Abstract
The effect of basal application of slow-release urea combined with P and K fertilizers but without top-dressing on rice growth was conducted in Panshang County, Liaoning Province of China, with plot and demonstration trials. The results showed that there was no significant different between slow-release urea treatment and conventional fertilization treatment. However, basal application of slow-release urea without top-dressing could supply enough N during the rice growing stages, guarantee rice yield and save labor force. It is suggested that the slow-release urea could be popularized in rice production in the study region.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Basal slow-release urea without top-dressing did not differ significantly from conventional fertilization for rice growth in plot and demonstration trials in Panshang County, Liaoning.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- slow-release urea treatmente0
- Outcome
- rice growtht0
- Direction
- no significant differente0
- Comparator
- conventional fertilization treatmente0
- Setting
- Panshang County, Liaoning Province of Chinae1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rice growth”
e0“there was no significant different between slow-release urea treatment and conventional fertilization treatment”
e1“Panshang County, Liaoning Province of China”
Claim · model-written summary
Basal slow-release urea without top-dressing could supply enough N during rice growing stages.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- basal application of slow-release urea without top-dressinge0
- Outcome
- supply enough Ne0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“basal application of slow-release urea without top-dressing could supply enough N during the rice growing stages, guarantee rice yield and save labor force”
Claim · model-written summary
Basal slow-release urea without top-dressing could guarantee rice yield.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- basal application of slow-release urea without top-dressinge0
- Outcome
- guarantee rice yielde0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“basal application of slow-release urea without top-dressing could supply enough N during the rice growing stages, guarantee rice yield and save labor force”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest slow-release urea could be popularized in rice production in the study region.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Outcome
- popularized in rice production in the study regione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the slow-release urea could be popularized in rice production in the study region”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
108 papers in the same direction as this paper · 402 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
507 papers more in this group
See all 511 papers →nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
2,041 papers more in this group
See all 2,045 papers →fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
3,451 papers more in this group
See all 3,455 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.