Paper · 2009 · Xinjiang nongye kexue

Effect of Biogas Slurry Soaking Seed on Growth and Yield of Upland Cotton

Ming Chen

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The best way of seed soaking by biogas slurry was determined based on the testing upland cotton.This test uses a single-factor completely randomized block experiment design,the different biogas slurry soaking time for field trial was studied.The results show that the germination rate of all treatments by soaking with biogas slurry was higher than that of control,higher than average from 0.5% to 3.5%,the germination rate of soaking 8h was up to 85.5 percent.Biogas slurry soaking treatment,single boll weight,seed index were higher than those of the control,of which soaking 8h was the best,lint percentage increased by 1.1%,single-boll weight increased by 0.3 g,seed index increased by 0.11,compared with control.The number of single plant boll of all treatments increased by 0.1 to 0.5.Although the chlorophyll content and dry matter accumulation of the biogas slurry soaking treatment were higher,there was little difference of yield between all treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biogas slurry soaking increased germination rate by 0.5% to 3.5% over control.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Treatment
soaking with biogas slurrye0
Outcome
germination ratee0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.5% to 3.5%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“germination rate of all treatments by soaking with biogas slurry was higher than that of control,higher than average from 0.5% to 3.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–402 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight-hour soaking produced a germination rate of 85.5 percent.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Treatment
soaking 8he0
Outcome
germination ratee0
Direction
up toe0
Value
85.5 percente0

Verbatim

e0

“germination rate of soaking 8h was up to 85.5 percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–460 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight-hour soaking increased lint percentage by 1.1% versus control.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Treatment
soaking 8he0
Outcome
lint percentagee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.1%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“soaking 8h was the best,lint percentage increased by 1.1%,single-boll weight increased by 0.3 g,seed index increased by 0.11,compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight-hour soaking increased single-boll weight by 0.3 g versus control.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Treatment
soaking 8he0
Outcome
single-boll weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.3 ge0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“soaking 8h was the best,lint percentage increased by 1.1%,single-boll weight increased by 0.3 g,seed index increased by 0.11,compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight-hour soaking increased seed index by 0.11 versus control.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Treatment
soaking 8he0
Outcome
seed indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.11e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“soaking 8h was the best,lint percentage increased by 1.1%,single-boll weight increased by 0.3 g,seed index increased by 0.11,compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biogas slurry soaking increased bolls per plant by 0.1 to 0.5.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Treatment
Biogas Slurry Soaking Seedt1
Outcome
number of single plant bolle0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.1 to 0.5e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“number of single plant boll of all treatments increased by 0.1 to 0.5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–73 · show in text ↑
t1

“Biogas Slurry Soaking Seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biogas slurry soaking increased chlorophyll content and dry matter accumulation.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Treatment
biogas slurry soaking treatmente0
Outcome
chlorophyll content and dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyll content and dry matter accumulation of the biogas slurry soaking treatment were higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield differed little across biogas slurry soaking treatments.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
little differencee0

Verbatim

e0

“there was little difference of yield between all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–73 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 30 positive, 1 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

application · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 58 positive, 19 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

application · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

115 papers: 96 positive, 19 negative or no effect

95 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

111 papers more in this group

See all 115 papers →

fertilization · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 177 positive, 25 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 253 positive, 30 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

33 papers: 33 positive, 0 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.