Paper · 2000 · Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science

Plant regeneration from leaf tissues of apple cultivars Granny Smith, Morspur Golden and Starkrimson

P. Gercheva; T. Andinova; Kristina Ivanova

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The influence of the nutrient media content (mileral salts, plant growth regulators, carbohydrates) and genotype on the regeneration from leaf segments of apple cultivars Granny Smith, Morspur Golden and Starkrimson was studied. Nutrien media based on MS macro and micro salts, 2,5mM IBA 7,5mM TDZ induced the best regenerative reply for all the cultivars. Optimal saccharose/sorbitol ratio for Morspur Golden (53% regeneration) and Granny Smith (87% regeneration) was found 29,2 mM and for Starkrimson (100% regeneration)-29,2mM/164,7mM. Differences in regenerative rate and callus formation percentage of the three cultivars were reported that probably were due to genome features.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MS salts with IBA and TDZ gave the best regenerative response across the cultivars.

Taxon
apple cultivarsMalus domesticat0
Treatment
MS macro and micro salts, 2,5mM IBA 7,5mM TDZe0
Outcome
regenerative replye0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nutrien media based on MS macro and micro salts, 2,5mM IBA 7,5mM TDZ induced the best regenerative reply for all the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–355 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Morspur Golden had 53% regeneration at the optimal saccharose/sorbitol ratio of 29,2 mM.

Material
Morspur Goldene0
Treatment
saccharose/sorbitol ratioe0
Outcome
regeneratione0
Direction
Optimale0
Value
53%e0
Qualifier
29,2 mMe0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Optimal saccharose/sorbitol ratio for Morspur Golden (53% regeneration) and Granny Smith (87% regeneration) was found 29,2 mM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–482 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Granny Smith had 87% regeneration at the optimal saccharose/sorbitol ratio of 29,2 mM.

Material
Granny Smithe0
Treatment
saccharose/sorbitol ratioe0
Outcome
regeneratione0
Direction
Optimale0
Value
87%e0
Qualifier
29,2 mMe0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Optimal saccharose/sorbitol ratio for Morspur Golden (53% regeneration) and Granny Smith (87% regeneration) was found 29,2 mM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–482 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starkrimson had 100% regeneration at the optimal ratio of 29,2mM/164,7mM.

Material
Starkrimsone0
Treatment
29,2mM/164,7mMe0
Outcome
regeneratione0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“for Starkrimson (100% regeneration)-29,2mM/164,7mM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–537 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regeneration and callus formation rates differed among the three apple cultivars.

Taxon
apple cultivarsMalus domesticat0
Outcome
regenerative rate and callus formation percentagee0
Direction
Differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences in regenerative rate and callus formation percentage of the three cultivars were reported”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–640 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑

glucitol · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

sucrose · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 12 positive, 4 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.