Paper · 1994 · Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science

Effect of Methods of Urea Application on Yield of Wheat, and Nitrogen Fertilizer and Water Use Efficiency

A. S. Sidhu; H.S. Sur; Gaurav Aggarwal

4
claims
13
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted for two years (1986–87 and 1987–88) to evaluate methods of urea application to wheat at five levels of N and two levels of irrigation. The experiment consisted of two methods of urea application i.e. application of urea with pre-sowing irrigation (PSI) and with last preparatory tillage (PT), six levels of nitrogen (0, 30, 60, 90, 120 and 150 kg N ha−1) and two irrigation levels. Results indicate that PSI method gave higher grain yield than PT method at all the levels of nitrogen and irrigation. The PSI method caused 7 to 34 per cent increase in N fertilizer use efficiency over PT method. It also increased water use efficiency (2 to 24 per cent) over PT method. The economic response dose with PSI method was lower than PT method under both irrigation regimes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PSI urea application gave higher wheat grain yield than PT at all nitrogen and irrigation levels.

Treatment
PSI methode1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
at all the levels of nitrogen and irrigatione1
Comparator
PT methode1
Setting
Field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Methods of Urea Application on Yield of Wheat, and Nitrogen Fertilizer and Water Use Efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“Field experiment was conducted for two years (1986–87 and 1987–88)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results indicate that PSI method gave higher grain yield than PT method at all the levels of nitrogen and irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PSI urea application increased N fertilizer use efficiency by 7 to 34 per cent over PT.

Treatment
PSI methode2
Outcome
N fertilizer use efficiencye2
Direction
increasee2
Value
7 to 34 per cente2
Comparator
PT methode2
Setting
Field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Methods of Urea Application on Yield of Wheat, and Nitrogen Fertilizer and Water Use Efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“Field experiment was conducted for two years (1986–87 and 1987–88)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e2

“The PSI method caused 7 to 34 per cent increase in N fertilizer use efficiency over PT method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–624 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PSI urea application increased water use efficiency by 2 to 24 per cent over PT.

Treatment
PSI methode2
Outcome
water use efficiencye3
Direction
increasede3
Value
2 to 24 per cente3
Comparator
PT methode3
Setting
Field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Methods of Urea Application on Yield of Wheat, and Nitrogen Fertilizer and Water Use Efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“Field experiment was conducted for two years (1986–87 and 1987–88)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e2

“The PSI method caused 7 to 34 per cent increase in N fertilizer use efficiency over PT method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–624 · show in text ↑
e3

“It also increased water use efficiency (2 to 24 per cent) over PT method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–698 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The economic response dose with PSI urea application was lower than with PT under both irrigation regimes.

Treatment
PSI methode4
Outcome
economic response dosee4
Direction
lowere4
Qualifier
under both irrigation regimese4
Comparator
PT methode4
Setting
Field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Methods of Urea Application on Yield of Wheat, and Nitrogen Fertilizer and Water Use Efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“Field experiment was conducted for two years (1986–87 and 1987–88)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e4

“The economic response dose with PSI method was lower than PT method under both irrigation regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–797 · show in text ↑

irrigation · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

303 papers: 253 positive, 50 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

299 papers more in this group

See all 303 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.