Paper · 2014 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Performance of aromatic rice (Oryza sativa) genotypes as influenced by integrated nitrogen management

Lalji Yadav; R. N. Meena

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the rainy (kharif) season of 2010 and 2011 at Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, to study the performance of aromatic rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes as influenced by integrated nitrogen management (INM). The experiment was laid out in split-plot design with 3 replications. The treatments comprised 3 aromatic rice genotypes (‘Pusa Basmati 1’, ‘PRH 10’ and ‘HUR 105’) in main plots and 7 INM practices [100% recommended nitrogen dose (RND), 75% RND + 25% RND as farmyard manure/vermicompost (FYM/VC), 75% RND + 25% RND as FYM/VC] along with biofertilizer blue green algae (BGA)/Azospirillum in subplots. The genotype ‘PRH 10’ recorded significantly higher dry matter (DM) (36.8 g/hill), panicles/m2 (306.9), grains/panicle (133.0), 1,000-grain weight (22.4 g), grain yield (5.19 tonnes/ha), straw yield (7.55 tonnes/ha), total N uptake (103.0 kg/ha), N-use efficiency (57.6 kg/kg) and net returns ( 53,518/ha) than ‘Pusa Basmati 1’ but were at par with ‘HUR 105’. Among the INM, application of 75% RND + 25% RND as VC + BGA gave significantly highest plant height (105.8 cm), DM (39.5 g/hill), panicle/m2 (321.1), grains/panicle (138.2), 1,000-grain weight (22.7 g), grain yield (5.16 tonnes/ha), straw yield (7.77 tonnes/ha), total N uptake (105.7 kg/ha), N-use efficiency (57.3 kg/kg), net returns ( 54,376/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.0) over other treatments and remained at par with application of 75% RND + 25% RND as FYM + BGA.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PRH 10 had significantly higher dry matter (DM) than Pusa Basmati 1, and was at par with HUR 105.

Material
‘PRH 10’e0
Outcome
dry matter (DM)e0
Direction
highere0
Value
36.8 g/hille0
Qualifier
at par with ‘HUR 105’e0
Comparator
‘Pusa Basmati 1’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The genotype ‘PRH 10’ recorded significantly higher dry matter (DM) (36.8 g/hill), panicles/m2 (306.9), grains/panicle (133.0), 1,000-grain weight (22.4 g), grain yield (5.19 tonnes/ha), straw yield (7.55 tonnes/ha), total N uptake (103.0 kg/ha), N-use efficiency (57.6 kg/kg) and net returns ( 53,518/ha) than ‘Pusa Basmati 1’ but were at par with ‘HUR 105’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PRH 10 had significantly higher panicles/m2 than Pusa Basmati 1, and was at par with HUR 105.

Material
‘PRH 10’e0
Outcome
panicles/m2e0
Direction
highere0
Value
306.9e0
Qualifier
at par with ‘HUR 105’e0
Comparator
‘Pusa Basmati 1’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The genotype ‘PRH 10’ recorded significantly higher dry matter (DM) (36.8 g/hill), panicles/m2 (306.9), grains/panicle (133.0), 1,000-grain weight (22.4 g), grain yield (5.19 tonnes/ha), straw yield (7.55 tonnes/ha), total N uptake (103.0 kg/ha), N-use efficiency (57.6 kg/kg) and net returns ( 53,518/ha) than ‘Pusa Basmati 1’ but were at par with ‘HUR 105’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PRH 10 had significantly higher grains/panicle than Pusa Basmati 1, and was at par with HUR 105.

Material
‘PRH 10’e0
Outcome
grains/paniclee0
Direction
highere0
Value
133.0e0
Qualifier
at par with ‘HUR 105’e0
Comparator
‘Pusa Basmati 1’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The genotype ‘PRH 10’ recorded significantly higher dry matter (DM) (36.8 g/hill), panicles/m2 (306.9), grains/panicle (133.0), 1,000-grain weight (22.4 g), grain yield (5.19 tonnes/ha), straw yield (7.55 tonnes/ha), total N uptake (103.0 kg/ha), N-use efficiency (57.6 kg/kg) and net returns ( 53,518/ha) than ‘Pusa Basmati 1’ but were at par with ‘HUR 105’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PRH 10 had significantly higher 1,000-grain weight than Pusa Basmati 1, and was at par with HUR 105.

Material
‘PRH 10’e0
Outcome
1,000-grain weighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
22.4 ge0
Qualifier
at par with ‘HUR 105’e0
Comparator
‘Pusa Basmati 1’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The genotype ‘PRH 10’ recorded significantly higher dry matter (DM) (36.8 g/hill), panicles/m2 (306.9), grains/panicle (133.0), 1,000-grain weight (22.4 g), grain yield (5.19 tonnes/ha), straw yield (7.55 tonnes/ha), total N uptake (103.0 kg/ha), N-use efficiency (57.6 kg/kg) and net returns ( 53,518/ha) than ‘Pusa Basmati 1’ but were at par with ‘HUR 105’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PRH 10 had significantly higher grain yield than Pusa Basmati 1, and was at par with HUR 105.

Material
‘PRH 10’e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.19 tonnes/hae0
Qualifier
at par with ‘HUR 105’e0
Comparator
‘Pusa Basmati 1’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The genotype ‘PRH 10’ recorded significantly higher dry matter (DM) (36.8 g/hill), panicles/m2 (306.9), grains/panicle (133.0), 1,000-grain weight (22.4 g), grain yield (5.19 tonnes/ha), straw yield (7.55 tonnes/ha), total N uptake (103.0 kg/ha), N-use efficiency (57.6 kg/kg) and net returns ( 53,518/ha) than ‘Pusa Basmati 1’ but were at par with ‘HUR 105’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PRH 10 had significantly higher straw yield than Pusa Basmati 1, and was at par with HUR 105.

Material
‘PRH 10’e0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
7.55 tonnes/hae0
Qualifier
at par with ‘HUR 105’e0
Comparator
‘Pusa Basmati 1’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The genotype ‘PRH 10’ recorded significantly higher dry matter (DM) (36.8 g/hill), panicles/m2 (306.9), grains/panicle (133.0), 1,000-grain weight (22.4 g), grain yield (5.19 tonnes/ha), straw yield (7.55 tonnes/ha), total N uptake (103.0 kg/ha), N-use efficiency (57.6 kg/kg) and net returns ( 53,518/ha) than ‘Pusa Basmati 1’ but were at par with ‘HUR 105’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PRH 10 had significantly higher total N uptake than Pusa Basmati 1, and was at par with HUR 105.

Material
‘PRH 10’e0
Outcome
total N uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Value
103.0 kg/hae0
Qualifier
at par with ‘HUR 105’e0
Comparator
‘Pusa Basmati 1’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The genotype ‘PRH 10’ recorded significantly higher dry matter (DM) (36.8 g/hill), panicles/m2 (306.9), grains/panicle (133.0), 1,000-grain weight (22.4 g), grain yield (5.19 tonnes/ha), straw yield (7.55 tonnes/ha), total N uptake (103.0 kg/ha), N-use efficiency (57.6 kg/kg) and net returns ( 53,518/ha) than ‘Pusa Basmati 1’ but were at par with ‘HUR 105’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PRH 10 had significantly higher N-use efficiency than Pusa Basmati 1, and was at par with HUR 105.

Material
‘PRH 10’e0
Outcome
N-use efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
57.6 kg/kge0
Qualifier
at par with ‘HUR 105’e0
Comparator
‘Pusa Basmati 1’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The genotype ‘PRH 10’ recorded significantly higher dry matter (DM) (36.8 g/hill), panicles/m2 (306.9), grains/panicle (133.0), 1,000-grain weight (22.4 g), grain yield (5.19 tonnes/ha), straw yield (7.55 tonnes/ha), total N uptake (103.0 kg/ha), N-use efficiency (57.6 kg/kg) and net returns ( 53,518/ha) than ‘Pusa Basmati 1’ but were at par with ‘HUR 105’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PRH 10 had significantly higher net returns than Pusa Basmati 1, and was at par with HUR 105.

Material
‘PRH 10’e0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
53,518/hae0
Qualifier
at par with ‘HUR 105’e0
Comparator
‘Pusa Basmati 1’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The genotype ‘PRH 10’ recorded significantly higher dry matter (DM) (36.8 g/hill), panicles/m2 (306.9), grains/panicle (133.0), 1,000-grain weight (22.4 g), grain yield (5.19 tonnes/ha), straw yield (7.55 tonnes/ha), total N uptake (103.0 kg/ha), N-use efficiency (57.6 kg/kg) and net returns ( 53,518/ha) than ‘Pusa Basmati 1’ but were at par with ‘HUR 105’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The VC and BGA nitrogen treatment gave the highest plant height among treatments.

Treatment
75% RND + 25% RND as VC + BGAe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
105.8 cme0
Qualifier
at par with application of 75% RND + 25% RND as FYM + BGAe0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the INM, application of 75% RND + 25% RND as VC + BGA gave significantly highest plant height (105.8 cm), DM (39.5 g/hill), panicle/m2 (321.1), grains/panicle (138.2), 1,000-grain weight (22.7 g), grain yield (5.16 tonnes/ha), straw yield (7.77 tonnes/ha), total N uptake (105.7 kg/ha), N-use efficiency (57.3 kg/kg), net returns ( 54,376/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.0) over other treatments and remained at par with application of 75% RND + 25% RND as FYM + BGA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The VC and BGA nitrogen treatment gave the highest DM among treatments.

Treatment
75% RND + 25% RND as VC + BGAe0
Outcome
DMe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
39.5 g/hille0
Qualifier
at par with application of 75% RND + 25% RND as FYM + BGAe0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the INM, application of 75% RND + 25% RND as VC + BGA gave significantly highest plant height (105.8 cm), DM (39.5 g/hill), panicle/m2 (321.1), grains/panicle (138.2), 1,000-grain weight (22.7 g), grain yield (5.16 tonnes/ha), straw yield (7.77 tonnes/ha), total N uptake (105.7 kg/ha), N-use efficiency (57.3 kg/kg), net returns ( 54,376/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.0) over other treatments and remained at par with application of 75% RND + 25% RND as FYM + BGA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The VC and BGA nitrogen treatment gave the highest panicle/m2 among treatments.

Treatment
75% RND + 25% RND as VC + BGAe0
Outcome
panicle/m2e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
321.1e0
Qualifier
at par with application of 75% RND + 25% RND as FYM + BGAe0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the INM, application of 75% RND + 25% RND as VC + BGA gave significantly highest plant height (105.8 cm), DM (39.5 g/hill), panicle/m2 (321.1), grains/panicle (138.2), 1,000-grain weight (22.7 g), grain yield (5.16 tonnes/ha), straw yield (7.77 tonnes/ha), total N uptake (105.7 kg/ha), N-use efficiency (57.3 kg/kg), net returns ( 54,376/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.0) over other treatments and remained at par with application of 75% RND + 25% RND as FYM + BGA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The VC and BGA nitrogen treatment gave the highest grains/panicle among treatments.

Treatment
75% RND + 25% RND as VC + BGAe0
Outcome
grains/paniclee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
138.2e0
Qualifier
at par with application of 75% RND + 25% RND as FYM + BGAe0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the INM, application of 75% RND + 25% RND as VC + BGA gave significantly highest plant height (105.8 cm), DM (39.5 g/hill), panicle/m2 (321.1), grains/panicle (138.2), 1,000-grain weight (22.7 g), grain yield (5.16 tonnes/ha), straw yield (7.77 tonnes/ha), total N uptake (105.7 kg/ha), N-use efficiency (57.3 kg/kg), net returns ( 54,376/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.0) over other treatments and remained at par with application of 75% RND + 25% RND as FYM + BGA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The VC and BGA nitrogen treatment gave the highest 1,000-grain weight among treatments.

Treatment
75% RND + 25% RND as VC + BGAe0
Outcome
1,000-grain weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
22.7 ge0
Qualifier
at par with application of 75% RND + 25% RND as FYM + BGAe0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the INM, application of 75% RND + 25% RND as VC + BGA gave significantly highest plant height (105.8 cm), DM (39.5 g/hill), panicle/m2 (321.1), grains/panicle (138.2), 1,000-grain weight (22.7 g), grain yield (5.16 tonnes/ha), straw yield (7.77 tonnes/ha), total N uptake (105.7 kg/ha), N-use efficiency (57.3 kg/kg), net returns ( 54,376/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.0) over other treatments and remained at par with application of 75% RND + 25% RND as FYM + BGA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The VC and BGA nitrogen treatment gave the highest grain yield among treatments.

Treatment
75% RND + 25% RND as VC + BGAe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.16 tonnes/hae0
Qualifier
at par with application of 75% RND + 25% RND as FYM + BGAe0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the INM, application of 75% RND + 25% RND as VC + BGA gave significantly highest plant height (105.8 cm), DM (39.5 g/hill), panicle/m2 (321.1), grains/panicle (138.2), 1,000-grain weight (22.7 g), grain yield (5.16 tonnes/ha), straw yield (7.77 tonnes/ha), total N uptake (105.7 kg/ha), N-use efficiency (57.3 kg/kg), net returns ( 54,376/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.0) over other treatments and remained at par with application of 75% RND + 25% RND as FYM + BGA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The VC and BGA nitrogen treatment gave the highest straw yield among treatments.

Treatment
75% RND + 25% RND as VC + BGAe0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
7.77 tonnes/hae0
Qualifier
at par with application of 75% RND + 25% RND as FYM + BGAe0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the INM, application of 75% RND + 25% RND as VC + BGA gave significantly highest plant height (105.8 cm), DM (39.5 g/hill), panicle/m2 (321.1), grains/panicle (138.2), 1,000-grain weight (22.7 g), grain yield (5.16 tonnes/ha), straw yield (7.77 tonnes/ha), total N uptake (105.7 kg/ha), N-use efficiency (57.3 kg/kg), net returns ( 54,376/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.0) over other treatments and remained at par with application of 75% RND + 25% RND as FYM + BGA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The VC and BGA nitrogen treatment gave the highest total N uptake among treatments.

Treatment
75% RND + 25% RND as VC + BGAe0
Outcome
total N uptakee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
105.7 kg/hae0
Qualifier
at par with application of 75% RND + 25% RND as FYM + BGAe0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the INM, application of 75% RND + 25% RND as VC + BGA gave significantly highest plant height (105.8 cm), DM (39.5 g/hill), panicle/m2 (321.1), grains/panicle (138.2), 1,000-grain weight (22.7 g), grain yield (5.16 tonnes/ha), straw yield (7.77 tonnes/ha), total N uptake (105.7 kg/ha), N-use efficiency (57.3 kg/kg), net returns ( 54,376/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.0) over other treatments and remained at par with application of 75% RND + 25% RND as FYM + BGA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The VC and BGA nitrogen treatment gave the highest N-use efficiency among treatments.

Treatment
75% RND + 25% RND as VC + BGAe0
Outcome
N-use efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
57.3 kg/kge0
Qualifier
at par with application of 75% RND + 25% RND as FYM + BGAe0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the INM, application of 75% RND + 25% RND as VC + BGA gave significantly highest plant height (105.8 cm), DM (39.5 g/hill), panicle/m2 (321.1), grains/panicle (138.2), 1,000-grain weight (22.7 g), grain yield (5.16 tonnes/ha), straw yield (7.77 tonnes/ha), total N uptake (105.7 kg/ha), N-use efficiency (57.3 kg/kg), net returns ( 54,376/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.0) over other treatments and remained at par with application of 75% RND + 25% RND as FYM + BGA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The VC and BGA nitrogen treatment gave the highest net returns among treatments.

Treatment
75% RND + 25% RND as VC + BGAe0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
54,376/hae0
Qualifier
at par with application of 75% RND + 25% RND as FYM + BGAe0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the INM, application of 75% RND + 25% RND as VC + BGA gave significantly highest plant height (105.8 cm), DM (39.5 g/hill), panicle/m2 (321.1), grains/panicle (138.2), 1,000-grain weight (22.7 g), grain yield (5.16 tonnes/ha), straw yield (7.77 tonnes/ha), total N uptake (105.7 kg/ha), N-use efficiency (57.3 kg/kg), net returns ( 54,376/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.0) over other treatments and remained at par with application of 75% RND + 25% RND as FYM + BGA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The VC and BGA nitrogen treatment gave the highest benefit: cost ratio among treatments.

Treatment
75% RND + 25% RND as VC + BGAe0
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.0e0
Qualifier
at par with application of 75% RND + 25% RND as FYM + BGAe0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the INM, application of 75% RND + 25% RND as VC + BGA gave significantly highest plant height (105.8 cm), DM (39.5 g/hill), panicle/m2 (321.1), grains/panicle (138.2), 1,000-grain weight (22.7 g), grain yield (5.16 tonnes/ha), straw yield (7.77 tonnes/ha), total N uptake (105.7 kg/ha), N-use efficiency (57.3 kg/kg), net returns ( 54,376/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.0) over other treatments and remained at par with application of 75% RND + 25% RND as FYM + BGA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑

Cyanobacteriota · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 32 positive, 1 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Cyanobacteriota · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Cyanobacteriota · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Cyanobacteriota · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 217 positive, 45 negative or no effect

216 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

464 papers: 409 positive, 55 negative or no effect

408 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

460 papers more in this group

See all 464 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

401 papers in the same direction as this paper · 101 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.