Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at Hisar during rabi season of 2007-08 to study the effect of different agro- nomic management practices on growth, yield and quality of late sown wheat( Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.). Dry seeding with overnight soaked seed on 15 December with 25% higher seed rate followed by irrigation produced higher grain and biological yield followed by dry seeding with 25% higher seed rate on 15 December fol- lowed by irrigation. Crop germination was earlier by 2 days when sowing with soaked seeds was adopted.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Soaked-seed sowing with a 25% higher seed rate on 15 December followed by irrigation gave higher grain yield than dry seeding with the higher seed rate.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- overnight soaked seed on 15 December with 25% higher seed rate followed by irrigatione0
- Outcome
- graine0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- dry seeding with 25% higher seed rate on 15 December fol- lowed by irrigatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat”
e0“Dry seeding with overnight soaked seed on 15 December with 25% higher seed rate followed by irrigation produced higher grain and biological yield followed by dry seeding with 25% higher seed rate on 15 December fol- lowed by irrigation”
Claim · model-written summary
Soaked-seed sowing with a 25% higher seed rate gave higher biological yield than the dry-seeded comparator.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- overnight soaked seed on 15 December with 25% higher seed rate followed by irrigatione0
- Outcome
- biological yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- dry seeding with 25% higher seed rate on 15 December fol- lowed by irrigatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat”
e0“Dry seeding with overnight soaked seed on 15 December with 25% higher seed rate followed by irrigation produced higher grain and biological yield followed by dry seeding with 25% higher seed rate on 15 December fol- lowed by irrigation”
Claim · model-written summary
Sowing soaked seeds advanced wheat germination by 2 days.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- sowing with soaked seedse0
- Outcome
- Crop germinatione0
- Direction
- earliere0
- Value
- 2 dayse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat”
e0“Crop germination was earlier by 2 days when sowing with soaked seeds was adopted”
The same questions in other papers
application · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
272 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
303 papers more in this group
See all 307 papers →density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
494 papers more in this group
See all 498 papers →application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
873 papers more in this group
See all 877 papers →irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
985 papers more in this group
See all 989 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.