Paper · 1992 · Agronomie

Rooting and weaning of apple rootstock YP

M. Uosukainen

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
18
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

— Rooting and weaning of the Finnish apple rootstock YP were studied. Rooting was affected by carbohy- drate type of the in vitro medium and age of the shoots. The highest rooting rate was achieved when either 30 g/l su- crose or glucose was used in the rooting medium and shoots were maintained for 5-7 wk on proliferation medium. Shoots > 7 wk rapidly lost their ability to root. In preliminary experiments VA-mycorrhizal inoculation had a positive ef- fect on growth during weaning and subsequent development in the greenhouse. in vitro rooting / Malus / carbohydrates / VAM inoculation Rsum — L'enracinement et le sevrage du porte-greffe de pommier finnois YP. L'enracinement et le sevrage du porte-greffe finnois YP ont t tudis. L'enracinement est influenc par le glucide du milieu et l'ge des tiges. Le meilleur taux d'enracinement a t obtenu avec du sucrose ou du glucose 30 g/l dans le milieu d'enracinement et quand les tiges ont t conserves pendant 5-7 semaines sur le milieu de prolifration. Les tiges plus vieilles que 7 se- maines perdent rapidement leur aptitude s'enraciner. Dans des essais prliminaires, l'inoculation par des mycorrhizes vasculaires arbusculaires a eu un effet positif sur la croissance pendant le sevrage et sur le dveloppement ultrieur en serre.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose at 30 g/l gave the highest rooting rate.

Material
YPt0
Treatment
30 g/l su- crosee0
Outcome
rooting ratee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest rooting rate was achieved when either 30 g/l su- crose or glucose was used in the rooting medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 160–268 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple rootstock YP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glucose in rooting medium gave the highest rooting rate.

Material
YPt0
Treatment
glucosee0
Outcome
rooting ratee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest rooting rate was achieved when either 30 g/l su- crose or glucose was used in the rooting medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 160–268 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple rootstock YP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoots maintained 5-7 weeks on proliferation medium had the highest rooting rate.

Material
YPt0
Treatment
5-7 wk on proliferation mediume0
Outcome
rooting ratee1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoots were maintained for 5-7 wk on proliferation medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–330 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest rooting rate was achieved when either 30 g/l su- crose or glucose was used in the rooting medium and shoots were maintained for 5-7 wk on proliferation medium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 160–331 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple rootstock YP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoots older than 7 weeks rapidly lost rooting ability.

Material
YPt0
Organ / stage
Shootse0
Outcome
ability to roote0
Direction
loste0
Qualifier
> 7 wke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoots > 7 wk rapidly lost their ability to root.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–381 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple rootstock YP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VA-mycorrhizal inoculation improved growth during weaning and later greenhouse development in preliminary experiments.

Material
YPt0
Treatment
VA-mycorrhizal inoculatione0
Interactor
VA-mycorrhizale0symbiont
Outcome
growth during weaning and subsequent developmente0
Direction
positive ef- fecte0
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In preliminary experiments VA-mycorrhizal inoculation had a positive ef- fect on growth during weaning and subsequent development in the greenhouse.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–530 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple rootstock YP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–41 · show in text ↑

glucose · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

sucrose · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 12 positive, 4 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

in vitro · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 34 positive, 4 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

inoculation · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 31 positive, 11 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.