Abstract
Field experiments during two successive rainy seasons were conducted in southern Vietnam to evaluate the effects of a commercial inoculant biofertilizer (‘BioGro’) and fused magnesium phosphate (FMP) fertilizer on yield and nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) nutrition of rice. Inoculation with BioGro containing a pseudomonad, two bacilli and a soil yeast significantly increased grain yield in the second season and straw yield in both seasons by 3–5%. The FMP fertilizer significantly increased grain yield from 1.72–2.33 t ha−1 to 2.99–3.58 t ha−1 along with total N and P accumulation at all rates in both cropping seasons. In the first season the difference in grain yield between BioGro treated and untreated plots was marginal but in the second season BioGro out-yielded the control at all the rates of added P. Overall, BioGro application did not compensate for low P fertilizer application to the same extent previously demonstrated for low N fertilizer applications.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
BioGro inoculation significantly increased rice grain yield in the second season.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae1
- Treatment
- Inoculation with BioGroe2
- Interactor
- pseudomonade2symbiont
- Outcome
- grain yielde2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Qualifier
- two bacilli and a soil yeaste2
- Setting
- second seasone2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Field experiments during two successive rainy seasons were conducted in southern Vietnam”
e1“on yield and nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) nutrition of rice”
e2“Inoculation with BioGro containing a pseudomonad, two bacilli and a soil yeast significantly increased grain yield in the second season and straw yield in both seasons by 3–5%”
Claim · model-written summary
BioGro inoculation significantly increased rice straw yield by 3-5% in both seasons.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae1
- Treatment
- Inoculation with BioGroe2
- Interactor
- pseudomonade2symbiont
- Outcome
- straw yielde2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 3–5%e2
- Setting
- both seasonse2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Field experiments during two successive rainy seasons were conducted in southern Vietnam”
e1“on yield and nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) nutrition of rice”
e2“Inoculation with BioGro containing a pseudomonad, two bacilli and a soil yeast significantly increased grain yield in the second season and straw yield in both seasons by 3–5%”
Claim · model-written summary
FMP fertilizer significantly increased rice grain yield to 2.99-3.58 t/ha from 1.72-2.33 t/ha.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae1
- Treatment
- FMP fertilizere3
- Outcome
- grain yielde3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Value
- 2.99–3.58 t ha−1e3
- Qualifier
- from 1.72–2.33 t ha−1e3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“on yield and nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) nutrition of rice”
e3“The FMP fertilizer significantly increased grain yield from 1.72–2.33 t ha−1 to 2.99–3.58 t ha−1 along with total N and P accumulation at all rates in both cropping seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
FMP fertilizer significantly increased total N and P accumulation in rice at all rates in both cropping seasons.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae1
- Treatment
- FMP fertilizere3
- Outcome
- total N and P accumulatione3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Qualifier
- at all rates in both cropping seasonse3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“on yield and nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) nutrition of rice”
e3“The FMP fertilizer significantly increased grain yield from 1.72–2.33 t ha−1 to 2.99–3.58 t ha−1 along with total N and P accumulation at all rates in both cropping seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
In the first season the difference in rice grain yield between BioGro-treated and untreated plots was marginal.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae1
- Treatment
- BioGroe4
- Outcome
- difference in grain yielde4
- Qualifier
- marginale4
- Comparator
- untreated plotse4
- Setting
- first seasone4
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“on yield and nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) nutrition of rice”
e4“In the first season the difference in grain yield between BioGro treated and untreated plots was marginal but in the second season BioGro out-yielded the control at all the rates of added P”
Claim · model-written summary
In the second season BioGro out-yielded the control in rice at all the rates of added P.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae1
- Treatment
- BioGroe4
- Outcome
- grain yielde4
- Direction
- out-yieldede4
- Qualifier
- at all the rates of added Pe4
- Comparator
- controle4
- Setting
- second seasone4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“on yield and nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) nutrition of rice”
e4“In the first season the difference in grain yield between BioGro treated and untreated plots was marginal but in the second season BioGro out-yielded the control at all the rates of added P”
Claim · model-written summary
BioGro application did not compensate for low P fertilizer application in rice to the same extent previously demonstrated for low N fertilizer.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae1
- Treatment
- BioGro applicatione5
- Outcome
- compensate for low P fertilizer applicatione5
- Direction
- did not compensatee5
- Qualifier
- to the same extent previously demonstrated for low N fertilizer applicationse5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“on yield and nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) nutrition of rice”
e5“Overall, BioGro application did not compensate for low P fertilizer application to the same extent previously demonstrated for low N fertilizer applications”
The same questions in other papers
magnesium atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ
38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
39 papers more in this group
See all 43 papers →magnesium atom · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →phosphorus · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
164 papers more in this group
See all 168 papers →inoculation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
381 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
414 papers more in this group
See all 418 papers →phosphorus · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
418 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
471 papers more in this group
See all 475 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
989 papers more in this group
See all 993 papers →fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
3,451 papers more in this group
See all 3,455 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.