Paper · 2010 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

EFFECT OF TILLAGE, WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.) RESIDUE & NITROGEN MANAGEMENT ON CORN (ZEA MAYS) YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS

Fatemeh Abdollahi; H. Ghadiri; M. J. Bahrani

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Conservation tillage practices integrated with appropriate residue management is an efficient approach in sustainable agriculture to prevent the removal or burning of crop residues. Two years field experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of wheat residue management on yield, yield component and morphophysiological characteristics of corn. Experimental design was split plot using three factors. Main factor was three tillage systems including moldboard plow, once and two times chisel plow; and sub factors were four wheat residues (0, 25, 50 and 75%) and three nitrogen levels (69, 103.5 and 138 kg/ha). With increase in residue levels and decrease in tillage and nitrogen levels, grain and biological yields and grain number per ear decreased, but thousand grains weight was not significantly different among treatments. Although tillage had no significant effect on leaf area index, increase in residue and decrease in nitrogen levels, decreased corn leaf area index. Since there was no significant difference between two times chisel plow with 25% wheat residue + 103.5 kg N/ha, and moldboard plow with 0% wheat residue + 138 kg N/ha treatments, maintenance of 25% wheat residues, and application of a lower nitrogen rate (103.5 kg N/ha) is recommended in order to achieve sustainability in corn fields. Keywords: Residue management, Soil conservation, Corn planting, Nitrogen

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher residue and lower tillage and nitrogen levels decreased corn grain and biological yields.

Treatment
increase in residue levels and decrease in tillage and nitrogen levelse0
Outcome
grain and biological yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With increase in residue levels and decrease in tillage and nitrogen levels, grain and biological yields and grain number per ear decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–765 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN (ZEA MAYS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher residue and lower tillage and nitrogen levels decreased corn grain number per ear.

Treatment
increase in residue levels and decrease in tillage and nitrogen levelse0
Outcome
grain number per eare0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With increase in residue levels and decrease in tillage and nitrogen levels, grain and biological yields and grain number per ear decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–765 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN (ZEA MAYS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thousand grains weight did not differ significantly among treatments.

Outcome
thousand grains weighte0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
among treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thousand grains weight was not significantly different among treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–842 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN (ZEA MAYS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage had no significant effect on corn leaf area index.

Treatment
tillagee0
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tillage had no significant effect on leaf area index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–905 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN (ZEA MAYS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing residue and decreasing nitrogen reduced corn leaf area index.

Treatment
increase in residue and decrease in nitrogen levelse0
Outcome
corn leaf area indexe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase in residue and decrease in nitrogen levels, decreased corn leaf area index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two times chisel plow with 25% wheat residue and 103.5 kg N/ha did not differ significantly from moldboard plow with 0% residue and 138 kg N/ha.

Treatment
two times chisel plow with 25% wheat residue + 103.5 kg N/hae0
Outcome
no significant differencee0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
moldboard plow with 0% wheat residue + 138 kg N/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant difference between two times chisel plow with 25% wheat residue + 103.5 kg N/ha, and moldboard plow with 0% wheat residue + 138 kg N/ha treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN (ZEA MAYS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–96 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend retaining 25% wheat residue and applying 103.5 kg N/ha for sustainable corn production.

Outcome
maintenance of 25% wheat residues, and application of a lower nitrogen rate (103.5 kg N/ha)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maintenance of 25% wheat residues, and application of a lower nitrogen rate (103.5 kg N/ha) is recommended in order to achieve sustainability in corn fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1327 · show in text ↑

tillage · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 196 positive, 87 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 196 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

748 papers: 619 positive, 129 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 619 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

744 papers more in this group

See all 748 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

278 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,906 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.