Abstract
An experiment was conducted at Hatay in experimental station and farmers field during 1995-96 and 1996-97 season to work out the response of pea cv. Marmara to Rhizobium inoculation and chemical fertilization. Rhizobium inoculation increased the number of nodules and nodules dry weight in both year and location significantly. Nodulation status were superior in farmers field which has persistent history of legume cultivation. Nitrogen application and inoculation significantly increased total above ground dry matter except farmers field in 1996-97, and seed yields over uninoculated and without nitrogen given plots in both location. The highest above ground dry matter and seed yields were obtained from nitrogen+phosphorus (10 kg N, 5 kg P2O5/da) application and followed by nitrogen alone (10 kg N/da) and inoculation. However, nitrogen alone and inoculation was produced similar seed yield. Application of nitrogen and inoculation did not differ significantly, plant nitrogen percent at flowering, except 1995-96 Soğuksu, and seed nitrogen content.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium inoculation significantly increased nodule number and nodule dry weight across years and locations.
- Taxon
- Pea (Pisum sativum L.)
Lathyrus oleraceust0 - Treatment
- Rhizobium inoculatione0
- Outcome
- number of nodules and nodules dry weighte0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Rhizobium inoculation increased the number of nodules and nodules dry weight in both year and location significantly”
t0“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nodulation was superior in farmers field with a history of legumes.
- Taxon
- Pea (Pisum sativum L.)
Lathyrus oleraceust0 - Outcome
- Nodulation statuse0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Setting
- farmers fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Nodulation status were superior in farmers field which has persistent history of legume cultivation”
t0“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen application and inoculation significantly increased aboveground dry matter except in farmers field in 1996-97.
- Taxon
- Pea (Pisum sativum L.)
Lathyrus oleraceust0 - Treatment
- Nitrogen application and inoculatione0
- Outcome
- total above ground dry mattere0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- except farmers field in 1996-97e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Nitrogen application and inoculation significantly increased total above ground dry matter except farmers field in 1996-97”
t0“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
t1“Rhizobium Inoculation and Fertilization on Nodulation and Yield of Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen application and inoculation significantly increased seed yield over plots without either treatment.
- Taxon
- Pea (Pisum sativum L.)
Lathyrus oleraceust0 - Treatment
- Nitrogen application and inoculatione0
- Outcome
- seed yieldse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- uninoculated and without nitrogen given plotse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Nitrogen application and inoculation significantly increased total above ground dry matter except farmers field in 1996-97, and seed yields over uninoculated and without nitrogen given plots in both location”
t0“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
t1“Rhizobium Inoculation and Fertilization on Nodulation and Yield of Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen plus phosphorus gave the highest aboveground dry matter and seed yield.
- Taxon
- Pea (Pisum sativum L.)
Lathyrus oleraceust0 - Treatment
- nitrogen+phosphorus (10 kg N, 5 kg P2O5/da) applicatione0
- Outcome
- above ground dry matter and seed yieldse0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- nitrogen alone (10 kg N/da)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The highest above ground dry matter and seed yields were obtained from nitrogen+phosphorus (10 kg N, 5 kg P2O5/da) application and followed by nitrogen alone (10 kg N/da) and inoculation”
t0“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen alone and inoculation produced similar seed yield.
- Taxon
- Pea (Pisum sativum L.)
Lathyrus oleraceust0 - Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- similare0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“nitrogen alone and inoculation was produced similar seed yield”
t0“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
t1“Rhizobium Inoculation and Fertilization on Nodulation and Yield of Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen application and inoculation did not differ significantly in plant nitrogen percent at flowering except at 1995-96 Soğuksu.
- Taxon
- Pea (Pisum sativum L.)
Lathyrus oleraceust0 - Outcome
- plant nitrogen percent at floweringe0
- Direction
- did not differ significantlye0
- Setting
- Soğuksue0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Application of nitrogen and inoculation did not differ significantly, plant nitrogen percent at flowering, except 1995-96 Soğuksu, and seed nitrogen content”
t0“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
t1“Rhizobium Inoculation and Fertilization on Nodulation and Yield of Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen application and inoculation did not differ significantly in seed nitrogen content.
- Taxon
- Pea (Pisum sativum L.)
Lathyrus oleraceust0 - Outcome
- seed nitrogen contente0
- Direction
- did not differ significantlye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Application of nitrogen and inoculation did not differ significantly, plant nitrogen percent at flowering, except 1995-96 Soğuksu, and seed nitrogen content”
t0“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
t1“Rhizobium Inoculation and Fertilization on Nodulation and Yield of Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · symbiosis · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →inoculation · Rhizobium · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →inoculation · symbiosis · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ
44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
51 papers more in this group
See all 55 papers →nitrogen · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ
58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
72 papers more in this group
See all 76 papers →nitrogen · Rhizobium · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →phosphorus · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
61 papers more in this group
See all 65 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.