Paper · 2016 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

The impact of canopy managements on grape and wine composition of cv. ‘Istrian Malvasia’ (Vitis vinifera L.)

Jan Rescic; Maja Mikulic‐Petkovsek; Denis Rusjan

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
17
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The interest in producing wines preferred by consumers increases the need for improving practices to modify grape and wine composition. The aim of this study was to assess the impacts of three different canopy management measures, (1) early leaf removal in the cluster zone, (2) removal of young leaves above the second pair of wires and (3) Double Maturation Raisonnée, on the yield and chemical composition of 'Istrian Malvasia' grape and wine. RESULTS: ) were measured at early leaf removal. Leaf removal at véraison caused an unexpected augmentation of flavonols in the berry skin. Early leaf removal resulted in significantly lower extracts of wine. Nevertheless, they reached the highest mark (16.5 out of 20.0 points) in sensory evaluation compared with leaf removal at véraison and Double Maturation Raisonnée (15.0 points) and control (16.0 points). CONCLUSION: Leaf removal at véraison and Double Maturation Raisonnée improved the phenolic composition of wine, producing a full-bodied wine. On the other hand, early leaf removal significantly augmented the yield and titratable acidity, hydroxycinnamic acids and flavanols of wine, which might have led to a fresher but less-bodied wine. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf removal at véraison increased berry skin flavonols.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
Leaf removal at véraisone0
Outcome
flavonols in the berry skine0
Direction
augmentatione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf removal at véraison caused an unexpected augmentation of flavonols in the berry skin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–597 · show in text ↑
t0

“The impact of canopy managements on grape and wine composition of cv. ‘Istrian Malvasia’ (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early leaf removal produced significantly lower wine extracts.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
Early leaf removale0
Outcome
extracts of winee0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Early leaf removal resulted in significantly lower extracts of wine.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–666 · show in text ↑
t0

“The impact of canopy managements on grape and wine composition of cv. ‘Istrian Malvasia’ (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early leaf removal produced the highest sensory score, 16.5 of 20.0, against 15.0 for other canopy treatments and 16.0 for control.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
sensory evaluatione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
16.5 out of 20.0 pointse0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTreatment

Verbatim

e0

“they reached the highest mark (16.5 out of 20.0 points) in sensory evaluation compared with leaf removal at véraison and Double Maturation Raisonnée (15.0 points) and control (16.0 points).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“The impact of canopy managements on grape and wine composition of cv. ‘Istrian Malvasia’ (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf removal at véraison improved wine phenolic composition.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
Leaf removal at véraisone0
Outcome
phenolic composition of winee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf removal at véraison and Double Maturation Raisonnée improved the phenolic composition of wine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–981 · show in text ↑
t0

“The impact of canopy managements on grape and wine composition of cv. ‘Istrian Malvasia’ (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double Maturation Raisonnée improved wine phenolic composition.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
Double Maturation Raisonnéee0
Outcome
phenolic composition of winee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf removal at véraison and Double Maturation Raisonnée improved the phenolic composition of wine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–981 · show in text ↑
t0

“The impact of canopy managements on grape and wine composition of cv. ‘Istrian Malvasia’ (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early leaf removal significantly increased yield.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
early leaf removale0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
augmentede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“early leaf removal significantly augmented the yield and titratable acidity, hydroxycinnamic acids and flavanols of wine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“The impact of canopy managements on grape and wine composition of cv. ‘Istrian Malvasia’ (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early leaf removal significantly increased wine titratable acidity, hydroxycinnamic acids and flavanols.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
early leaf removale0
Outcome
titratable acidity, hydroxycinnamic acids and flavanols of winee0
Direction
augmentede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“early leaf removal significantly augmented the yield and titratable acidity, hydroxycinnamic acids and flavanols of wine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“The impact of canopy managements on grape and wine composition of cv. ‘Istrian Malvasia’ (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑

pruning · molecular: metabolites · VitisResults differ

47 papers: 36 positive, 11 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

pruning · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults differ

61 papers: 41 positive, 20 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

stage · quality: phytochemicals · VitisPositive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

pruning · quality: phytochemicals · VitisPositive and negative results

38 papers: 30 positive, 8 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

pruning · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

107 papers: 71 positive, 36 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.