Paper · 2005 · Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science

Effect of soil water conservation practices on root growth, yield, nutrient removal and quality of pea and tomato crops

M.L. Verma; Rakesh Kumar Sharma; A.R. Bhandari

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field studies were conducted during 1996–97, 1997–98 and 1998–99 on gravely sandy loam soil, to study the effect of different soil water conservation practices on root growth, yield, nutrient removal and quality of pea and tomato crops. Root growth parameters viz., root mass density (RMD), root volume (RV) and root length density (RLD), recorded at flowering stage and at crop harvest in pea and tomato crops, were found maximum under conventional tillage with straw mulch and manual weeding (C+SM+MW) treatment (T5) as compared to conventional tillage (C) treatment (T1). The C+SM+MW treatment produced maximum yield of green pods and straw in pea and fruit and straw in tomato crop. Maximum macronutrient element (N, P, K, Ca, Mg and S) removal by pea (pods and straw) and tomato (fruit and straw) crops were also recorded in T5 (C+SM+MW) treatment, as compared to T1 (C) treatment. Quality characteristics of pea and tomato crops were also found better under T5 treatment, as compared to T1 treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root growth parameters were maximum under conventional tillage with straw mulch and manual weeding compared with conventional tillage in pea and tomato.

Treatment
conventional tillage with straw mulch and manual weeding (C+SM+MW)e0
Outcome
Root growth parameterse0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
conventional tillage (C)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root growth parameters viz., root mass density (RMD), root volume (RV) and root length density (RLD), recorded at flowering stage and at crop harvest in pea and tomato crops, were found maximum under conventional tillage with straw mulch and manual weeding (C+SM+MW) treatment (T5) as compared to conventional tillage (C) treatment (T1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–573 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The C+SM+MW treatment gave the maximum yield of green pods and straw in pea.

Treatment
C+SM+MW treatmente1
Outcome
yield of green pods and strawe1
Direction
maximume1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The C+SM+MW treatment produced maximum yield of green pods and straw in pea and fruit and straw in tomato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–685 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The C+SM+MW treatment gave the maximum yield of fruit and straw in tomato.

Treatment
C+SM+MW treatmente1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
maximume1
Qualifier
fruit and strawe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The C+SM+MW treatment produced maximum yield of green pods and straw in pea and fruit and straw in tomato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–685 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Macronutrient removal by pea and tomato was maximum under T5 (C+SM+MW) compared with T1 (C).

Treatment
T5 (C+SM+MW) treatmente2
Outcome
macronutrient element (N, P, K, Ca, Mg and S) removale2
Direction
Maximume2
Comparator
T1 (C) treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Maximum macronutrient element (N, P, K, Ca, Mg and S) removal by pea (pods and straw) and tomato (fruit and straw) crops were also recorded in T5 (C+SM+MW) treatment, as compared to T1 (C) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quality characteristics of pea and tomato were better under T5 than under T1.

Treatment
T5 treatmente3
Outcome
Quality characteristicse3
Direction
bettere3
Comparator
T1 treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Quality characteristics of pea and tomato crops were also found better under T5 treatment, as compared to T1 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1005 · show in text ↑

organic · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

herbicide · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 8 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

tillage · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

herbicide · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 12 positive, 8 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

tillage · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 16 positive, 7 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

organic · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 22 positive, 9 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.