Abstract
This experiment was conducted with fruits of ‘Brazil’banana,‘consort red’mango and ‘Sunrise’ papaya.The effects of 1-MCP on the storage quality of banana,mango and papaya fruits stored at 15 ℃ were investigated and compared.The results showed that 1-MCP treatment not only significantly inhibited the occurrence of fruit diseases and the increase in cell membrane permeability,but also obviously retarded the reduction of fruit firmness and peel colour change.Meanwhile,the changes in content of TSS,Vc and TA were also effectively slowed down by 1-MCP treatment.It suggested that 1-MCP treatment could improve fruit storage quality,and delay fruit ripening and softening process,which prolonged the storage life of banana,mango and papaya fruits.In a word,responses of banana,papaya and mango fruits to 1-MCP were different,the fresh-keeping effect of 1-MCP on papaya fruit was the best,mango fruit was the worst.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
1-MCP inhibited fruit diseases in banana.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“banana”
e0“1-MCP treatment not only significantly inhibited the occurrence of fruit diseases and the increase in cell membrane permeability,but also obviously retarded the reduction of fruit firmness and peel colour change”
Claim · model-written summary
1-MCP inhibited fruit diseases in mango.
- Taxon
- mango
_from_India.jpg?width=60)
Mangifera indicat0 - Treatment
- 1-MCP treatmente0
- Outcome
- occurrence of fruit diseasese0
- Direction
- inhibitede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“mango”
e0“1-MCP treatment not only significantly inhibited the occurrence of fruit diseases and the increase in cell membrane permeability,but also obviously retarded the reduction of fruit firmness and peel colour change”
Claim · model-written summary
1-MCP inhibited fruit diseases in papaya.
- Taxon
- papaya
_-_DPLA_-_55200ec009622d7d42349f3583df310e.jpg?width=60)
Carica papayat0 - Treatment
- 1-MCP treatmente0
- Outcome
- occurrence of fruit diseasese0
- Direction
- inhibitede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_-_DPLA_-_55200ec009622d7d42349f3583df310e.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“papaya”
e0“1-MCP treatment not only significantly inhibited the occurrence of fruit diseases and the increase in cell membrane permeability,but also obviously retarded the reduction of fruit firmness and peel colour change”
Claim · model-written summary
1-MCP inhibited increased membrane permeability in banana.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“banana”
e0“1-MCP treatment not only significantly inhibited the occurrence of fruit diseases and the increase in cell membrane permeability,but also obviously retarded the reduction of fruit firmness and peel colour change”
Claim · model-written summary
1-MCP inhibited increased membrane permeability in mango.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- 1-MCP treatmente0
- Outcome
- cell membrane permeabilitye0
- Direction
- inhibitede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“mango”
e0“1-MCP treatment not only significantly inhibited the occurrence of fruit diseases and the increase in cell membrane permeability,but also obviously retarded the reduction of fruit firmness and peel colour change”
Claim · model-written summary
1-MCP inhibited increased membrane permeability in papaya.
- Taxon
- papayaCarica papayat0
- Treatment
- 1-MCP treatmente0
- Outcome
- cell membrane permeabilitye0
- Direction
- inhibitede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“papaya”
e0“1-MCP treatment not only significantly inhibited the occurrence of fruit diseases and the increase in cell membrane permeability,but also obviously retarded the reduction of fruit firmness and peel colour change”
Claim · model-written summary
1-MCP retarded firmness loss and peel colour change in banana.
- Taxon
- bananat0
- Treatment
- 1-MCP treatmente0
- Outcome
- reduction of fruit firmness and peel colour changee0
- Direction
- retardede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“banana”
e0“1-MCP treatment not only significantly inhibited the occurrence of fruit diseases and the increase in cell membrane permeability,but also obviously retarded the reduction of fruit firmness and peel colour change”
Claim · model-written summary
1-MCP retarded firmness loss and peel colour change in mango.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- 1-MCP treatmente0
- Outcome
- reduction of fruit firmness and peel colour changee0
- Direction
- retardede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“mango”
e0“1-MCP treatment not only significantly inhibited the occurrence of fruit diseases and the increase in cell membrane permeability,but also obviously retarded the reduction of fruit firmness and peel colour change”
Claim · model-written summary
1-MCP retarded firmness loss and peel colour change in papaya.
- Taxon
- papayaCarica papayat0
- Treatment
- 1-MCP treatmente0
- Outcome
- reduction of fruit firmness and peel colour changee0
- Direction
- retardede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“papaya”
e0“1-MCP treatment not only significantly inhibited the occurrence of fruit diseases and the increase in cell membrane permeability,but also obviously retarded the reduction of fruit firmness and peel colour change”
Claim · model-written summary
1-MCP slowed changes in TSS, Vc and TA in banana.
- Taxon
- bananat0
- Treatment
- 1-MCP treatmente0
- Outcome
- changes in content of TSS,Vc and TAe0
- Direction
- slowed downe0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“banana”
e0“the changes in content of TSS,Vc and TA were also effectively slowed down by 1-MCP treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
1-MCP slowed changes in TSS, Vc and TA in mango.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- 1-MCP treatmente0
- Outcome
- changes in content of TSS,Vc and TAe0
- Direction
- slowed downe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“mango”
e0“the changes in content of TSS,Vc and TA were also effectively slowed down by 1-MCP treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
1-MCP slowed changes in TSS, Vc and TA in papaya.
- Taxon
- papayaCarica papayat0
- Treatment
- 1-MCP treatmente0
- Outcome
- changes in content of TSS,Vc and TAe0
- Direction
- slowed downe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“papaya”
e0“the changes in content of TSS,Vc and TA were also effectively slowed down by 1-MCP treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
The fresh-keeping effect of 1-MCP was best in papaya.
- Taxon
- papayaCarica papayae0
- Treatment
- 1-MCPe0
- Outcome
- fresh-keeping effecte0
- Direction
- beste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the fresh-keeping effect of 1-MCP on papaya fruit was the best,mango fruit was the worst”
Claim · model-written summary
The fresh-keeping effect of 1-MCP was worst in mango.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- 1-MCPe0
- Outcome
- fresh-keeping effecte0
- Direction
- worste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the fresh-keeping effect of 1-MCP on papaya fruit was the best,mango fruit was the worst”
The same questions in other papers
1-methylcyclopropene · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →1-methylcyclopropene · quality: postharvest · Carica papaya (papaya)Results differ
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →1-methylcyclopropene · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ
34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →1-methylcyclopropene · quality: postharvest · MusaResults differ
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →1-methylcyclopropene · quality: sugar starch · Carica papaya (papaya)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →1-methylcyclopropene · quality: sugar starch · MusaPositive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: oxidative · MusaResults agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: oxidative · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.