no heads were produced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–511 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oryza sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At higher nitrogen, infected head weight was 6% of uninfected controls.

Taxon
Oryza sativaOryza sativat0
Treatment
Infectede1
Outcome
head weighte0
Direction
onlye0
Value
6%e0
Qualifier
higher concentratione0
Comparator
uninfected controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the higher concentration head weight was only 6% of uninfected controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–587 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oryza sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“Infected rice plants produced 17% and 42% of the total biomass of uninfected plants when grown at two different ammonium nitrate concentrations, 1 and 3 mol m−3, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection reduced shoot growth more than root growth.

Taxon
Oryza sativaOryza sativat0
Treatment
Infectede1
Outcome
shoot growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
root growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot growth was reduced to a greater extent than root growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oryza sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“Infected rice plants produced 17% and 42% of the total biomass of uninfected plants when grown at two different ammonium nitrate concentrations, 1 and 3 mol m−3, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infected plants had about five times the root-to-shoot ratio of controls.

Taxon
Oryza sativaOryza sativat0
Treatment
infectede0
Outcome
root-to-shoot ratioe0
Direction
greatere0
Value
approximately five timese0
Comparator
uninfected control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root-to-shoot ratio of infected plants was approximately five times greater than that of uninfected control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–877 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oryza sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthesis in infected plants was 56% of controls at low nitrogen.

Taxon
Oryza sativaOryza sativat0
Treatment
infectede0
Outcome
Light saturated rates of photosynthesise0
Value
56%e0
Qualifier
low and high nitrogene0
Comparator
uninfected controlse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Light saturated rates of photosynthesis In infected plants were 56% and 70% of those of uninfected controls, at low and high nitrogen, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1026 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oryza sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthesis in infected plants was 70% of controls at high nitrogen.

Taxon
Oryza sativaOryza sativat0
Treatment
infectede0
Outcome
Light saturated rates of photosynthesise0
Value
70%e0
Qualifier
low and high nitrogene0
Comparator
uninfected controlse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Light saturated rates of photosynthesis In infected plants were 56% and 70% of those of uninfected controls, at low and high nitrogen, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1026 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oryza sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection lowered stomatal conductance.

Taxon
Oryza sativaOryza sativat0
Treatment
Infectione0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Infection also led to lower values of stomatal conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1085 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oryza sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection did not change substomatal CO2 concentration.

Taxon
Oryza sativaOryza sativat0
Treatment
Infectede1
Outcome
substom-atal CO2 concentratione0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“although the substom-atal CO2 concentration was unaffected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oryza sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“Infected rice plants produced 17% and 42% of the total biomass of uninfected plants when grown at two different ammonium nitrate concentrations, 1 and 3 mol m−3, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–382 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower photosynthesis could not be explained solely by lower stomatal conductance.

Taxon
Oryza sativaOryza sativat0
Outcome
lower rates of photosynthesise0
Qualifier
lower stomatal conductancese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower rates of photosynthesis could not be solely attributed to lower stomatal conductances.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1346 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oryza sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection appeared to reduce carboxylation and ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate regeneration.

Taxon
Oryza sativaOryza sativat0
Treatment
infectione0
Outcome
carboxylation and processes controlling regeneration of ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphatee0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower initial slopes and asymptotic rates suggest that both carboxylation and processes controlling regeneration of ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate are reduced by infection.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1515 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oryza sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑

infection · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

33 papers: 11 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

infection · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 6 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

infection · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 24 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

infection · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 9 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

infection · physiology: gas exchange · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.