Paper · 1992 · 土壤圈(英文版)

Study on "Blind-Ear"——Copper Deficiency Symptom in Wheat on Subtropic Hill Soils

Qin S

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The blind-ear as a Cu deficiency symptom in wheat on upland soils in the hilly area of Zhejiang Province was discussed in this paper. Through 3 years of field experiments, it was elucidated that blind-ear in wheat plant appeared due to the low level of available Cu in the soils, and the critical value 3 mg / kg for total Cu in the plant at grain filling stage and 1 mg/ kg for available Cu (0.1 M HCl) in the soils. A basal dressing of 30 kg / ha of Cu sulfate to the soils could completely eliminate Cu deficiency symptoms, obtain normal grain yield and have residual effect for at least 3 years.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Mechanismobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blind-ear in wheat arose from low soil available copper.

Compound
Cue0
Outcome
blind-eare0
Qualifier
low level of available Cu in the soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“blind-ear in wheat plant appeared due to the low level of available Cu in the soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–278 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The critical total plant Cu value was 3 mg / kg at grain filling.

Organ / stage
grain filling stagee0
Outcome
total Cu in the plante0
Value
3 mg / kge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the critical value 3 mg / kg for total Cu in the plant at grain filling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–361 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The critical available soil Cu value was 1 mg/ kg.

Outcome
available Cu (0.1 M HCl) in the soilse0
Value
1 mg/ kge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1 mg/ kg for available Cu (0.1 M HCl) in the soils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–417 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal 30 kg / ha Cu sulfate eliminated Cu deficiency symptoms.

Treatment
30 kg / ha of Cu sulfatee0
Outcome
Cu deficiency symptomse0
Direction
eliminatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A basal dressing of 30 kg / ha of Cu sulfate to the soils could completely eliminate Cu deficiency symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–525 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal copper sulfate gave normal grain yield.

Treatment
30 kg / ha of Cu sulfatee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
normale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A basal dressing of 30 kg / ha of Cu sulfate to the soils could completely eliminate Cu deficiency symptoms, obtain normal grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–552 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The copper sulfate treatment had residual effect for at least three years.

Outcome
residual effecte0
Value
3 yearse0
Qualifier
at least 3 yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“have residual effect for at least 3 years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–599 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑

copper atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 63 positive, 12 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

sulfate · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

copper atom · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 11 positive, 5 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.