Paper · 2006 · European Journal of Horticultural Science

Sucrose and sorbitol effects on shoot growth and proliferation in vitro , nutritional status and peroxidase and catalase isoenzymes of M 9 and MM 106 apple ( Malus domestica Borkh.) rootstocks

T. E. Sotiropoulos; A. N. Molassiotis; G. I. Mouhtaridou; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Summary The in vitro response of the apple rootstocks M 9 and MM 106 to increasing concentrations of sucrose (44, 88 and 176 mM) and sorbitol (82, 164 and 329 mM) of the culture medium was evaluated. Sucrose at 88 mM in the MS medium was the optimal concentration for the proliferation of shoots of both rootstocks compared to 44 and 176 mM sucrose. By increasing the sucrose concentration of the medium, shoot length of MM 106 plants increased. However, the effect of the tested sucrose concentrations on the shoot length of M 9 plants was not apparent. The in vitro cultures of M 9 shoots produced the greatest number of shoots and the longest shoots per explant with 164 mM sorbitol in the medium compared to 82 and 329 mM sorbitol, and to all the sucrose concentrations tested. However, the in vitro cultures of MM 106 produced the highest fresh weight per explant, the greatest number of new shoots and the longest shoots per explant with 329 mM sorbitol in the medium compared to all other treatments, indicating a genotypic effect. Mineral concentration in plants was also a function of genotype, carbohydrate source and its concentration in the medium. Explants of both rootstocks treated with sorbitol showed the highest peroxidase and catalase activities in leaves and stems. Although no differences were found between the electrophoretic profiles of catalase, the presence of sucrose and sorbitol in the MS medium remarkably influenced the population of peroxidase isoenzymes in leaves and stems of both rootstocks.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

88 mM sucrose optimised shoot proliferation in both rootstocks versus 44 and 176 mM.

Organ / stage
shootse0
Treatment
Sucrose at 88 mMe0
Outcome
proliferation of shootse0
Direction
optimale0
Comparator
44 and 176 mM sucrosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sucrose at 88 mM in the MS medium was the optimal concentration for the proliferation of shoots of both rootstocks compared to 44 and 176 mM sucrose.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 200–349 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple ( Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–181 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing medium sucrose raised shoot length in MM 106.

Material
MM 106e0
Treatment
sucrose concentratione0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By increasing the sucrose concentration of the medium, shoot length of MM 106 plants increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–445 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple ( Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–181 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose concentrations had no apparent effect on M 9 shoot length.

Material
M 9e0
Treatment
tested sucrose concentrationse0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
not apparente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of the tested sucrose concentrations on the shoot length of M 9 plants was not apparent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–554 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple ( Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–181 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

164 mM sorbitol produced the most and longest shoots per M 9 explant versus other tested concentrations.

Material
M 9e0
Treatment
164 mM sorbitole0
Outcome
number of shoots and the longest shoots per explante0
Direction
greateste0
Comparator
82 and 329 mM sorbitol, and to all the sucrose concentrations testede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The in vitro cultures of M 9 shoots produced the greatest number of shoots and the longest shoots per explant with 164 mM sorbitol in the medium compared to 82 and 329 mM sorbitol, and to all the sucrose concentrations tested.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–781 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple ( Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–181 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

329 mM sorbitol maximised fresh weight, new shoot number and shoot length per MM 106 explant.

Material
MM 106e0
Treatment
329 mM sorbitole0
Outcome
fresh weight per explant, the greatest number of new shoots and the longest shoots per explante0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
all other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the in vitro cultures of MM 106 produced the highest fresh weight per explant, the greatest number of new shoots and the longest shoots per explant with 329 mM sorbitol in the medium compared to all other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple ( Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–181 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant mineral concentrations depended on genotype, carbohydrate source and concentration.

Material
genotypee0
Outcome
Mineral concentratione0
Qualifier
carbohydrate source and its concentratione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mineral concentration in plants was also a function of genotype, carbohydrate source and its concentration in the medium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1160 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple ( Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–181 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorbitol-treated explants had the highest leaf and stem peroxidase and catalase activities.

Organ / stage
leaves and stemse0
Treatment
sorbitole0
Outcome
peroxidase and catalase activitiese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Explants of both rootstocks treated with sorbitol showed the highest peroxidase and catalase activities in leaves and stems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1285 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple ( Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–181 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Catalase electrophoretic profiles did not differ.

Outcome
electrophoretic profiles of catalasee0
Direction
no differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no differences were found between the electrophoretic profiles of catalase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1369 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple ( Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–181 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose and sorbitol in MS medium altered leaf and stem peroxidase isoenzyme populations.

Organ / stage
leaves and stemse0
Treatment
sucrose and sorbitole0
Outcome
population of peroxidase isoenzymese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the presence of sucrose and sorbitol in the MS medium remarkably influenced the population of peroxidase isoenzymes in leaves and stems of both rootstocks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1526 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple ( Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–181 · show in text ↑

glucitol · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

sucrose · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 12 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.