Paper · 2001

Field Tests of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Applied as a Biological Fertilizer

Liu Runjin

16
claims
20
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field trials of arbuscular mycorrhizal(AM) fungi as a biological fertilizer applied on watermelon, cucumber, taro, bean, peanut, sweet potato, and corn were carried out. Results showed that the yields of tested crops colonized by AM fungi were increased by 0~66% compared to controls. The total efficiency rate of increasing yields and economic benefits were 95.5% and 68.2% respectively, for all tested crops, one hundred percentage for watermelon, cucumber, taro and bean. The input/output ratios for watermelon, cucumber, taro and bean were 1 ∶ 4.8~6.7, 1 ∶ 4.4, 1 ∶ 5~6.1 and 1 ∶ 2.8~3.4 respectively. The yield of mycorrhizal watermelon plants in replant plots after 3-year rotation was 2.7 times greater than that of control. Although yields of peanut and corn were increased by the biological fertilizer, their pure income were negative. GS preparation enhanced the yield of sweet potato, its input/output ratio was only 1∶2.3; while GV9 preparation did not. So the efficiency of AM fungal fertilizer was varied with crops. It was concluded that efficient AM fungi could increase economic benefits of horticultural crops and play a role in protecting ecological environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increased crop yields by 0~66% compared to controls.

Taxon
watermelon, cucumber, taro, bean, peanut, sweet potato, and corne0
Treatment
AM fungie1
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae1symbiont
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
0~66%e1
Comparator
controlse1

Verbatim

e0

“Field trials of arbuscular mycorrhizal(AM) fungi as a biological fertilizer applied on watermelon, cucumber, taro, bean, peanut, sweet potato, and corn were carried out”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–168 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that the yields of tested crops colonized by AM fungi were increased by 0~66% compared to controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–283 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total efficiency rate of increasing yields was 95.5% across all tested crops.

Taxon
watermelon, cucumber, taro, bean, peanut, sweet potato, and corne0
Outcome
total efficiency rate of increasing yieldse2
Value
95.5%e2

Verbatim

e0

“Field trials of arbuscular mycorrhizal(AM) fungi as a biological fertilizer applied on watermelon, cucumber, taro, bean, peanut, sweet potato, and corn were carried out”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–168 · show in text ↑
e2

“The total efficiency rate of increasing yields and economic benefits were 95.5% and 68.2% respectively, for all tested crops, one hundred percentage for watermelon, cucumber, taro and bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–473 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Economic benefit efficiency rate was 68.2% across all tested crops.

Taxon
watermelon, cucumber, taro, bean, peanut, sweet potato, and corne0
Outcome
economic benefitse2
Value
68.2%e2

Verbatim

e0

“Field trials of arbuscular mycorrhizal(AM) fungi as a biological fertilizer applied on watermelon, cucumber, taro, bean, peanut, sweet potato, and corn were carried out”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–168 · show in text ↑
e2

“The total efficiency rate of increasing yields and economic benefits were 95.5% and 68.2% respectively, for all tested crops, one hundred percentage for watermelon, cucumber, taro and bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–473 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total efficiency rate of increasing yields reached one hundred percent for watermelon, cucumber, taro and bean.

Taxon
watermelon, cucumber, taro and beane2
Outcome
total efficiency rate of increasing yieldse2
Value
one hundred percentagee2

Verbatim

e2

“The total efficiency rate of increasing yields and economic benefits were 95.5% and 68.2% respectively, for all tested crops, one hundred percentage for watermelon, cucumber, taro and bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–473 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Input/output ratio for watermelon was 1 ∶ 4.8~6.7.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse4
Outcome
input/output ratiose4
Value
1 ∶ 4.8~6.7e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The input/output ratios for watermelon, cucumber, taro and bean were 1 ∶ 4.8~6.7, 1 ∶ 4.4, 1 ∶ 5~6.1 and 1 ∶ 2.8~3.4 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–604 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Input/output ratio for cucumber was 1 ∶ 4.4.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse4
Outcome
input/output ratiose4
Value
1 ∶ 4.4e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The input/output ratios for watermelon, cucumber, taro and bean were 1 ∶ 4.8~6.7, 1 ∶ 4.4, 1 ∶ 5~6.1 and 1 ∶ 2.8~3.4 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–604 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Input/output ratio for taro was 1 ∶ 5~6.1.

Outcome
input/output ratiose4
Value
1 ∶ 5~6.1e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The input/output ratios for watermelon, cucumber, taro and bean were 1 ∶ 4.8~6.7, 1 ∶ 4.4, 1 ∶ 5~6.1 and 1 ∶ 2.8~3.4 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–604 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Input/output ratio for bean was 1 ∶ 2.8~3.4.

Taxon
beane4
Outcome
input/output ratiose4
Value
1 ∶ 2.8~3.4e4

Verbatim

e4

“The input/output ratios for watermelon, cucumber, taro and bean were 1 ∶ 4.8~6.7, 1 ∶ 4.4, 1 ∶ 5~6.1 and 1 ∶ 2.8~3.4 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–604 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield of mycorrhizal watermelon in replant plots after 3-year rotation was 2.7 times that of control.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse5
Treatment
mycorrhizale5
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
greatere5
Value
2.7 timese5
Comparator
controle5
Setting
replant plots after 3-year rotatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The yield of mycorrhizal watermelon plants in replant plots after 3-year rotation was 2.7 times greater than that of control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–730 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yields of peanut and corn increased with the biological fertilizer.

Treatment
biological fertilizere6
Outcome
yieldse6
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Although yields of peanut and corn were increased by the biological fertilizer, their pure income were negative”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pure income from peanut and corn was negative with the biological fertilizer.

Treatment
biological fertilizere6
Outcome
pure incomee6
Direction
negativee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Although yields of peanut and corn were increased by the biological fertilizer, their pure income were negative”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GS preparation enhanced sweet potato yield.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase7
Treatment
GS preparatione7
Outcome
yielde7
Direction
enhancede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“GS preparation enhanced the yield of sweet potato, its input/output ratio was only 1∶2.3; while GV9 preparation did not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GV9 preparation did not enhance sweet potato yield.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase7
Treatment
GV9 preparatione7
Outcome
yielde7
Direction
did note7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“GS preparation enhanced the yield of sweet potato, its input/output ratio was only 1∶2.3; while GV9 preparation did not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–964 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Input/output ratio for sweet potato was 1∶2.3.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase7
Outcome
input/output ratioe7
Value
1∶2.3e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“GS preparation enhanced the yield of sweet potato, its input/output ratio was only 1∶2.3; while GV9 preparation did not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–964 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Efficiency of AM fungal fertilizer varied among crops.

Taxon
watermelon, cucumber, taro, bean, peanut, sweet potato, and corne0
Treatment
AM fungal fertilizere1
Outcome
efficiency of AM fungal fertilizere1
Direction
variede1

Verbatim

e0

“Field trials of arbuscular mycorrhizal(AM) fungi as a biological fertilizer applied on watermelon, cucumber, taro, bean, peanut, sweet potato, and corn were carried out”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–168 · show in text ↑
e1

“So the efficiency of AM fungal fertilizer was varied with crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Efficient AM fungi could increase economic benefits of horticultural crops.

Taxon
horticultural cropse1
Treatment
efficient AM fungie1
Outcome
economic benefitse1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“It was concluded that efficient AM fungi could increase economic benefits of horticultural crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1127 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

683 papers: 635 positive, 48 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

679 papers more in this group

See all 683 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.