Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during the kharif and rabi season of 2000-04 at Indian Institute of Pulses Re- search, Kanpur to find out the performance of maize ( Zea mays L.)-chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) cropping se- quence with sulphur fertilization along with farmyard manure (FYM). Inorganic S at 0 and 20 kg/ha was applied during kharif maize cultivation and in rabi season, three levels of S (0, 10 and 20 kg/ha) were applied with 2 levels of FYM (0 and 4 t/ha). Maize grain yield increased by 0.59 t with the application of 20 kg S/ha over control (1.99 t/ ha). Significant positive effects of 20 kg/ha of S as manifested on growth, yield attributes, yield, S uptake, S utiliza- tion and economics of maize were not further carried over to following chickpea crop. However, in chickpea nodu- lation, grain and straw yield, protein content, and S uptake significantly increased due to application of sulphur along with FYM application. Higher mean nodule number (19.38), nodule dry weight (0.213 g/plant), grain yield (1.69 t/ha), straw yield (1.78 t/ha), and S uptake (15.6 kg/ha) was found with the 20 kg/ha of S fertilization. But utili- zation of added S decreased with increased S supply. Net return and return per rupee investment of the system also increased due to application of S and FYM to chickpea.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 16
Claim · model-written summary
Applying 20 kg S/ha increased maize grain yield by 0.59 t over control.
- Treatment
- 20 kg S/hae0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 0.59 te0
- Qualifier
- 1.99 t/ hae0
- Comparator
- controle0
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maize grain yield increased by 0.59 t with the application of 20 kg S/ha over control (1.99 t/ ha).”
Claim · model-written summary
20 kg/ha sulphur significantly benefited maize growth, yield attributes and yield.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significant positive effects of 20 kg/ha of S as manifested on growth, yield attributes, yield, S uptake, S utiliza- tion and economics of maize were not further carried over to following chickpea crop.”
Claim · model-written summary
20 kg/ha sulphur significantly benefited maize sulphur uptake and utilization.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significant positive effects of 20 kg/ha of S as manifested on growth, yield attributes, yield, S uptake, S utiliza- tion and economics of maize were not further carried over to following chickpea crop.”
Claim · model-written summary
20 kg/ha sulphur significantly benefited maize economics.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“Significant positive effects of 20 kg/ha of S as manifested on growth, yield attributes, yield, S uptake, S utiliza- tion and economics of maize were not further carried over to following chickpea crop.”
Claim · model-written summary
The positive maize growth, yield attribute and yield effects did not carry over to chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- 20 kg/ha of Se0
- Outcome
- growth, yield attributes, yielde0
- Direction
- not further carried overe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significant positive effects of 20 kg/ha of S as manifested on growth, yield attributes, yield, S uptake, S utiliza- tion and economics of maize were not further carried over to following chickpea crop.”
Claim · model-written summary
The positive maize sulphur uptake and utilization effects did not carry over to chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- 20 kg/ha of Se0
- Outcome
- S uptake, S utiliza- tione0
- Direction
- not further carried overe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significant positive effects of 20 kg/ha of S as manifested on growth, yield attributes, yield, S uptake, S utiliza- tion and economics of maize were not further carried over to following chickpea crop.”
Claim · model-written summary
The maize economic benefits of sulphur did not carry over to chickpea.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“Significant positive effects of 20 kg/ha of S as manifested on growth, yield attributes, yield, S uptake, S utiliza- tion and economics of maize were not further carried over to following chickpea crop.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulphur with FYM significantly increased chickpea nodulation, grain yield and straw yield.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- application of sulphur along with FYM applicatione0
- Outcome
- nodu- lation, grain and straw yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“However, in chickpea nodu- lation, grain and straw yield, protein content, and S uptake significantly increased due to application of sulphur along with FYM application.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulphur with FYM significantly increased chickpea protein content and sulphur uptake.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- application of sulphur along with FYM applicatione0
- Outcome
- protein content, and S uptakee0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“However, in chickpea nodu- lation, grain and straw yield, protein content, and S uptake significantly increased due to application of sulphur along with FYM application.”
Claim · model-written summary
20 kg/ha sulphur produced a higher mean chickpea nodule number of 19.38.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- 20 kg/ha of S fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- mean nodule numbere0
- Direction
- Highere0
- Value
- 19.38e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Higher mean nodule number (19.38), nodule dry weight (0.213 g/plant), grain yield (1.69 t/ha), straw yield (1.78 t/ha), and S uptake (15.6 kg/ha) was found with the 20 kg/ha of S fertilization.”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
20 kg/ha sulphur produced higher chickpea nodule dry weight of 0.213 g/plant.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- 20 kg/ha of S fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- nodule dry weighte0
- Direction
- Highere0
- Value
- 0.213 g/plante0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Higher mean nodule number (19.38), nodule dry weight (0.213 g/plant), grain yield (1.69 t/ha), straw yield (1.78 t/ha), and S uptake (15.6 kg/ha) was found with the 20 kg/ha of S fertilization.”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
20 kg/ha sulphur produced higher chickpea grain yield of 1.69 t/ha.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- 20 kg/ha of S fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- Highere0
- Value
- 1.69 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Higher mean nodule number (19.38), nodule dry weight (0.213 g/plant), grain yield (1.69 t/ha), straw yield (1.78 t/ha), and S uptake (15.6 kg/ha) was found with the 20 kg/ha of S fertilization.”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
20 kg/ha sulphur produced higher chickpea straw yield of 1.78 t/ha.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- 20 kg/ha of S fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- straw yielde0
- Direction
- Highere0
- Value
- 1.78 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Higher mean nodule number (19.38), nodule dry weight (0.213 g/plant), grain yield (1.69 t/ha), straw yield (1.78 t/ha), and S uptake (15.6 kg/ha) was found with the 20 kg/ha of S fertilization.”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
20 kg/ha sulphur produced higher chickpea sulphur uptake of 15.6 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- 20 kg/ha of S fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- S uptakee0
- Direction
- Highere0
- Value
- 15.6 kg/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Higher mean nodule number (19.38), nodule dry weight (0.213 g/plant), grain yield (1.69 t/ha), straw yield (1.78 t/ha), and S uptake (15.6 kg/ha) was found with the 20 kg/ha of S fertilization.”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Utilization of added sulphur decreased as sulphur supply increased.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- increased S supplye0
- Outcome
- utili- zation of added Se0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“But utili- zation of added S decreased with increased S supply.”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Applying sulphur and FYM to chickpea increased system net return and return per rupee investment.
- Treatment
- application of S and FYM to chickpeae0
- Outcome
- Net return and return per rupee investmente0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“Net return and return per rupee investment of the system also increased due to application of S and FYM to chickpea.”
The same questions in other papers
sulfur atom · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →sulfur atom · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
13 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
16 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →sulfur atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
36 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
33 papers more in this group
See all 37 papers →fertilization · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
44 papers more in this group
See all 48 papers →fertilization · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
46 papers more in this group
See all 50 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
77 papers more in this group
See all 81 papers →fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
341 papers more in this group
See all 345 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.