Paper · 2022 · PLoS ONE

Glucose addition promotes C fixation and bacteria diversity in C-poor soils, improves root morphology, and enhances key N metabolism in apple roots

Bianbin Qi; Kuo Zhang; Sijun Qin; et al.

15
claims
32
verbatim quotes
17
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The interaction between plant, soil and microorganism plays a crucial role in sustainable development of terrestrial ecosystem function and diversity. However, little information is known about how plant growth, soil organic carbon (C) fractions and microorganism respond to exogenous C addition in soils with low organic C content. Three levels of 13C-glucose (equal to 0, 100% and 500% of initial microbial biomass C) were added to non-sterilized (corresponding to treatment abbreviation of CK, Glu-1, Glu-2, respectively) and sterilized soils (corresponding to treatment abbreviation of SS, SS+Glu-1, SS+Glu-2, respectively) planted with apple rootstock (Malus baccata (L.) Borkh.) seedings. The objectives of this study were to analyse the dynamics of soil organic C (SOC) fractions and soil bacterial community diversity with glucose levels and soil sterilization, and to explore the morphology of roots and nitrogen (N) metabolism by plant after glucose addition to sterilized/non-sterilized soils. Results showed that the contents of labile organic C fractions were significantly varied (P<0.05) with the levels of glucose addition and soil sterilization. SS+Glu-2 and Glu-2 treatments increased the contents of labile organic C fractions, on average, by 48.47% and 35.33% compared with no glucose addition, respectively. About 21.42% and 16.17% of glucose-C remained in sterilized and non-sterilized soils, respectively at the end of experiment (day 45). Regardless of soil sterilized or not, the glucose addition increased the richness and diversity indices of soil bacterial community compared with no-glucose addition. The glucose addition optimized root zone conditions, and enhanced root vitality, morphology and biomass. Both SS+Glu-2 and Glu-2 treatments significantly enhanced (P<0.05) the contents of nitrate (NO3-N) and nitrite (NO2-N), but sharply decreased (P<0.05) the ammonium (NH4+-N) content compared with no glucose addition. Also, these two treatments significantly (P<0.05) increased the enzymic activities and gene transcript levels involved in root N metabolism, which demonstrated that the high level of glucose addition promoted N assimilation and transformation into free amino acids by root. Overall, the addition of exogenous C to not only promotes its fixation and bacterial community diversity in C-poor soils, but also improves root morphology and N absorption by plant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Labile organic carbon fractions varied significantly with glucose addition and sterilization.

Treatment
glucose addition and soil sterilizatione0
Outcome
labile organic C fractionse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“contents of labile organic C fractions were significantly varied (P<0.05) with the levels of glucose addition and soil sterilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1161 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SS+Glu-2 increased labile organic carbon fractions by 48.47% over no glucose.

Treatment
SS+Glu-2e0
Outcome
labile organic C fractionse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
48.47%e0
Comparator
no glucose additione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SS+Glu-2 and Glu-2 treatments increased the contents of labile organic C fractions, on average, by 48.47% and 35.33% compared with no glucose addition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1313 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glu-2 increased labile organic carbon fractions by 35.33% over no glucose.

Treatment
Glu-2e0
Outcome
labile organic C fractionse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
35.33%e0
Comparator
no glucose additione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SS+Glu-2 and Glu-2 treatments increased the contents of labile organic C fractions, on average, by 48.47% and 35.33% compared with no glucose addition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1313 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–147 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At day 45, 21.42% of glucose carbon remained in sterilized soil.

Outcome
glucose-C remained in sterilizede0
Value
21.42%e0
Qualifier
day 45e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“About 21.42% and 16.17% of glucose-C remained in sterilized and non-sterilized soils, respectively at the end of experiment (day 45)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1461 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–147 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At day 45, 16.17% of glucose carbon remained in non-sterilized soil.

Outcome
glucose-C remained in sterilized and non-sterilized soilse0
Value
16.17%e0
Qualifier
day 45e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“About 21.42% and 16.17% of glucose-C remained in sterilized and non-sterilized soils, respectively at the end of experiment (day 45)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1461 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glucose addition increased bacterial richness and diversity regardless of sterilization.

Treatment
glucose additione0
Outcome
richness and diversity indices of soil bacterial communitye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
no-glucose additione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regardless of soil sterilized or not, the glucose addition increased the richness and diversity indices of soil bacterial community compared with no-glucose addition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1628 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glucose addition improved root zone conditions.

Treatment
glucose additione0
Outcome
root zone conditionse0
Direction
optimizede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“glucose addition optimized root zone conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1634–1681 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glucose addition enhanced root vitality, morphology and biomass.

Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
glucose additione0
Outcome
root vitality, morphology and biomasse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“glucose addition optimized root zone conditions, and enhanced root vitality, morphology and biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1634–1733 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SS+Glu-2 increased root nitrate and nitrite content significantly.

Treatment
SS+Glu-2e0
Outcome
contents of nitrate (NO3-N) and nitrite (NO2-N)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both SS+Glu-2 and Glu-2 treatments significantly enhanced (P<0.05) the contents of nitrate (NO3-N) and nitrite (NO2-N)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1735–1853 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glu-2 increased root nitrate and nitrite content significantly.

Treatment
Glu-2e0
Outcome
contents of nitrate (NO3-N) and nitrite (NO2-N)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both SS+Glu-2 and Glu-2 treatments significantly enhanced (P<0.05) the contents of nitrate (NO3-N) and nitrite (NO2-N)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1735–1853 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SS+Glu-2 sharply decreased root ammonium content.

Treatment
SS+Glu-2e0
Outcome
ammonium (NH4+-N) contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
no glucose additione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SS+Glu-2 and Glu-2 treatments significantly enhanced (P<0.05) the contents of nitrate (NO3-N) and nitrite (NO2-N), but sharply decreased (P<0.05) the ammonium (NH4+-N) content compared with no glucose addition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1740–1949 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glu-2 sharply decreased root ammonium content.

Treatment
Glu-2e0
Outcome
ammonium (NH4+-N) contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
no glucose additione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SS+Glu-2 and Glu-2 treatments significantly enhanced (P<0.05) the contents of nitrate (NO3-N) and nitrite (NO2-N), but sharply decreased (P<0.05) the ammonium (NH4+-N) content compared with no glucose addition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1740–1949 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SS+Glu-2 increased root nitrogen metabolism enzyme activities and transcript levels.

Treatment
SS+Glu-2e1
Outcome
enzymic activities and gene transcript levels involved in root N metabolisme0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these two treatments significantly (P<0.05) increased the enzymic activities and gene transcript levels involved in root N metabolism”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1957–2090 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both SS+Glu-2 and Glu-2 treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1735–1769 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glu-2 increased root nitrogen metabolism enzyme activities and transcript levels.

Treatment
Glu-2e1
Outcome
enzymic activities and gene transcript levels involved in root N metabolisme0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these two treatments significantly (P<0.05) increased the enzymic activities and gene transcript levels involved in root N metabolism”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1957–2090 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both SS+Glu-2 and Glu-2 treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1735–1769 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–147 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High glucose addition promoted root nitrogen assimilation and transformation into free amino acids.

Treatment
high level of glucose additione0
Outcome
N assimilation and transformation into free amino acids by roote0
Direction
promotede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high level of glucose addition promoted N assimilation and transformation into free amino acids by root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2120–2223 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–147 · show in text ↑

glucose · soil: biology · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

glucose · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.