Paper · 2010 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Simultaneously improving yield under drought stress and non-stress conditions: a case study of rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Y. S. Guan; R. Serraj; S. H. Liu; et al.

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
121
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Drought is the most important factor limiting rice productivity in the rainfed areas of Asia. In this study, 48 pyramiding lines (PLs) and their recurrent parent, IR64, were evaluated over two years for their yield performances and related traits under severe drought stress at the reproductive stage (RS), the vegetative stage (VS) and irrigated control in order to understand the relationship between drought tolerance (DT) and yield potential (YP) in rice and their underlying mechanisms. When compared with IR64, all PLs had significantly improved DT to RS and 36 PLs also had significantly improved DT to VS. In addition, 17 PLs had higher YP than IR64 and the remaining 31 PLs had a similar YP IR64 under irrigated conditions. Detailed characterization of the PLs revealed three possible mechanisms that functioned together to contribute to their improved DT. The most important mechanism was dehydration avoidance (DA), characterized by significantly higher growth rate and biomass of all PLs than IR64 under stress and no reduction in biomass under control conditions. The second mechanism was efficient partitioning, characterized by improved harvest index in all PLs compared with IR64, resulting primarily from heavier grain weight and/or higher spikelet fertility under control conditions, which was the major constituent of the improved YP in the 17 best performing PLs. Drought escape (DE) by accelerated heading under drought was the third mechanism that contributed to DT of the PLs to RS. The considerable variation in the measured traits among the PLs with similar levels of DT and YP implies the complex genetic control of the mechanisms for DT/YP and offers opportunities to improve DT and YP further by fine-tuning of a small number of QTLs segregating among the PLs using MAS. Finally, our results indicate that selection for yield plus some secondary traits under appropriate type(s) of stress and non-stress conditions similar to the target environments are critically important for improving both DT and YP in rice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All pyramiding lines had significantly improved drought tolerance to the reproductive stage compared with IR64

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Material
48 pyramiding lines (PLs)e0
Treatment
severe drought stress at the reproductive stage (RS)e0
Outcome
DT to RSe1
Direction
significantly improvede1
Comparator
IR64e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–117 · show in text ↑
e0

“48 pyramiding lines (PLs) and their recurrent parent, IR64, were evaluated over two years for their yield performances and related traits under severe drought stress at the reproductive stage (RS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–305 · show in text ↑
e1

“When compared with IR64, all PLs had significantly improved DT to RS and 36 PLs also had significantly improved DT to VS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–612 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thirty-six pyramiding lines had significantly improved drought tolerance to the vegetative stage compared with IR64

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Material
36 PLse1
Treatment
the vegetative stage (VS)e2
Outcome
DT to VSe1
Direction
significantly improvede1
Comparator
IR64e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–117 · show in text ↑
e1

“When compared with IR64, all PLs had significantly improved DT to RS and 36 PLs also had significantly improved DT to VS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–612 · show in text ↑
e2

“under severe drought stress at the reproductive stage (RS), the vegetative stage (VS) and irrigated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–354 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seventeen pyramiding lines had higher yield potential than IR64 under irrigated conditions

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Material
17 PLse3
Outcome
YPe3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
IR64e3
Setting
irrigated conditionse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–117 · show in text ↑
e3

“In addition, 17 PLs had higher YP than IR64 and the remaining 31 PLs had a similar YP IR64 under irrigated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–731 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The remaining 31 pyramiding lines had yield potential similar to IR64 under irrigated conditions

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Material
31 PLse3
Outcome
YPe3
Direction
similare3
Comparator
IR64e3
Setting
irrigated conditionse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–117 · show in text ↑
e3

“In addition, 17 PLs had higher YP than IR64 and the remaining 31 PLs had a similar YP IR64 under irrigated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–731 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under stress, all pyramiding lines had significantly higher growth rate and biomass than IR64

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Material
all PLse4
Treatment
under stresse4
Outcome
growth rate and biomasse4
Direction
significantly highere4
Comparator
IR64e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–117 · show in text ↑
e4

“The most important mechanism was dehydration avoidance (DA), characterized by significantly higher growth rate and biomass of all PLs than IR64 under stress and no reduction in biomass under control conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1075 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under control conditions, pyramiding lines showed no reduction in biomass

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Outcome
biomass under control conditionse4
Direction
no reductione4
Setting
control conditionse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–117 · show in text ↑
e4

“The most important mechanism was dehydration avoidance (DA), characterized by significantly higher growth rate and biomass of all PLs than IR64 under stress and no reduction in biomass under control conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1075 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All pyramiding lines had improved harvest index compared with IR64

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Material
all PLse5
Outcome
harvest indexe5
Direction
improvede5
Comparator
IR64e5
Setting
control conditionse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–117 · show in text ↑
e5

“The second mechanism was efficient partitioning, characterized by improved harvest index in all PLs compared with IR64, resulting primarily from heavier grain weight and/or higher spikelet fertility under control conditions, which was the major constituent of the improved YP in the 17 best performing PLs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1382 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improved harvest index was primarily due to heavier grain weight and/or higher spikelet fertility

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Outcome
harvest indexe5
Qualifier
heavier grain weight and/or higher spikelet fertilitye5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–117 · show in text ↑
e5

“The second mechanism was efficient partitioning, characterized by improved harvest index in all PLs compared with IR64, resulting primarily from heavier grain weight and/or higher spikelet fertility under control conditions, which was the major constituent of the improved YP in the 17 best performing PLs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, accelerated heading contributed to drought tolerance of the pyramiding lines to the reproductive stage

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
under droughte6
Outcome
headinge6
Direction
acceleratede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–117 · show in text ↑
e6

“Drought escape (DE) by accelerated heading under drought was the third mechanism that contributed to DT of the PLs to RS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1504 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Variation among pyramiding lines implies complex genetic control of drought tolerance and yield potential mechanisms

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Outcome
genetic control of the mechanisms for DT/YPe7
Qualifier
considerable variation in the measured traitse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–117 · show in text ↑
e7

“The considerable variation in the measured traits among the PLs with similar levels of DT and YP implies the complex genetic control of the mechanisms for DT/YP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1506–1666 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Selection for yield plus secondary traits under appropriate stress and non-stress conditions is critically important for improving drought tolerance and yield potential

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Outcome
selection for yield plus some secondary traitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–117 · show in text ↑
e0

“selection for yield plus some secondary traits under appropriate type(s) of stress and non-stress conditions similar to the target environments are critically important for improving both DT and YP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1834–2031 · show in text ↑

drought · phenology · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

18 papers: 2 positive, 16 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

drought · tolerance: abiotic · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.