Paper · 2011 · Anhui nongye kexue

The Effect of Comprehensive Application Technology Drip Irrigation System on the Growth of Sugarcane

Xiulin Wang

10
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Objective] The aim was to increase the utilization of sugarcane drip irrigation system,improve the yield and sugarcane planted benefits.[Method] Compared with the traditional drip method of testing,the use effect of comprehensive application drip irrigation system was explored.[Results] The results showed that the application of drip irrigation systems comprehensive technology,irrigation + fertilizer + irrigation irrigation medicine treatment increased emergence rate,and promoted the growth of sugar cane all,there were more effective stems and heavy single stem weight,and promoted the maturity of sugarcane;promoted sugar cane ratoon sugarcane bud germination,increased the effective ratoon sugarcane stalk.Thus,the new plant would enable the output of sugarcane and sugar,35.9% and 0.32% higher than the control,respectively;the ratoon cane yield and sugar content 36.0% and 0.27% higher than the control,respectively.[Conclusion] The comprehensive application of technology drip irrigation system could significantly improve the yield of Sugarcane and sugar content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated drip treatment increased emergence rate.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
irrigation + fertilizer + irrigation irrigation medicine treatmente0
Outcome
emergence ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation + fertilizer + irrigation irrigation medicine treatment increased emergence rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–472 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated drip treatment promoted sugarcane growth.

Taxon
sugar canee0
Treatment
irrigation + fertilizer + irrigation irrigation medicine treatmente1
Outcome
growth of sugar canee0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“and promoted the growth of sugar cane all”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–514 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigation + fertilizer + irrigation irrigation medicine treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–447 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated drip treatment increased effective stems and single-stem weight.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
irrigation + fertilizer + irrigation irrigation medicine treatmente1
Outcome
effective stems and heavy single stem weighte0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“there were more effective stems and heavy single stem weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–575 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigation + fertilizer + irrigation irrigation medicine treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–447 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated drip treatment promoted sugarcane maturity.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
irrigation + fertilizer + irrigation irrigation medicine treatmente1
Outcome
maturity of sugarcanee0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“and promoted the maturity of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–614 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigation + fertilizer + irrigation irrigation medicine treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–447 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated drip treatment promoted ratoon bud germination.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
irrigation + fertilizer + irrigation irrigation medicine treatmente1
Outcome
ratoon sugarcane bud germinatione0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“promoted sugar cane ratoon sugarcane bud germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–667 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigation + fertilizer + irrigation irrigation medicine treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–447 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated drip treatment increased effective ratoon stalks.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
irrigation + fertilizer + irrigation irrigation medicine treatmente1
Outcome
effective ratoon sugarcane stalke0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increased the effective ratoon sugarcane stalk”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–714 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigation + fertilizer + irrigation irrigation medicine treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–447 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

New-plant sugarcane output was 35.9% higher than control.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
irrigation + fertilizer + irrigation irrigation medicine treatmente1
Outcome
output of sugarcanee0
Direction
highere0
Value
35.9%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“the output of sugarcane and sugar,35.9% and 0.32% higher than the control,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–833 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigation + fertilizer + irrigation irrigation medicine treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–447 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

New-plant sugar output was 0.32% higher than control.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
irrigation + fertilizer + irrigation irrigation medicine treatmente1
Outcome
sugare0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.32%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“the output of sugarcane and sugar,35.9% and 0.32% higher than the control,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–833 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigation + fertilizer + irrigation irrigation medicine treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–447 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ratoon cane yield was 36.0% higher than control.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
irrigation + fertilizer + irrigation irrigation medicine treatmente1
Outcome
ratoon cane yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
36.0%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“the ratoon cane yield and sugar content 36.0% and 0.27% higher than the control,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigation + fertilizer + irrigation irrigation medicine treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–447 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ratoon cane sugar content was 0.27% higher than control.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
irrigation + fertilizer + irrigation irrigation medicine treatmente1
Outcome
sugar contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.27%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“the ratoon cane yield and sugar content 36.0% and 0.27% higher than the control,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigation + fertilizer + irrigation irrigation medicine treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–447 · show in text ↑

drug · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

104 papers: 91 positive, 13 negative or no effect

90 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

fertilization · phenology · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 24 positive, 17 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

irrigation · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 47 positive, 7 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

irrigation · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

142 papers: 129 positive, 13 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

138 papers more in this group

See all 142 papers →

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

342 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.