Paper · 2014 · eSpace (Curtin University)

Pre-harvest ethephon application and training systems affect colour development, accumulation of flavonoids and fruit quality of 'Cripps pink' apple

Muhammad Shafiq; Zora Singh; Ahmad Sattar Khan

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Poor red blush development on the surface of apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) fruit at commercial harvest causes serious economic losses to apple growers. The effects of pre-harvest spray application of ethephon and different training systems (TS) on development of red blush, accumulation of flavonoids in the fruit skin and quality of ‘Cripps Pink’ apple were investigated for two consecutive years (2004-05). ‘Cripps Pink’ apple trees trained as vase (VS), spindle bush (SB), central leader (CL), and double row (DR) TS were sprayed with single dose of ethephon (480 g L-1) 18 days prior to anticipated commercial maturity (CM). Spray application of ethephon significantly improved percent red blush, concentrations of total anthocyanin and cyanidin 3-galactoside in the fruit skin, irrespective of TS in both years. Chroma value and hue angle of the fruit colour were also significantly improved with pre-harvest spray application of ethephon.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon improved red blush and two anthocyanin measures.

Organ / stage
fruit skine0
Treatment
ethephone0
Outcome
percent red blush, concentrations of total anthocyanin and cyanidin 3-galactosidee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spray application of ethephon significantly improved percent red blush, concentrations of total anthocyanin and cyanidin 3-galactoside in the fruit skin, irrespective of TS in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon improved fruit chroma and hue angle.

Treatment
pre-harvest spray application of ethephone0
Outcome
Chroma value and hue angle of the fruit coloure0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chroma value and hue angle of the fruit colour were also significantly improved with pre-harvest spray application of ethephon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–944 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–148 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

32 papers: 26 positive, 6 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 58 positive, 16 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.