Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sucrose concentrations had no apparent effect on M 9 shoot length.

A claim from Sucrose and sorbitol effects on shoot growth and proliferation in vitro , nutritional status and peroxidase and catalase isoenzymes of M 9 and MM 106 apple ( Malus domestica Borkh.) rootstocks · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose concentrations had no apparent effect on M 9 shoot length.

Material
M 9e0
Treatment
tested sucrose concentrationse0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
not apparente0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of the tested sucrose concentrations on the shoot length of M 9 plants was not apparent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–554
t0

“apple ( Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–181

Title

Sucrose and sorbitol effects on shoot growth and proliferation in vitro , nutritional status and peroxidase and catalase isoenzymes of M 9 and MM 106 apple ( Malus domestica Borkh.) rootstocks

T. E. Sotiropoulos; A. N. Molassiotis; G. I. Mouhtaridou; et al. European Journal of Horticultural Science 2006. doi:10.1079/ejhs.2006/338654

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-00ab720b79184ecbed692bd6095d6e35f701c67ae93e3bcc91d4e269b973e892 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

sucrose · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 12 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.