Paper · 2006 · Annals of Agricultural Research

DIRECT AND RESIDUAL EFFECT OF HERBICIDES, PHOSPHATE SOLUBILIZERS USED IN WHEAT ON THE PRODUCTIVITY AND PROFITABILITY OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)—FODDER MAIZE (ZEA MAYS) SYSTEM

A.S. JAT; R. C. Dadheech; C.M. Parihar

15
claims
27
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Instructional Farm, Rajsthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur. The results indicated that pendimethalin being at par with other herbicides, produced the highest grain (47.2 q/ha) and biological (110.5 q/ha) yields closely followed by isoproturon. However, maximum net return (Rs 33073 /ha) and B:C ratio (3.60) were obtained from isoproturon. Phosphorus fertilization at 45 kg P2O5/ha significantly enhanced the yield as well as net return (Rs. 31467/ha) and B:C ratio (3.20) over 30 kg P2O5/ha. Seed inoculation with PSB had significant positive effect on wheat yields, net return (Rs. 31336/ha) and B: C ratio (3.18) as compared to no inoculation. Fodder yield and economics of maize was not influenced significantly due to herbicides applied in preceding wheat crop. Application of 60 kg P2O5/ha to preceding wheat crop had significant residual effect and produced higher green fodder yield (5.9%), net return (Rs. 19526/ha) and B: C ratio as compared to 30 kg P2O5/ha. Further, system productivity as wheat equivalent yield, net return and B: C ratio was also influenced significantly due to use of herbicides, phosphorus and PSB in wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin gave the highest wheat grain yield of 47.2 q/ha.

Treatment
pendimethaline0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
higheste0
Value
47.2 q/hae0
Comparator
other herbicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“pendimethalin being at par with other herbicides, produced the highest grain (47.2 q/ha) and biological (110.5 q/ha) yields closely followed by isoproturon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–280 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin gave the highest wheat biological yield of 110.5 q/ha.

Treatment
pendimethaline0
Outcome
biologicale0
Direction
higheste0
Value
110.5 q/hae0
Comparator
other herbicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“pendimethalin being at par with other herbicides, produced the highest grain (47.2 q/ha) and biological (110.5 q/ha) yields closely followed by isoproturon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–280 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon gave maximum wheat net return of Rs 33073 /ha.

Treatment
isoproturone0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
maximume0
Value
Rs 33073 /hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum net return (Rs 33073 /ha) and B:C ratio (3.60) were obtained from isoproturon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–376 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon gave maximum wheat B:C ratio of 3.60.

Treatment
isoproturone0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3.60e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum net return (Rs 33073 /ha) and B:C ratio (3.60) were obtained from isoproturon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–376 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus at 45 kg P2O5/ha significantly enhanced wheat yield over 30 kg P2O5/ha.

Treatment
45 kg P2O5/hae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
30 kg P2O5/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“Phosphorus fertilization at 45 kg P2O5/ha significantly enhanced the yield as well as net return (Rs. 31467/ha) and B:C ratio (3.20) over 30 kg P2O5/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus at 45 kg P2O5/ha significantly enhanced wheat net return to Rs. 31467/ha.

Treatment
45 kg P2O5/hae0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
Rs. 31467/hae0
Comparator
30 kg P2O5/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“Phosphorus fertilization at 45 kg P2O5/ha significantly enhanced the yield as well as net return (Rs. 31467/ha) and B:C ratio (3.20) over 30 kg P2O5/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus at 45 kg P2O5/ha significantly enhanced wheat B:C ratio to 3.20.

Treatment
45 kg P2O5/hae0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
3.20e0
Comparator
30 kg P2O5/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“Phosphorus fertilization at 45 kg P2O5/ha significantly enhanced the yield as well as net return (Rs. 31467/ha) and B:C ratio (3.20) over 30 kg P2O5/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PSB seed inoculation significantly improved wheat yields versus no inoculation.

Treatment
Seed inoculation with PSBe0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
wheat yieldse0
Direction
positivee0
Comparator
no inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seed inoculation with PSB had significant positive effect on wheat yields, net return (Rs. 31336/ha) and B: C ratio (3.18) as compared to no inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–684 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PSB seed inoculation significantly improved wheat net return to Rs. 31336/ha.

Treatment
Seed inoculation with PSBe0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
positivee0
Value
Rs. 31336/hae0
Comparator
no inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed inoculation with PSB had significant positive effect on wheat yields, net return (Rs. 31336/ha) and B: C ratio (3.18) as compared to no inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–684 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PSB seed inoculation significantly improved wheat B:C ratio to 3.18.

Treatment
Seed inoculation with PSBe0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
B: C ratioe0
Direction
positivee0
Value
3.18e0
Comparator
no inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed inoculation with PSB had significant positive effect on wheat yields, net return (Rs. 31336/ha) and B: C ratio (3.18) as compared to no inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–684 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides applied to preceding wheat did not significantly affect maize fodder yield or economics.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
herbicides applied in preceding wheat crope0
Outcome
Fodder yield and economicse0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fodder yield and economics of maize was not influenced significantly due to herbicides applied in preceding wheat crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 60 kg P2O5/ha to preceding wheat raised maize green fodder yield by 5.9% relative to 30 kg P2O5/ha.

Taxon
MAIZEZea mayst0
Treatment
60 kg P2O5/hae0
Outcome
green fodder yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.9%e0
Comparator
30 kg P2O5/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FODDER MAIZE (ZEA MAYS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–172 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of 60 kg P2O5/ha to preceding wheat crop had significant residual effect and produced higher green fodder yield (5.9%), net return (Rs. 19526/ha) and B: C ratio as compared to 30 kg P2O5/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–1006 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 60 kg P2O5/ha to preceding wheat raised maize net return to Rs. 19526/ha.

Taxon
MAIZEZea mayst0
Treatment
60 kg P2O5/hae0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs. 19526/hae0
Comparator
30 kg P2O5/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FODDER MAIZE (ZEA MAYS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–172 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of 60 kg P2O5/ha to preceding wheat crop had significant residual effect and produced higher green fodder yield (5.9%), net return (Rs. 19526/ha) and B: C ratio as compared to 30 kg P2O5/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–1006 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 60 kg P2O5/ha to preceding wheat raised maize B:C ratio.

Taxon
MAIZEZea mayst0
Treatment
60 kg P2O5/hae0
Outcome
B: C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
30 kg P2O5/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FODDER MAIZE (ZEA MAYS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–172 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of 60 kg P2O5/ha to preceding wheat crop had significant residual effect and produced higher green fodder yield (5.9%), net return (Rs. 19526/ha) and B: C ratio as compared to 30 kg P2O5/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–1006 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat herbicides, phosphorus and PSB significantly influenced system productivity, net return and B:C ratio.

Treatment
herbicides, phosphorus and PSBe0
Outcome
wheat equivalent yield, net return and B: C ratioe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)—FODDER MAIZE (ZEA MAYS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–172 · show in text ↑
e0

“system productivity as wheat equivalent yield, net return and B: C ratio was also influenced significantly due to use of herbicides, phosphorus and PSB in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1177 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

66 papers: 57 positive, 9 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

isoproturon · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

89 papers: 75 positive, 14 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

Triticum aestivum · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 83 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

627 papers: 549 positive, 78 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 69 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

623 papers more in this group

See all 627 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 500 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.