Paper · 2005 · Xi'nan Nongye Daxue xuebao

EFFECTS OF SALICYLIC ACID ON POSTHARVEST SENESCENCE AND MEMBRANE LIPID PEROX IDATION OF PEAR FRUIT (PYRUS PYRIFOLIAVAR. HUANGHUA)

Ng D

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Harvested fru it of pear(Pyrus pyrifoliavar.Huanghua)was imm ersed in 0.1 g /L and 0.3 g /L salicylic ac id(SA) solutions for 20 m inutes prior to storage at 25±1℃.As compared w ith the control(imm ersion in water),0.1 g /L SA treatm ent inh ib ited the de-c line in SOD,CAT and POD activities of the stored fru it and decreased the its relative conductivity and MDA accumu lation,thus delaying the postharvest ripen ing and senescence.App lied at 0.3 g /L,SA had no sign ificant influence on the senescence and m embrane lip id per-oxidation of the fru it.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

0.1 g /L SA inhibited decline in SOD, CAT and POD activities versus water control.

Treatment
0.1 g /L SA treatm ente0
Outcome
SOD,CAT and POD activitiese0
Direction
inh ib ited the de-c linee0
Comparator
the control(imm ersion in water)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PEAR FRUIT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“As compared w ith the control(imm ersion in water),0.1 g /L SA treatm ent inh ib ited the de-c line in SOD,CAT and POD activities of the stored fru it”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–314 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

0.1 g /L SA decreased fruit relative conductivity and MDA accumulation.

Treatment
0.1 g /L SA treatm ente0
Outcome
relative conductivity and MDA accumu latione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PEAR FRUIT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“0.1 g /L SA treatm ent inh ib ited the de-c line in SOD,CAT and POD activities of the stored fru it and decreased the its relative conductivity and MDA accumu lation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

0.1 g /L SA delayed postharvest ripening and senescence.

Treatment
0.1 g /L SA treatm ente1
Outcome
postharvest ripen ing and senescencee0
Direction
delayinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PEAR FRUIT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“thus delaying the postharvest ripen ing and senescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–435 · show in text ↑
e1

“0.1 g /L SA treatm ent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–237 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

0.3 g /L SA had no significant influence on fruit senescence and membrane lipid peroxidation.

Treatment
0.3 g /Le0
Outcome
senescence and m embrane lip id per-oxidatione0
Direction
no sign ificant influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PEAR FRUIT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“App lied at 0.3 g /L,SA had no sign ificant influence on the senescence and m embrane lip id per-oxidation of the fru it”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–556 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · physiology: oxidative · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

salicylic acid · quality: postharvest · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.