Abstract
A glass house study was conducted to test the efficacy of oviparasitic fungus, Paecilomyces lilacinus against rootknot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita on okra. The results showed that the application of P. lilacinus as seed treatment @10, 15, & 20 g/kg seed and soil application @ 1.5 and 3% w/w significantly increased plant growth characters of okra and suppressed galls, egg masses/plant and eggs/egg mass. Of the two types of fungal applications tried, soil application was found to be better in increasing plant growth characters and reducing rootknot nematode population compared to nematode alone treatment. Maximum reduction in galls, egg masses, eggs/egg mass was 26.8, 36.8 and 40.6%, respectively in treatment that received soil application of P. lilacinus @ 3% w/w.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatment (10, 15 and 20 g/kg seed) and soil application (1.5 and 3% w/w) of Paecilomyces lilacinus significantly increased plant growth characters of okra in a glass house study with root-knot nematode.
- Taxon
- okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentuse1 - Treatment
- P. lilacinus as seed treatment @10, 15, & 20 g/kg seed and soil application @ 1.5 and 3% w/we1
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitae0pest - Second interactor
- P. lilacinus
Purpureocillium lilacinume1biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- plant growth characterse1
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparatorValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“against rootknot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita on okra”
e1“the application of P. lilacinus as seed treatment @10, 15, & 20 g/kg seed and soil application @ 1.5 and 3% w/w significantly increased plant growth characters of okra”
Claim · model-written summary
The same P. lilacinus seed and soil applications significantly suppressed galls, egg masses per plant and eggs per egg mass of Meloidogyne incognita on okra.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- P. lilacinus as seed treatment @10, 15, & 20 g/kg seed and soil application @ 1.5 and 3% w/we1
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
- Second interactor
- P. lilacinusPurpureocillium lilacinume1biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- galls, egg masses/plant and eggs/egg masse1
- Direction
- suppressede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“against rootknot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita on okra”
e1“the application of P. lilacinus as seed treatment @10, 15, & 20 g/kg seed and soil application @ 1.5 and 3% w/w significantly increased plant growth characters of okra and suppressed galls, egg masses/plant and eggs/egg mass”
Claim · model-written summary
Of the two ways of applying P. lilacinus, soil application was better than seed treatment at increasing okra growth characters and reducing the root-knot nematode population.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- soil applicatione1
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
- Outcome
- increasing plant growth characters and reducing rootknot nematode populatione1
- Direction
- bettere1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Meloidogyne incognita on okra”
e1“soil application was found to be better in increasing plant growth characters and reducing rootknot nematode population compared to nematode alone treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
The maximum reduction in galls was 26.8%, with soil application of P. lilacinus at 3% w/w.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- soil application of P. lilacinus @ 3% w/we1
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
- Second interactor
- P. lilacinusPurpureocillium lilacinume1biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- gallse1
- Direction
- reductione1
- Value
- 26.8e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“against rootknot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita on okra”
e1“Maximum reduction in galls, egg masses, eggs/egg mass was 26.8, 36.8 and 40.6%, respectively in treatment that received soil application of P. lilacinus @ 3% w/w”
Claim · model-written summary
The maximum reduction in egg masses was 36.8%, with soil application of P. lilacinus at 3% w/w.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- soil application of P. lilacinus @ 3% w/we1
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
- Second interactor
- P. lilacinusPurpureocillium lilacinume1biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- egg massese1
- Direction
- reductione1
- Value
- 36.8e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“against rootknot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita on okra”
e1“Maximum reduction in galls, egg masses, eggs/egg mass was 26.8, 36.8 and 40.6%, respectively in treatment that received soil application of P. lilacinus @ 3% w/w”
Claim · model-written summary
The maximum reduction in eggs per egg mass was 40.6%, with soil application of P. lilacinus at 3% w/w.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- soil application of P. lilacinus @ 3% w/we1
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
- Second interactor
- P. lilacinusPurpureocillium lilacinume1biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- eggs/egg masse1
- Direction
- reductione1
- Value
- 40.6%e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“against rootknot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita on okra”
e1“Maximum reduction in galls, egg masses, eggs/egg mass was 26.8, 36.8 and 40.6%, respectively in treatment that received soil application of P. lilacinus @ 3% w/w”
The same questions in other papers
Purpureocillium lilacinum · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
12 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →phosphorus · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →application · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
12 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →seed treatment · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
15 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.