Paper · 2014 · BIOINFOLET - A Quarterly Journal of Life Sciences

Nutrient uptake, soil nutrient status, and grain yield of chickpea as influenced by phosphorus sources and seed priming

P. S. Pattar; C. P. Mansur; S. C. Alagundagi; et al.

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Application of recommended dose of phosphorus through FYM cured DAP and seed priming with 2% SSP recorded higher grain yield of 1705 kg/ha. with. significantly higher uptake of nitrogen (102.80 kg/ha), phosphorus (9.05 kg/ha) and potash (102.75 kg/ha), Application of recommended P though FYM recorded higher available soil nitrogen (259.33 kg/ha) phosphorus (25.47 kg/ha) and potash (448.18 kg/ha) after harvesting the crop

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM cured DAP and 2% SSP seed priming gave chickpea grain yield of 1705 kg/ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Application of recommended dose of phosphorus through FYM cured DAP and seed priming with 2% SSPe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1705 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of recommended dose of phosphorus through FYM cured DAP and seed priming with 2% SSP recorded higher grain yield of 1705 kg/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–139 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The phosphorus and priming treatment increased chickpea nitrogen uptake to 102.80 kg/ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Application of recommended dose of phosphorus through FYM cured DAP and seed priming with 2% SSPe1
Outcome
uptake of nitrogene0
Direction
highere0
Value
102.80 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher uptake of nitrogen (102.80 kg/ha), phosphorus (9.05 kg/ha) and potash (102.75 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–251 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of recommended dose of phosphorus through FYM cured DAP and seed priming with 2% SSP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The phosphorus and priming treatment increased chickpea phosphorus uptake to 9.05 kg/ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Application of recommended dose of phosphorus through FYM cured DAP and seed priming with 2% SSPe1
Outcome
phosphoruse0
Direction
highere0
Value
9.05 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher uptake of nitrogen (102.80 kg/ha), phosphorus (9.05 kg/ha) and potash (102.75 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–251 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of recommended dose of phosphorus through FYM cured DAP and seed priming with 2% SSP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The phosphorus and priming treatment increased chickpea potash uptake to 102.75 kg/ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Application of recommended dose of phosphorus through FYM cured DAP and seed priming with 2% SSPe1
Outcome
potashe0
Direction
highere0
Value
102.75 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher uptake of nitrogen (102.80 kg/ha), phosphorus (9.05 kg/ha) and potash (102.75 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–251 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of recommended dose of phosphorus through FYM cured DAP and seed priming with 2% SSP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM phosphorus application left higher available soil nitrogen after chickpea harvest, at 259.33 kg/ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Application of recommended P though FYMe0
Outcome
available soil nitrogene0
Direction
highere0
Value
259.33 kg/hae0
Qualifier
after harvesting the crope0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of recommended P though FYM recorded higher available soil nitrogen (259.33 kg/ha) phosphorus (25.47 kg/ha) and potash (448.18 kg/ha) after harvesting the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–424 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM phosphorus application left higher available soil phosphorus after chickpea harvest, at 25.47 kg/ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Application of recommended P though FYMe0
Outcome
phosphoruse0
Direction
highere0
Value
25.47 kg/hae0
Qualifier
after harvesting the crope0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of recommended P though FYM recorded higher available soil nitrogen (259.33 kg/ha) phosphorus (25.47 kg/ha) and potash (448.18 kg/ha) after harvesting the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–424 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM phosphorus application left higher available soil potash after chickpea harvest, at 448.18 kg/ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Application of recommended P though FYMe0
Outcome
potashe0
Direction
highere0
Value
448.18 kg/hae0
Qualifier
after harvesting the crope0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of recommended P though FYM recorded higher available soil nitrogen (259.33 kg/ha) phosphorus (25.47 kg/ha) and potash (448.18 kg/ha) after harvesting the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–424 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

90 papers: 82 positive, 8 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

phosphorus · molecular: metabolites · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 37 positive, 1 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 80 positive, 1 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 161 positive, 7 negative or no effect

160 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

164 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

seed treatment · molecular: metabolites · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.