Paper · 2004 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Mechanisms underlying the amelioration of O3-induced damage by elevated atmospheric concentrations of CO2

J. Cardoso-Vilhena

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
47
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

There is growing evidence that rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations will reduce or prevent reductions in the growth and productivity of C3 crops attributable to ozone (O3) pollution. In this study, the role of pollutant exclusion in mediating this response was investigated through growth chamber-based investigations on leaves 4 and 7 of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Hanno). In the core experiments, plants were raised at two atmospheric CO2 concentrations (ambient [350 micro l l(-1)] or elevated CO2 [700 micro l l(-1)] under two O3 regimes (charcoal/Purafil-filtered air [<5 nl l(-1) O3] or ozone-enriched air [75 nl l(-1) 7 h d(-1)]). A subsequent experiment used an additional O3 treatment where the goal was to achieve equivalent daily O3 uptake over the life-span of leaves 4 and 7 under ambient and CO2-enriched conditions, through daily adjustment of exposures based on measured shifts in stomatal conductance. Plant growth and net CO2 assimilation were stimulated by CO2-enrichment and reduced by exposure to O3. However, the impacts of O3 decreased with plant age (i.e. leaf 7 was more resistant to O3 injury than leaf 4); a finding consistent with ontogenic shifts in the tolerance of plant tissue and/or acclimation to O3-induced oxidative stress. In the combined treatment, elevated CO2 protected against the adverse effects of O3 and reduced cumulative O3 uptake (calculated from measurements of stomatal conductance) by c. 10% and 35% over the life-span of leaves 4 and 7, respectively. Analysis of the relationship between O3 uptake and the decline in the maximum in vivo rate of Rubisco carboxylation (Vcmax) revealed the protection afforded by CO2-enrichment to be due, to a large extent, to the exclusion of the pollutant from the leaf interior (as a consequence of the decline in stomatal conductance triggered by CO2-enrichment), but there was evidence (especially from flux-response relationships constructed for leaf 4) that CO2-enrichment resulted in additional effects that alleviated the impacts of ozone-induced oxidative stress on photosynthesis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 enrichment stimulated spring wheat growth and net CO2 assimilation.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
Hannoe1
Treatment
CO2-enrichmente0
Outcome
Plant growth and net CO2 assimilatione0
Direction
stimulatede0
Setting
growth chambere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant growth and net CO2 assimilation were stimulated by CO2-enrichment and reduced by exposure to O3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1031 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth chamber-based investigations on leaves 4 and 7 of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Hanno)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone reduced spring wheat growth and net CO2 assimilation.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
Hannoe1
Treatment
exposure to O3e0
Outcome
Plant growth and net CO2 assimilatione0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
growth chambere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant growth and net CO2 assimilation were stimulated by CO2-enrichment and reduced by exposure to O3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1031 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth chamber-based investigations on leaves 4 and 7 of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Hanno)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–382 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone impacts decreased with spring wheat age; leaf 7 was more resistant than leaf 4.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
Hannoe1
Organ / stage
leaf 7e0
Outcome
impacts of O3e0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
plant agee0
Comparator
leaf 4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the impacts of O3 decreased with plant age (i.e. leaf 7 was more resistant to O3 injury than leaf 4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1141 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Hanno)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–382 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpret age-dependent resistance as consistent with ontogenic tolerance shifts or acclimation to oxidative stress.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
more resistant to O3 injurye2
Qualifier
ontogenic shifts in the tolerance of plant tissue and/or acclimation to O3-induced oxidative stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a finding consistent with ontogenic shifts in the tolerance of plant tissue and/or acclimation to O3-induced oxidative stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1269 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Hanno)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–382 · show in text ↑
e2

“leaf 7 was more resistant to O3 injury than leaf 4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 protected spring wheat against adverse ozone effects in the combined treatment.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
elevated CO2e0
Outcome
adverse effects of O3e0
Direction
protectede0
Qualifier
combined treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the combined treatment, elevated CO2 protected against the adverse effects of O3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1353 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Hanno)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 reduced cumulative ozone uptake by about 10% over the lifespan of leaf 4.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Organ / stage
leaves 4e0
Treatment
elevated CO2e0
Outcome
cumulative O3 uptakee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
c. 10%e0
Qualifier
life-spane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the combined treatment, elevated CO2 protected against the adverse effects of O3 and reduced cumulative O3 uptake (calculated from measurements of stomatal conductance) by c. 10% and 35% over the life-span of leaves 4 and 7, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1511 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Hanno)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 reduced cumulative ozone uptake by 35% over the lifespan of leaf 7.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
elevated CO2e0
Outcome
cumulative O3 uptakee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
35%e0
Qualifier
leaves 4 and 7, respectivelye0

Not reportedOrgan / stageComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the combined treatment, elevated CO2 protected against the adverse effects of O3 and reduced cumulative O3 uptake (calculated from measurements of stomatal conductance) by c. 10% and 35% over the life-span of leaves 4 and 7, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1511 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Hanno)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–382 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 protection was largely attributed to pollutant exclusion through reduced stomatal conductance.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
CO2-enrichmente0
Outcome
protectione0
Qualifier
exclusion of the pollutant from the leaf interiore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the protection afforded by CO2-enrichment to be due, to a large extent, to the exclusion of the pollutant from the leaf interior (as a consequence of the decline in stomatal conductance triggered by CO2-enrichment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1645–1859 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Hanno)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–382 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Especially for leaf 4, evidence suggested additional CO2 effects alleviating ozone oxidative stress impacts on photosynthesis.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Organ / stage
leaf 4e0
Treatment
CO2-enrichmente0
Outcome
impacts of ozone-induced oxidative stress on photosynthesise0
Qualifier
additional effectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was evidence (especially from flux-response relationships constructed for leaf 4) that CO2-enrichment resulted in additional effects that alleviated the impacts of ozone-induced oxidative stress on photosynthesis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1865–2084 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Hanno)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–382 · show in text ↑

ozone · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

47 papers: 2 positive, 45 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

co2 · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

63 papers: 23 positive, 40 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 69 positive, 28 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.