Paper · 2013 · Nanfang nongye xuebao

Effects of different fertilization treatments on the yield and quality of peanut

Su Tian

11
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Objective]The current experiment was carried out in order to explore the suitable fertilization mode for peanut production in tropical and subtropical regions from Guangxi. [Method]Five treatments, including non-fertilizer treatment, chemical fertilizer, chemical fertilizer + chicken manure, chemical fertilizer + pig manure, and chemical fertilizer + cattle manure, were arranged to research the effect of basal and topdressing fertilization modes on peanut (Guihua 771 and Guihua 30) growth, nutrients uptake, yield, and quality. [Result]The results showed that dung fertilizer application promoted the P, K transformation to pod, and topdressing of inorganic fertilizers led to excessive growth of peanut, which caused the peanut yield to either increase slightly or decrease. Under the condition of basal fertilization and top dressing with inorganic fertilizer, inorganic fertilizers +chicken manure could promote the early peanut growth and significantly improve the peanut bio-fresh weight. As a result, the inorganic fertilizers+cattle manure was the treatment that produced optimal performance for overall yield and quality improvement. In this study, the dry peanut pods and kernel production of Guihua 771 were slightly lower than those of Guihua 30, but the shelling percentage and fat content Guihua 771 were higher than that of Guihua 30; the theoretical oil productions of the two varieties were equal. [Conclusion]Thus basal fertilizer was the best fertilization treatment for peanuts production in Guangxi.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dung fertilizer promoted P and K movement to pods.

Treatment
dung fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
P, K transformation to pode0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dung fertilizer application promoted the P, K transformation to pod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–633 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effects of different fertilization treatments on the yield and quality of peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic topdressing caused excessive peanut growth.

Treatment
topdressing of inorganic fertilizerse0
Outcome
growth of peanute0
Direction
excessivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“topdressing of inorganic fertilizers led to excessive growth of peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–709 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic topdressing caused peanut yield to rise slightly or fall.

Treatment
topdressing of inorganic fertilizerse0
Outcome
peanut yielde0
Direction
increase slightly or decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“topdressing of inorganic fertilizers led to excessive growth of peanut, which caused the peanut yield to either increase slightly or decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic fertilizers with chicken manure promoted early peanut growth.

Treatment
inorganic fertilizers +chicken manuree0
Outcome
early peanut growthe0
Direction
promotee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inorganic fertilizers +chicken manure could promote the early peanut growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–944 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic fertilizers with chicken manure significantly improved peanut fresh biomass.

Treatment
inorganic fertilizers +chicken manuree0
Outcome
peanut bio-fresh weighte0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inorganic fertilizers +chicken manure could promote the early peanut growth and significantly improve the peanut bio-fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–998 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic fertilizers with cattle manure gave the best overall yield and quality.

Treatment
inorganic fertilizers+cattle manuree0
Outcome
overall yield and quality improvemente0
Direction
optimale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inorganic fertilizers+cattle manure was the treatment that produced optimal performance for overall yield and quality improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1146 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Guihua 771 had slightly lower dry pod production than Guihua 30.

Material
Guihua 771e0
Outcome
dry peanut podse0
Direction
slightly lowere0
Comparator
Guihua 30e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the dry peanut pods and kernel production of Guihua 771 were slightly lower than those of Guihua 30”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1262 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Guihua 771 had slightly lower kernel production than Guihua 30.

Material
Guihua 771e0
Outcome
kernel productione0
Direction
slightly lowere0
Comparator
Guihua 30e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the dry peanut pods and kernel production of Guihua 771 were slightly lower than those of Guihua 30”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1262 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Guihua 771 had higher shelling percentage and fat content than Guihua 30.

Material
Guihua 771e0
Outcome
shelling percentage and fat contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Guihua 30e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the shelling percentage and fat content Guihua 771 were higher than that of Guihua 30”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1353 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two peanut varieties had equal theoretical oil production.

Outcome
theoretical oil productionse0
Direction
equale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the theoretical oil productions of the two varieties were equal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1418 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend basal fertilizer for peanut production in Guangxi.

Taxon
peanutsArachis hypogaeae0
Outcome
basal fertilizere0
Setting
Guangxie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“basal fertilizer was the best fertilization treatment for peanuts production in Guangxi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1524 · show in text ↑

fertilization · organism · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 26 positive, 5 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

fertilization · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

204 papers: 182 positive, 22 negative or no effect

181 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

200 papers more in this group

See all 204 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.