Paper · 2013 · Journal of Yangzhou University

Effects of site-specific nitrogen management on morphology and physiology of roots and yield of rice

Zhang Ha

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two rice cultivars of Shanyou 63(indica)and Lianjing 6(japonica)were grown in field experiments with two nitrogen(N)managements,site-specific N management(SSNM,N application according to soil fertility,leaf color and growth status,and cultivar types)and farmers' fertilizer practice(FFP).Present investigation was aimed to determine the effect of SSNM on roots growth and yield of rice.Results showed that the root dry weight in the FFP was higher as compared to that in the SSNM before heading,whereas it was lower at and after heading.During the whole growing season,SSNM significantly increased the root-shoot ratio.Compared with FFP,SSNM increased root oxidation activity(ROA)at and after panicle initiation,especially ROA per stem.SSNM also increased the photosynthetic rate of the flag leaves after heading.Compared with FFP,SSNM increased grain yield by 7.2%-9.4%,N partial-factor productivity(grain yield/amount of N applied)by 38%-46%,and N agronomic efficiency by 56%-77%.The enhancement of root growth at the latter growing stage would account for the increase in grain yield and N use efficiency under SSNM.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root dry weight under farmers fertilizer practice (FFP) was higher than under SSNM before heading.

Organ / stage
before headinge1
Treatment
FFPe1
Outcome
root dry weighte1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
SSNMe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“roots and yield of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that the root dry weight in the FFP was higher as compared to that in the SSNM before heading, whereas it was lower at and after heading”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 386–536 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root dry weight under FFP was lower than under SSNM at and after heading.

Organ / stage
at and after headinge1
Treatment
FFPe1
Outcome
root dry weighte1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
SSNMe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“roots and yield of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that the root dry weight in the FFP was higher as compared to that in the SSNM before heading, whereas it was lower at and after heading”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 386–536 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SSNM significantly increased the root-shoot ratio during the whole growing season.

Treatment
SSNMe2
Outcome
root-shoot ratioe2
Direction
increasede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“roots and yield of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–100 · show in text ↑
e2

“During the whole growing season, SSNM significantly increased the root-shoot ratio”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 537–618 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSNM increased root oxidation activity at and after panicle initiation compared with FFP.

Organ / stage
at and after panicle initiatione3
Treatment
SSNMe3
Outcome
root oxidation activity(ROA)e3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
FFPe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“roots and yield of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–100 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compared with FFP,SSNM increased root oxidation activity(ROA)at and after panicle initiation,especially ROA per stem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–735 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSNM increased the photosynthetic rate of flag leaves after heading.

Organ / stage
flag leavese4
Treatment
SSNMe4
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee4
Direction
increasede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“roots and yield of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–100 · show in text ↑
e4

“SSNM also increased the photosynthetic rate of the flag leaves after heading”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–812 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSNM increased rice grain yield by 7.2%-9.4% compared with FFP.

Treatment
SSNMe5
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
increasede5
Value
7.2%-9.4%e5
Comparator
FFPe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“roots and yield of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–100 · show in text ↑
e5

“Compared with FFP,SSNM increased grain yield by 7.2%-9.4%,N partial-factor productivity(grain yield/amount of N applied)by 38%-46%,and N agronomic efficiency by 56%-77%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSNM increased N partial-factor productivity by 38%-46% compared with FFP.

Treatment
SSNMe5
Outcome
N partial-factor productivitye5
Direction
increasede5
Value
38%-46%e5
Comparator
FFPe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“roots and yield of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–100 · show in text ↑
e5

“Compared with FFP,SSNM increased grain yield by 7.2%-9.4%,N partial-factor productivity(grain yield/amount of N applied)by 38%-46%,and N agronomic efficiency by 56%-77%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSNM increased N agronomic efficiency by 56%-77% compared with FFP.

Treatment
SSNMe5
Outcome
N agronomic efficiencye5
Direction
increasede5
Value
56%-77%e5
Comparator
FFPe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“roots and yield of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–100 · show in text ↑
e5

“Compared with FFP,SSNM increased grain yield by 7.2%-9.4%,N partial-factor productivity(grain yield/amount of N applied)by 38%-46%,and N agronomic efficiency by 56%-77%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–981 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced root growth at the latter growing stage would account for higher grain yield and N use efficiency under SSNM.

Treatment
SSNMe6
Outcome
increase in grain yield and N use efficiencye6
Qualifier
enhancement of root growth at the latter growing stagee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“roots and yield of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–100 · show in text ↑
e6

“The enhancement of root growth at the latter growing stage would account for the increase in grain yield and N use efficiency under SSNM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1118 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

216 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.